Sexual Marxism

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Lithuophile

kiwifarms.net
Dołączono
5 Lip 2022
I can't help but think of how Marxist and class-combatist the current sexual discourse is.

On one hand you have chuds who complain about women all day and fantasize about having a big tiddy tradwife who will "fix" them.

On the other hand, you have retards who infantilize women and want men to become turbo-lumberjack millionaires in hopes that women will magically change their behavior because, to them, women are will-less automatons who merely react to external stimuli.

Both positions place the responsibility of action on a single gender and ignore that Mankind was created complementary but equal. They construct a whimsical fantasy of gender conflict while gender relations continue to deteriorate due to this pedantic battle of wills.
 
Porn Category: Interfinancial, Interracial, Intergenerational

Busty grandma Marie Antoi-wet seduces her son’s teen Section-8 best friend Li’l RiDickulous

The Spectre is looming, and the gooners are cooming
 
That's why you just shouldn't talk to people about anything of consequence.

The only acceptable topics of discussion are things like animals, like you sit next to a girl and say "Hey girl what's up, what animals you like?". There are a lot of acceptable answers, obv if she says she's into penguins though then you know she's a keeper.

But for real, that's mostly just because the internet encourages everyone to have extreme opinions and lean into collectivism/identity politics. That's the internet being gay as usual, that brand of thinking about topics as stupidly broad as gender was surely a lot more fringe previously.
 
On one hand you have chuds who complain about women all day and fantasize about having a big tiddy tradwife who will "fix" them.

On the other hand, you have retards who infantilize women and want men to become turbo-lumberjack millionaires in hopes that women will magically change their behavior because, to them, women are will-less automatons who merely react to external stimuli.
So basically one group worships the ideal of a perfect woman and the other treats them like a slab of meat entirely? Seems like more extreme versions of the old ideas of chivalry and women only being attracted to a man due to his wealth.
 
That's why you just shouldn't talk to people about anything of consequence.
That's not good though. Sure, initially you should talk to people (specifically women in this case, but just in general) about superficial things. But if you always talk to people about superficial things, all your relationships will be superficial. This is why people are so atomized and isolated from one another: they base all their relationships on things that don't matter rather than things like religion, personal philosophies and worldviews that complement each other.

I don't know about you, but being with a woman you just fuck and have nothing in common with sounds infinitely more hellish than being with a woman who not only complements you, but makes you a better man. Same goes for women in their choice of man. I think the a large part of the sexual dysfunction in society is just due to the focus on pure hedonism versus balancing short term pleasure with the consideration of long term gains (in the form of children,emotional/spiritual security etc). It's basically pitting our natural need for companionship with people of the opposite sex with our natural urge to create and mantain great things and the former almost always wins out in most people's minds.
 
I can't help but think of how Marxist and class-combatist the current sexual discourse is.

On one hand you have chuds who complain about women all day and fantasize about having a big tiddy tradwife who will "fix" them.

On the other hand, you have retards who infantilize women and want men to become turbo-lumberjack millionaires in hopes that women will magically change their behavior because, to them, women are will-less automatons who merely react to external stimuli.

Both positions place the responsibility of action on a single gender and ignore that Mankind was created complementary but equal. They construct a whimsical fantasy of gender conflict while gender relations continue to deteriorate due to this pedantic battle of wills.
This is entirely internet shit and only true for a minority of loser men and women.
 
I might do a deep thought thread about this but men and women weren't created equal. Men were created in the image of God. Women created in the image of man. As a help meet or helper.

I'm curious if that explains the shitty behavioral tendencies and the reason it's mens fault and responsibility, and burden to "be the bigger man" and fix the ills going on.
 
@Lithuophile

Things will only ever improve if women admit they fucked up with sexual revolution and gender equality.

It's why things won't improve. They'll continue coping their ways into being concubines and then say that it's just because those nasty lazy average men don't try hard enough.
 
Instagram, tiktok and the university system only affect a narrow slice of the female demographic, but it’s what’s easy to see because people constantly point it out to you and it’s plastered all over social media.

It’s not really like that the majority of the time when you get down to brass tacks, and childbirth will wipe your wife/girlfriends’ mind anyways and replace it with instinctual baby priorities. Afterwards, politics are nostalgia bait unless you go out of your way to remain current with your ethnocuckoldry postgraduate cohort
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole