Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Głosy: 978 45,7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Głosy: 277 12,9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Głosy: 885 41,4%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    2 140
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
If Texas goes blue that's the fucking end of Texas itself as we know it. Might as well rename it East California.
0695A9A0-68DB-4D31-A9DD-7BF343772CE3.jpeg

Hank Hill sympathizes with you
 
Let's be real. If the pollsters accurately reported the truth about what they were told by people they ask who they voted for "Get Fucked, Commie Faggot" would be the lead in every election for the last 40 years.
 
Biden up by less than half a percent in Ohio now

Blue mirage is real
 
The Wheel Chair Chad has given his first speech as the youngest member of Congress.
 

Załączniki

  • CryMore.PNG
    CryMore.PNG
    17,2 KB · Wyświetlenia: 79
I feel like these glitches on pretty much all maps and media sources are a feature not a big. If the source of information becomes doubtful then it's easy to "correct" later without people questioning it.
I think the Dems game plan is to cause as much uncertainty of the results as they can. It would give them more time to fuck with the end conclusion (as the courts sort stuff out) and give plausibility to their claim they won. Just lost due to interference.
 
100% serious:
Neither. Null's doomposting is retarded. The Internet flat out cannot function without 230. Websites being sued for random shitposts or online shopping fraud would destroy every online business that operates in America, and nobody wants that.
However, Joe Biden and the Democrats want to add a caveat to 230 where websites will lose their protections if they don't "protect minorities and vulnerable groups". In other words, if you're allowed to say "nigger" then no 230 protection.
Meanwhile, Trump wants to actually enforce 230 and punish websites that editorialize non-illegal content. There is absolutely no reason for Youtube to put a warning label on every video that mentions the Moon Landing, as if we're all just incapable of reasoning for ourselves. If someone wants to rant about fake moon landings, they're legally allowed to and any website that prevents them from doing so should be treated as a publisher and not as a neutral entity.
glad to see you post non bait friend. Pretty funny watching people freak out on you though.
 
Oh look, I have my pizza AND Ohio and Texas are both red.

LOL at the Democrats of peace being BIG MAD at the KKKubans right now.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole