State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    1 268
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
They sounded in argument like they just did not want to hand it over to 'strangers' and were less focused on thr actual procedural issue.
Well, "strangers", automatically includes the public.
I really do not see how the reasoning could hold up under scrutiny, this is a common right violation if I have ever seen one.

The document/data requested was made public through the court system, it was viewed at the courthouse because it was public record, yet they then conspire to hide it again and block public access.

I wonder if they would have made the same decision if this had been a news organization asking, and not some citizen.
 
The stubborn wishful or even conspiratorial thinking itt is crazy. The whole thing about MNDES/ evidence was clear from the start. I spelled it out a million times, about exactly as paragraph 13 in the appellate opinion. It's not that complicated; it was never that complicated. This effort by Hardin was valiant and inventive, but it was an extreme uphill battle bc flat-out, that footage was never made evidence.
 
The stubborn wishful or even conspiratorial thinking itt is crazy. The whole thing about MNDES/ evidence was clear from the start. I spelled it out a million times, about exactly as paragraph 13 in the appellate opinion. It's not that complicated; it was never that complicated. This effort by Hardin was valiant and inventive, but it was an extreme uphill battle bc flat-out, that footage was never made evidence.
And I told you that I disagree with your interpretation of the rules.
Its uploaded, it was discussed in a hearing, the state did not concede the point.

The public has a right to see footage that was discussed as relevant to the case, because the defense was trying to have it disqualified.

The case is over, no investigation is taking place, the public has a right to see what was in that video the defense was trying to block the state from using.

I would follow the argument if they had said "only relevant portions should be made available", but in that case the defense should not have uploaded the entire video, or at least marked the timestamps for the relevant content.

The footage was public, and was accessed.
If their digital system is retarded and not fit for the purpose, thats a different issue.
But it was uploaded and submitted as evidence. Retroactively changing that months after the relevant hearing stinks.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
So is Nick actually implying that he's going to sue Null for defamation?
The man who started his career covering the Russell Greer suit becoming the next Russell Greer would be fitting.

1769697041033.jpeg 1769697072183.jpeg
 
Some how, Nick will get NULLS nudes for 50 bucks and somehow get Hardin to pay for them.
Gonna need a wide angle lens for dat shiz...
Once he gets with Scarlett it's only a matter of time before the police are back and we get body cam 2 electric boogaloo.
The only way to get body cam footage in Minnesota is if someone gets shot. So... possible.

I know, there's a lot of procedural stuff and reasons why people think the old bodycam should (continue to) come out. It's not happening, unless an involved party consents to it.

The reality is, Minnesota is as crooked as a duck's dick, and some of that is even set up in their legal code. The law that protects the footage is antithetical to an open and free society, one that watches the watchmen. We would have thousands of Minnesota Men, if MN had the same sort of sunshine laws that Florida has. Rekieta spouts "muh open courts" but it's for thee, not he. The county isn't going against its own, and the appeals courts will defer to the county ones. This isn't a "judge Persip got in touch with judge Godwinson" type scenario, it's how the weird ass Scandinavian-descended prudes prefer to do business.

At least until the Caliphate of Minnesota is complete, and Sharia becomes law.
 
how much money and favors did the corrupt Rekieta crime family call in for this?
i fucking hate Minnesota so much it's unreal.
An intermediate appeals court is not going to overrule a rule promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. None of this wasn't entirely predictable, moreover it was predicted. Wentzell is a dirty rotten cheat and a liar, but so long as the appeals court accepts his version of facts, which they're usually obligated to do, it comes to the conclusion it did.

No vast conspiracy here, just a couple ass-covering local judges. Note things aren't going very well for Nick one county over in Stearns. In fact, they're completely jerking him around in that HRO case.
 
An intermediate appeals court is not going to overrule a rule promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. None of this wasn't entirely predictable, moreover it was predicted. Wentzell is a dirty rotten cheat and a liar, but so long as the appeals court accepts his version of facts, which they're usually obligated to do, it comes to the conclusion it did.

No vast conspiracy here, just a couple ass-covering local judges. Note things aren't going very well for Nick one county over in Stearns. In fact, they're completely jerking him around in that HRO case.
Is there a separate thread for that, or at least a general time frame to start looking at posts? I stopped following the main Rekieta thread at some point because it moved too fast to even highlight skim (and a lot of his stream content honestly made me MATI), but seeing him actually get felted in court does sound like a good time.
 
The county isn't going against its own, and the appeals courts will defer to the county ones.
The expectation was set all along due to the MN Supreme Court making an incredibly stupid ruling that drastically limits the chances for the public to get access to court documents of any kind if they are sealed or "supposedly filed on error".

It opens the gate for courts to retroactively change things, and always be covered by appeals courts.
I understand that this was the expectation all along, I simply disagree with how the MN Supreme Court interpreted the law and what this means for the public's common law right to a transparent judicial process and access to it's records.
 
It opens the gate for courts to retroactively change things, and always be covered by appeals courts.
I understand that this was the expectation all along, I simply disagree with how the MN Supreme Court interpreted the law and what this means for the public's common law right to a transparent judicial process and access to it's records.
I agree, but I also posit that the decisions are 100% inline with how things run in Minnesota.
 
I'm going to be honest with you. Getting the body cam would be funny on multiple levels, but there won't be anything in it more humiliating than what Nick has done to himself in the meanwhile. Real galaxy (gas) brained move on Nick's part to take the sting out of the body cam by so thoroughly beclowning himself and Our Wife.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole