Paid her employees a dollar

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Dołączono
14 Lis 2012
e5a35fff3d1355b83a7f43fa35634fa5716aeff169da724d862010ac39b04177.jpg


"The value of a day's work? To Brianna Wu, one dollar."
 
e5a35fff3d1355b83a7f43fa35634fa5716aeff169da724d862010ac39b04177.jpg


"The value of a day's work? To Brianna Wu, one dollar."

"Wu claims to be for the people and against corporate interests, yet was more than willing to use the same practices in her own business. Do you want such greed running your district?"
 
e5a35fff3d1355b83a7f43fa35634fa5716aeff169da724d862010ac39b04177.jpg


"The value of a day's work? To Brianna Wu, one dollar."

They actually got paid more than that, though.

I think it was a pretty pointless wording for the contract, though. The reason you use that in a real estate contract is you don't want the actual selling price as a public record attached to the deed in the recorder's office that anyone can look at. I don't even know if that's an issue any more, though. It seems to be the kind of thing some contract drafters still do because they've done it forever.

If anyone actually knows why you would use this language in an employment contract, I'd be fascinated.
 
Bri being a bit hypocritical as usual...this statement doesn't sound like it should come from someone who would deliberately dodge putting a fair wage for their employees in writing:

BriWu1.JPG
 
They actually got paid more than that, though.

I think it was a pretty pointless wording for the contract, though. The reason you use that in a real estate contract is you don't want the actual selling price as a public record attached to the deed in the recorder's office that anyone can look at. I don't even know if that's an issue any more, though. It seems to be the kind of thing some contract drafters still do because they've done it forever.

If anyone actually knows why you would use this language in an employment contract, I'd be fascinated.
(Bear in mind I'm not American and live under completely different laws)

That practice (low base salary + bonuses) can be used to con workers out of their legitimate benefits. For example, a worker's retirement or severance packagr would be proportional to the his official salary, not taking any bonus into account.

Wu scams her workers, don't get scammed tu.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole