N A R U v2 wants to enforce the forum rules

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

To chat with my cute alleged girlfriend of the unrequited love interest variety.

You don't need Steam to talk to people.

Also because I paid for many of them, few of which were refunded.

Why did you pay for a Steam account if you don't own a computer?

 

[N A R U v2]

Why did you pay for a Steam account if you don't own a computer?

I owned a computer when I first started commenting in the steam community news section, for which I was targeted by Kiwi farms and 0 1 was promoted to janniehood, only to subsequently relegate his duties of moderating the subject of his derision onto @Trombonista for reasons as yet unexplained.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

I owned a computer when I first started commenting in the steam community news section, for which I was targeted by Kiwi farms and 0 1 was promoted to janniehood, only to subsequently relegate his duties of moderating the subject of his derision onto @Trombonista for reasons as yet unexplained.

And you used this Steam account to schizopost on Steam News, rather than play games?

You don't need Steam to talk to people.

Why did you ignore this part of my post? You're telling me you supposedly cared about this person, but you couldn't even be bothered to get her phone number, or at least an alternative way to talk to outside of a gaming app you don't even use for gaming?

 

[N A R U v2]

And you used this Steam account to schizopost on Steam News, rather than play games?

I did both. As us expected to be done with Steam. Unlike as is expected to be done with the epic games store, which does not have a community forums section.

Why did you ignore this part of my post? You're telling me you supposedly cared about this person, but you couldn't even be bothered to get her phone number, or at least an alternative way to talk to outside of a gaming app you don't even use for gaming?

Nobody expects to be blacklisted from steam for opposing Nuremberg code violations. Not even self-proclaimed professional tier [precognitive] reality warping eldritch horror (LARPers(?)).

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

I did both. As us expected to be done with Steam. Unlike as is expected to be done with the epic games store, which does not have a community forums section.

So, schizoposting is an integral part of Steam platform? Fascinating.

Nobody expects to be blacklisted from steam for opposing Nuremberg code violations. Not even self-proclaimed professional tier [precognitive] reality warping eldritch horror (LARPers(?)).

You didn't expect to get banned from a platform for breaking its rules? Boy, you are dumb. That doesn't excuse the part where you failed to obtain this person's phone number anyway.

 

[N A R U v2]

You didn't expect to get banned from a platform for breaking its rules? Boy, you are dumb. That doesn't excuse the part where you failed to obtain this person's phone number anyway.

Steam doesn't have rules. The "rules" steam does have are arbitrarily enforced depending on how any particular Valve employee determines they should be enforced at any given moment. There is no way to break the rules or to adhere to them as such, and they are more appropriately described as guidelines than rules.

Which is also why Nexon was allowed to violate Steam's storefront rules against review manipulation.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

Steam doesn't have rules. The "rules" steam does have are arbitrarily enforced depending on how any particular Valve employee determines they should be enforced at any given moment. There is no way to break the rules or to adhere to them as such, and they are more appropriately described as guidelines than rules.

Which is also why Nexon was allowed to violate Steam's storefront rules against review manipulation.

Oh, ok, I must've hallucinated the TOS, thank you.

 

[N A R U v2]

Oh, ok, I must've hallucinated the TOS, thank you.

You apparently did, because Valve broke the law by refusing to attempt to reach an informal agreement with me before I initiated arbitration prior to altering their tos to require me to settle our dispute in court otherwise.

It's either that or rules don't exist on steam and Valve is a repeat offender of misleading or deceiving their customers about their legal rights.

'

Full Federal Court confirms that Valve misled gamers​

Date​

22 December 2017

“The Full Court also upheld the finding that Valve made misleading representations about consumer guarantees and that certain terms and conditions in the Steam subscriber agreements and refund policies were false or misleading.” ...'

https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-confirms-that-valve-misled-gamers

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

You apparently did, because Valve broke the law

Yeah, cool, have fun with your DOJ complaints and all that.

Anyway, I will help you get in contact with your e-girlfriend. You see, there are these things called idlers for Steam, for people who want to collect the trading cards without actually playing the games. Lucky for you, they also come in phone app forms. You can just idle some f2p games for your posting privileges. Now, go and get her, tiger.

 

[LoverofPi]

I'm saying considering the circumstances under which I'm currently posting, I face the threat of retaliation from Kiwi Farmers.

You're more likely to face "retaliation" from the woman you call your girlfriend than any random farmer. You're also not having your sixth amendment rights violated for not getting a speedy trial for a suit you tried to initiate and which you readily associate with. You've grossly misunderstood both the amendment and the commentary about it being tested.
The rights it grants are afforded specifically to criminal defendants. The boundaries of these rights are tested by witness protection.
You can attempt to sue as a john doe, but good luck getting a court to agree to that after openly declaring your intention to sue for years at a time.

Steam is not a dating app, maybe you should try OkCupid instead. Or going outside.

Those involve people seeing his face. With steam he can keep that out of the equation. It's also easier to blame Steam Moderation than his stalking target would be beau's lack of interest.

Nobody expects to be blacklisted from steam for opposing Nuremberg code violations. Not even self-proclaimed professional tier [precognitive] reality warping eldritch horror (LARPers(?)).

Well, good news. You were banned for repeating nonsense about made up violations of the nuremburg code, not because you opposed them, and for being annoying. More good news, you're not a professional, not precognitive, cannot warp reality at all, and not even remotely eldritch or horrific. Heck, you're probably only role playing this nonsense online so there's no "Live Action" component.
Congrats, Naru, you're a role player. Roll for stats, you're playing F.A.T.A.L.

You apparently did, because Valve broke the law by refusing to attempt to reach an informal agreement with me before I initiated arbitration prior to altering their tos to require me to settle our dispute in court otherwise.

If you had not yet initiated the arbitration process, and they changed their TOS and you agreed to them, how did they violate the law, exactly?

 

[N A R U v2]

If you had not yet initiated the arbitration process, and they changed their TOS and you agreed to them, how did they violate the law, exactly?

I had initiated the arbitration process by sending Valve a notice of arbitration and had been awaiting a good faith effort at reaching an informal agreement from Valve prior to initiating arbitration as required by Valve's legally binding terms of conflict resolution at the time.

Valve then arbitrarily updated the terms of conflict resolution to require any dispute being resolved in court without upholding their end of the agreement to attempt to reach an informal agreement before either party initiated arbitration.

 

[LoverofPi]

I had initiated the arbitration process by sending Valve a notice of arbitration and had been awaiting a good faith effort at reaching an informal agreement from Valve prior to initiating arbitration as required by Valve's legally binding terms of conflict resolution at the time.

Valve then arbitrarily updated the terms of conflict resolution to require any dispute being resolved in court without upholding their end of the agreement to attempt to reach an informal agreement before either party initiated arbitration.

Nothing to say about the woman you fancy not fancying you back or how you aren't a criminal defendant and thus the sixth amendment is irrelevant to your case? No? just this?

As for waiting for arbitration, your supposed suit is entirely about feeling unfairly banned, yes?

While that's already an incredibly specious reason to sue or seek arbitration, have you made a Steam account since Nov 1 or 2024?

 

[N A R U v2]

Nothing to say about the woman you fancy not fancying you back or how you aren't a criminal defendant and thus the sixth amendment is irrelevant to your case? No? just this?

It's Black's place to say how she feels. Not mine or yours, but it is awful telling how eager you are to speak authoritatively on the behalf of others.

If the sixth amendment is irrelevant to my case, all that does is show how much more favorable the American justice system is to criminals than victims of repeat offenders like Valve.

As for waiting for arbitration, your supposed suit is entirely about feeling unfairly banned, yes?

No.

While that's already an incredibly specious reason to sue or seek arbitration, have you made a Steam account since Nov 1 or 2024?

Let's say that I have.

Your argument is that Valve has the legal right to violate the law because they retroactively updated their terms of service to exonerate their crimes they were found guilty of on previous occasions by a foreign government's judicial system.

Thomas Jefferson famously said "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."

And it's hard to imagine anything more tyrannical than rules for thee but not for me being enforced by the highest branches of the judicial system.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

It's Black's place to say how she feels. Not mine or yours, but it is awful telling how eager you are to speak authoritatively on the behalf of others.

Oh, so it is Black we're talking about here. With how much you talked about her liking you, you almost managed to convince me it's somebody else, considering how "great" your last public discussions with her in the Halo group went. Well, you're right, only Black can say how she feels, but it's safe for the rest of us to make the educated guess that she feels like you're a mentally ill loser. But I see you managed to convince yourself otherwise.

As a side note, I was under impression that Black is a lesbian, but it must be that she was just so utterly repulsed by you in particular.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Did you forget I've already posted archived evidence of @Null calling for the harassment of people he dislikes in violation of everything Kiwi farms stands for (in his own words)?

Look dude, I'm not gonna even mention you off site. And I'd bet that the other 3 or 4 people that actively post in the thread won't either. I don't do off site harassment, regardless of Null calling for harassment.

I personally don't think you're a bad guy, there are plenty of things I agree with you about but you're very obsessive about them. That's your prerogative, but I think obsessing over the these things are unhealthy. Like if I did the same, I think it would drive me crazy.

 

[Butwhythough2]

If the sixth amendment is irrelevant to my case, all that does is show how much more favorable the American justice system is to criminals than victims of repeat offenders like Valve.

You said you were Canadian, so the US Constitution doesn't apply here, also this would be a civil case and not a criminal case. The sixth amendment doesn't apply to civil cases, only criminal.

 

[LoverofPi]

It's Black's place to say how she feels. Not mine or yours, but it is awful telling how eager you are to speak authoritatively on the behalf of others.

I thought Black made it very clear how little she thought of you the last several times you interacted.

If the sixth amendment is irrelevant to my case, all that does is show how much more favorable the American justice system is to criminals than victims of repeat offenders like Valve.

It'd be a civil suit. The 6th Amendment covers criminal cases. Plus you'd be the plaintiff.

No.

What then?

Let's say that I have.

Your argument is that Valve has the legal right to violate the law because they retroactively updated their terms of service to exonerate their crimes they were found guilty of on previous occasions by a foreign government's judicial system.

Before anything else, I want to point out the hilarious contradiction of "legal right to violate the law" and point out that no one can exonerate their crimes, they are exonerated of crimes.
Anyways, what I am saying is that while EULAs are hardly legally binding either way, use of their service does require agreeing to them, which now includes verbiage about seeking legal redress via the US legal system in a specific venue.

Thomas Jefferson famously said "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."

And it's hard to imagine anything more tyrannical than rules for thee but not for me being enforced by the highest branches of the judicial system.

But now the company is going through the same legal channels as everyone else and allowing the civil judicial system to judge cases instead of an arbitration firm.

You said you were Canadian, so the US Constitution doesn't apply here, also this would be a civil case and not a criminal case. The sixth amendment doesn't apply to civil cases, only criminal.

Him being a Canuck doesn't make a difference here, actually. It'd be a civil suit either way, and he doesn't live in Canada any more based on his hurricane rants putting him in western NC/ Eastern Tennessee. You are correct about the 6th not applying to civil cases.

 

[N A R U v2]

Look dude, I'm not gonna even mention you off site. And I'd bet that the other 3 or 4 people that actively post in the thread won't either. I don't do off site harassment, regardless of Null calling for harassment.

I personally don't think you're a bad guy, there are plenty of things I agree with you about but you're very obsessive about them. That's your prerogative, but I think obsessing over the these things are unhealthy. Like if I did the same, I think it would drive me crazy.

Do me a favor and take over on trying to hold nuremberg code violators accountable for me then.

Do you see anyone else trying?

Do you think no one trying will prevent further violations from snowballing out of control?

Do you enjoy the idea of being the next martin niemoller?

You said you were Canadian, so the US Constitution doesn't apply here, also this would be a civil case and not a criminal case. The sixth amendment doesn't apply to civil cases, only criminal.

I've also repeatedly pointed out how you keep making wildly incorrect assumptions about me because you self-admittedly refuse to devote what little attention span you have to reading my actual statements.

Maybe sit out on commenting about me until you're able to rectify that ongoing problem if you're serious about trying to offer me advice.

You're not contributing anything productive by willfully spreading false information about me or my claims in the process.

You're also not giving Christians a very good name by engaging in slander and idle gossip, but we've already been over that and so I assume that's your intent at this point.

Or you just avoided reading the Bible verses I've already provided on the matter as deftly as you've avoided reading my actual statements.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Martin Luther would be rolling in his grave to see what his 95 theses accomplished for the church, let me fail to tell you once again.

Before anything else, I want to point out the hilarious contradiction of "legal right to violate the law" and point out that no one can exonerate their crimes, they are exonerated of crimes.
Anyways, what I am saying is that while EULAs are hardly legally binding either way, use of their service does require agreeing to them, which now includes verbiage about seeking legal redress via the US legal system in a specific venue.

That's a lot of words just to say that is indeed what your argument is.

If you had not yet initiated the arbitration process, and they changed their TOS and you agreed to them, how did they violate the law, exactly?

While that's already an incredibly specious reason to sue or seek arbitration, have you made a Steam account since Nov 1 or 2024?

Let's say that I have.

Your argument is that Valve has the legal right to violate the law because they retroactively updated their terms of service to exonerate their crimes they were found guilty of on previous occasions by a foreign government's judicial system.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Do me a favor and take over on trying to hold nuremberg code violators accountable for me then.

Your touch lights the way!

You're also not giving Christians a very good name by engaging in slander and idle gossip, but we've already been over that and so I assume that's your intent at this point.

Im very disappointed in you Naru, O' ye hypocrite, don't you remember calling me a pedophile several pages back? Remember all the insults you've given others in the thread? You even insulted me later on in the same post. That's idle gossip and slander, you're no better than any of us in this thread. You think you're better than any of us, but no you're a hypocrite.

Once again, I wasn't intending on being an asshole and flaming you. I was going to be nice because you're pretty interesting and wanted to know more about things you do outside of being hyper fixated on your crusade against Valve.

 

[N A R U v2]

Your touch lights the way!

Im very disappointed in you Naru, O' ye hypocrite, don't you remember calling me a pedophile several pages back? Remember all the insults you've given others in the thread? You even insulted me later on in the same post. That's idle gossip and slander, you're no better than any of us in this thread. You think you're better than any of us, but no you're a hypocrite.

Once again, I wasn't intending on being an asshole and flaming you. I was going to be nice because you're pretty interesting and wanted to know more about things you do outside of being hyper fixated on your crusade against Valve.

That's truly all very unfortunate.

But I'm done. Have fun trying to find anyone else who will vocally oppose all of our rights being destroyed during the next attack on our freedoms, because it won't be an easy ask after how you've treated me.

I'll be deleting my password manager containing my Kiwi farms login info now, so I'm afraid you will never see what answer the DOJ gives me after all.

o7

"I am, now as before, of the opinion that I did the best that I could do for my nation. I therefore do not regret my conduct and will bear the consequences that result from my conduct."

-Sophie Scholl