No Kikes vs No Pajeets? - Which would be a better world?

[Chiang Kai-shek]

You have to get rid of one these of groups of people. Would the world be better without Jews or would it be better without Indians?

 

[eatler]

Jews because…… you know.

 

[DOUBLE_WHEEL]

Jews are infinitely more useful than poos.

 

[Gangstalker #32194]

im really torn on this but im going to have to say jews

 

[Crocodylus Acutus]

I can't decide!

 

[Huh what?]

Jews are the root of the problem. Yes, Pajeets are nasty but they wouldn't have a presence in the West without the Jews

 

[parsnip]

Lets just get rid of everyone and start over.

 

[Alex Hogendorp]

Jews easily. Without them, poojeets wouldn't come here.

 

[gamerweeb1]

Can I choose Muslims instead?

They have done more damage to the world than Jews and pajeets combined.

 

[*Grunts Softly*]

jews

 

[Johnny Salami]

Pajeets. There are 1.6 billion of them in poop land alone. Plus you free up that real-estate then the Jews have no excuse about whotw counties having to take on refugees. I honestly see Jewish influence waining due to Zoomers not caring about Israel.

 

[Cathy May 15 cant sing]

Honestly if the Kikes are gone the problem would be solve!! They cause terror and mass migration to Europe so I'm pro Palestine!
Give jews too much power and see how they behave... Look at New York: complains about landlords, you see only jewish names and that's just the tip of the iceBERG...

Wyświetl załącznik 1712048415883.webp

 

[DotDem]

Jeets, hard to think with that stench.