Porn Addicts / Gooners / Coomers / /trash/ / 2chen / Sturdychan - Porn addicts that are proud of their degeneracy and want to spread it around the people. This is not a porn debate thread!

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

https://disqus.com/by/dylanogg/comments/ (archive)

Spoiler

https://disqus.com/by/dylanogg/about/ (archive)

 

[NoCockatrice]

On my front fucking page


But remember, it's only bad when men do it, when women do it it's quirky and wholesome

I fucking hate it when they draw men like that and then also dare to say something about body positivity

 

[Kari Kamiya]

I fucking hate it when they draw men like that and then also dare to say something about body positivity

I see nothing wrong with that character, though? If you're pointing out the hypocrisy of fat women screeching about how fat characters need to stay fat but then draw their OCs as hunks, then yeah, that's very well-documented.

 

[Brown People are Gross]

I see nothing wrong with that character, though? If you're pointing out the hypocrisy of fat women screeching about how fat characters need to stay fat but then draw their OCs as hunks, then yeah, that's very well-documented.

@NoCockatrice is a pooner, she's not happy with male standards because she'll never look male.

 

[The man The only man]

I see nothing wrong with that character, though? If you're pointing out the hypocrisy of fat women screeching about how fat characters need to stay fat but then draw their OCs as hunks, then yeah, that's very well-documented.

It's softcore porn of a dude and it shouldn't be on the front page. Its comparable to those animators who draw porn but skew the drawings enough so that it can be viewed on Youtube and not age restricted. Those animations can have horrible effects on young viewers especially when it comes to EPI. Most of these channels and "child friendly" animations serve as a funnel to the creators more mature works. Worst of all, is that all of those channels have views into the millions to my dismay.
But yeah, @NoCockatrice is kinda retarded if the main point was about body issues.

 

[NoCockatrice]

It's softcore porn of a dude and it shouldn't be on the front page

That was my point

Those animations can have horrible effects on young viewers

Yes, but when female users do it people don't treat it as seriously and I think it's wrong

 

[Kari Kamiya]

@NoCockatrice is a pooner, she's not happy with male standards because she'll never look male.

It's softcore porn of a dude and it shouldn't be on the front page.

How is it softcore if he's still wearing pants? How do you know it's softcore, you found the original source? I'm honestly confused about what the issue with this character is when I'm not seeing anything sexual about it.

(It does look like one of those Shorts, though, which is always cancer no matter what, so I'm just going off the thumbnail.)

 

[NoCockatrice]

I'm honestly confused about what the issue with this character is when I'm not seeing anything sexual about it

Honestly, I hate the so called jelly art style specifically so it made me MATI when it popped up on my front page

Jelly art style is quite often used by gooners though

I guess I oversperged

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

It does have that artstyle of "pornbrain artist" who likes to draw futanari artwork or some dysgenic looking humanoid, and people who use that as cropped youtube thumbnail.

 

[The man The only man]

How is it softcore if he's still wearing pants? How do you know it's softcore, you found the original source? I'm honestly confused about what the issue with this character is when I'm not seeing anything sexual about it.

Are you pretending to be retarded or are you genuinely retarded? It's gooner art for women, the appeal to that character is its sexual appeal, that's it and nothing more. There is no story in the original source, its just an erotic character. Furthermore, sexuality isn't simply defined by your autistic specifications like "Does it have pants on?" or "Is the original source actual porn?". Sexuality is a wide spectrum so it can never be precisely defined with words or specifications. Simply, if you didn't get a boner from it then congratulate yourself for at least not being a faggot.

 

[dick brain]

Are you pretending to be retarded or are you genuinely retarded? It's gooner art for women, the appeal to that character is its sexual appeal, that's it and nothing more. There is no story in the original source, its just an erotic character. Furthermore, sexuality isn't simply defined by your autistic specifications like "Does it have pants on?" or "Is the original source actual porn?". Sexuality is a wide spectrum so it can never be precisely defined with words or specifications. Simply, if you didn't get a boner from it then congratulate yourself for at least not being a faggot.

>tfw all those superhero comics I read as a kid were actually just gooner art for women

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Are you pretending to be retarded or are you genuinely retarded? It's gooner art for women, the appeal to that character is its sexual appeal, that's it and nothing more. There is no story in the original source, its just an erotic character. Furthermore, sexuality isn't simply defined by your autistic specifications like "Does it have pants on?" or "Is the original source actual porn?". Sexuality is a wide spectrum so it can never be precisely defined with words or specifications. Simply, if you didn't get a boner from it then congratulate yourself for at least not being a faggot.

I literally asked for proof that it's actually pornographic in nature because that type of artwork and character design doesn't automatically mean it's supposed to be pornographic. I don't know what the fuck has happened to make women want to literally lust after orcs outside of "Does he have pecs? Yeees~" or whatever, but if your first thought at seeing a green-skinned orc is "Oh my God, that's porn" and then you immediately flip out over someone questioning that thought-process, that sounds like projection, my man. Calm thine man-tits.

Seriously, you can draw hunky characters (human or non-human) without wanting to goon to it. It could've just been a spoof on female fantasy for all I know, that's why I wanted context.

 

[Paper Machete]

It's sort of vague but yeah a lot of the time those "characters" just exist as a sort of romantic/sexual ideal and are not even part of any serious world building or story/comic the person obsessing over drawing them is. It's not healthy to obsess over stuff like that all the time but it is on the shallower end of things.

What sort of stuff does that person also draw or do? Are they an actual gooner or are they just obsessing over their "ideal" in a fantasy way rather than putting that energy and interest into actual relationships? It might be unhealthy or cringe or lame but not necessarily what this thread is about.

 

[SalmaoneSlaamper]

This thread makes me think about my old baby sitter who always had a smut book with her and would read them constantly.

 

[escampar]

The 'Gooniversary' (Documentary Trailer) by Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan

Sounds like a funny watch. Ironically, I checked, primarily-porn intended, Kemono and it seems delayed. Anyone got an alternative? Didn't check torrents... Patreon Downloader requires actually using Patreon ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[Trollistic]

What’s the difference between watching your wife’s boyfriend banging her and watching some random people have sex shown on porno? One watches them fuck irl while the other watches them fuck in the computer screen!