UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
Don’t worry janny, I’ll reply to your thread!

Here’s some Reddit trannies melting down.


PoggleRebecca 145 points 5 hours ago

Gender Criticals like to push the conspiracy that all trans people are actually just autistic rather than "actually trans", which might be why they're doing this.

They aren't going to be testing cis kids at the same rate and so will go undetected in a lot of cases, so the rate of autistic trans kids will be artificially inflated, which helps to justify their conspiracy.

MiddleAgedMartianDog 43 points 5 hours ago*

Even if they were, so the f what? (to be clear directing my anger at GCs only) Just because someone has two things that are correlated - even if they were causally linked - doesn’t mean people don’t need care an attention for BOTH of them. It shows their transphobia is combined with the worst dehumanising kind of ableism. They of course don’t believe either of these things are real or care about actual people’s suffering, which is why their only answer to BOTH is conversion therapy / compliance torture.

AccurateMolasses2748 75 points 5 hours ago

They also will investigate family life to look for trauma and identify the child's orientation. So we are at the stage where children can't be trans they must have cognitive issues suggesting they aren't competent (because apparently that's where we are heading for autistic people), you were traumatised by your family, or you are actually gay. This is a terrifying world.
 
Last edited:
At least reddit's good for some laughs sometimes.
Yep. I have ADHD and I’m a month away from an ASD assessment (which I’m not in a position of cancelling as it would corroborate my PIP application). I’ve been transitioning for 3+ years, I’m post top surgery, and I’m still mentally preparing to having to switch to DIY very soon.

What to call this other than eugenics, I wonder?
Further down in the article, they are also evaluating "whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction".

Is it me or is that unnecessarily medicalising language for what's your sexuality?

And isn't this a terf talking point not a professional medical one, that if kids are straight and trans, well actually no, you're probably "proto-gay" and need talk therapy for your "internalised homophobia", delaying transition even longer?
>Further down in the article, they are also evaluating "whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction".

What the fuck? Who the fuck do they think they are, the Mormon Church? I've literally never heard that language used to refer to realizing that you may be bi or gay outside of religious, conversion therapy-inclined settings. So that's super reassuring.

They're really going all-in on rolling everything back to the '70s.
being autistic inherently doesnt affect you

being autstic in an environment of non austistics affects you

imagine youre autistic with bullying haunting you and having little connection to your peers because your brain is just different and doesnt connect with the social aspects.

its conceivable that there are people who might see theyre lack of belonging to their gender peers as an inherent gender issue in themselves. This is where the simple act of giving someone an insight suggestion and them having a check-in based on this suggestion could help them decide theyre nonbinary or just don't want to conform, which could make their lives much easier transition wise later on... or just say no and thats that and transition could be aided.

Im well aware of the whole "make them anything but trans stick" and the lonnng history of the whole transness is misunderstood gayness thing, the difference with this and that is that one short nod to give someone insight doesnt equal conversion therapy as it maintains choice and respect.

if an autistic person presents with significant transition desire, and there isn't anything which could affect their insight... I don't think theres even a reason to mention anything and the clinician should just make a mental note and move past autism there and then.

we're on about x means y but if y is present with m, z must be examined levels of logic, it gets complex.

Gender identity services should tbh be a secondary services after GPs (and also divided into complex and run of the mill cases), and this process would be actually justifiable time-wise but thats another issue.
 
children can't be trans they must have cognitive issues suggesting they aren't competent (because apparently that's where we are heading for autistic people), you were traumatised by your family, or you are actually gay.
I mean, yes.
Quite literally all of that is true. Children are not competent to understand anything medical and if they're 'trans' then it's quite likely they are autistic, traumatized or groomed, or gay with a complex about it.
 
Back