- Dołączono
- 21 Sie 2018
Some how, Nick will get NULLS nudes for 50 bucks and somehow get Hardin to pay for them.At this rate, Nick's gonna actually file for damages against null and win
Bros i need a hit of copeium bad.
TBV
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
Some how, Nick will get NULLS nudes for 50 bucks and somehow get Hardin to pay for them.At this rate, Nick's gonna actually file for damages against null and win
Wasn't Hardin the person who sued Rekieta?At this rate, Nick's gonna actually file for damages against null and win
Minnesota just decided that you have no recourse when you are being illegally denied access to court records.
What a joke of a state.
Rekieta himself was not sued. The sheriff who didn't hand over the data was.Wasn't Hardin the person who sued Rekieta?
Well, "strangers", automatically includes the public.They sounded in argument like they just did not want to hand it over to 'strangers' and were less focused on thr actual procedural issue.
And I told you that I disagree with your interpretation of the rules.The stubborn wishful or even conspiratorial thinking itt is crazy. The whole thing about MNDES/ evidence was clear from the start. I spelled it out a million times, about exactly as paragraph 13 in the appellate opinion. It's not that complicated; it was never that complicated. This effort by Hardin was valiant and inventive, but it was an extreme uphill battle bc flat-out, that footage was never made evidence.
Gonna need a wide angle lens for dat shiz...Some how, Nick will get NULLS nudes for 50 bucks and somehow get Hardin to pay for them.
The only way to get body cam footage in Minnesota is if someone gets shot. So... possible.Once he gets with Scarlett it's only a matter of time before the police are back and we get body cam 2 electric boogaloo.
If he sues Null for defamation, can the bodycam tapes become evidence?So is Nick actually implying that he's going to sue Null for defamation?
The man who started his career covering the Russell Greer suit becoming the next Russell Greer would be fitting.
Wyświetl załącznik 8490403Wyświetl załącznik 8490407
An intermediate appeals court is not going to overrule a rule promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. None of this wasn't entirely predictable, moreover it was predicted. Wentzell is a dirty rotten cheat and a liar, but so long as the appeals court accepts his version of facts, which they're usually obligated to do, it comes to the conclusion it did.how much money and favors did the corrupt Rekieta crime family call in for this?
i fucking hate Minnesota so much it's unreal.
This is Ty Beard's redemption run!So is Nick actually implying that he's going to sue Null for defamation?
Is there a separate thread for that, or at least a general time frame to start looking at posts? I stopped following the main Rekieta thread at some point because it moved too fast to even highlight skim (and a lot of his stream content honestly made me MATI), but seeing him actually get felted in court does sound like a good time.An intermediate appeals court is not going to overrule a rule promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. None of this wasn't entirely predictable, moreover it was predicted. Wentzell is a dirty rotten cheat and a liar, but so long as the appeals court accepts his version of facts, which they're usually obligated to do, it comes to the conclusion it did.
No vast conspiracy here, just a couple ass-covering local judges. Note things aren't going very well for Nick one county over in Stearns. In fact, they're completely jerking him around in that HRO case.
The image on the right should be of Nick wearing the oversized lips he put on when talking about Russel's condition, tbh.So is Nick actually implying that he's going to sue Null for defamation?
The man who started his career covering the Russell Greer suit becoming the next Russell Greer would be fitting.
Wyświetl załącznik 8490403Wyświetl załącznik 8490407
The expectation was set all along due to the MN Supreme Court making an incredibly stupid ruling that drastically limits the chances for the public to get access to court documents of any kind if they are sealed or "supposedly filed on error".The county isn't going against its own, and the appeals courts will defer to the county ones.
I agree, but I also posit that the decisions are 100% inline with how things run in Minnesota.It opens the gate for courts to retroactively change things, and always be covered by appeals courts.
I understand that this was the expectation all along, I simply disagree with how the MN Supreme Court interpreted the law and what this means for the public's common law right to a transparent judicial process and access to it's records.