Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Głosy: 978 45,7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Głosy: 277 12,9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Głosy: 885 41,4%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    2 140
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
1604648647762.png

Looks like we're in the final stretch for GA.
 
Oh Biden is going to flip GA with like a 95% probability. Question really is by how much. It's looking like it'll shake out to be by 1000 - 4000 or so, give or take.
I think Trump can keep GA with the last-minute military vote, but he's still going to lose.
 
I think Trump can keep GA with the last-minute military vote, but he's still going to lose.
Anything is possible at this point, all I know is that shit doesn't add up.

Just because he's a doomer and a lolcow doesn't make him incorrect. I enjoy him once in a while but I don't take him too seriously for the most part.

Supreme Court or bust!
 
Because once they're counted it's literally impossible to remove them from the count. the only recourse is another election, and then what? keep doing it until the anomalies go away? the only answer is to have a basically fair election the first time.

Oh and Nate "Silver" would be considered an expert witness in a statistical court case. Just imagine!
Now I'm just more surprised we don't have any laws/procedures in place to correct voter fraud even if there's evidence of it. Thanks for the answer.
Seriously, this seems like a giant flaw if anyone can just rig the vote and get away with it if no one notices in time.
 
Why didn't Trump capitalized on letting the Dems count every vote then pointing out the statistical anomalies in them as evidence? It was right there but some retard thought it would be a great idea to make them stop the count instead (even if it was just so they could watch them count). The reported numbers are enough to get the ball rolling on a law suit but instead he pretty much killed all his momentum by looking panicked and un-democratic.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"
Because those statistical anomalies can be explained away by one side and the only way to get actual solid evidence of it that would have any real chance at the courts invalidating ballots over it is to actually catch it in the act on video.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole