US Millions lose food stamps under Trump cuts. Arizona is hardest hit

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Millions lose food stamps under Trump cuts. Arizona is hardest hit Article | Archive

By Leah Douglas and Erica Stapleton
June 24, 20265:05 AM CDT Updated 8 hours ago
  • Half of Arizona's SNAP participants have lost their benefits
  • Trump changes to the safety-net program push more costs onto states
  • Food pantries in Arizona say they are seeing more demand since the changes went into effect
WASHINGTON/PHOENIX, Arizona, June 24 (Reuters) - When Angelica Garcia tried to renew her food stamps this spring, she said she thought she knew the drill.

The single mother of three in Tucson filled out the application. She repeatedly called Arizona’s Department of Economic Security, the state agency administering the federal aid, often staying on hold until the line dropped. She visited a thinly staffed DES office and waited hours for a caseworker.

By the time Garcia was reapproved in June, she’d missed two months of benefits while her family got by on food-pantry donations and cheap ‌staples like beans, rice and tortillas.

“There’s hoops to jump through — always,” said Garcia, who has used food stamps in the state for three years. But now the government is “adding more hoops.”

More than 4.7 million people nationwide have lost their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, also known as food stamps, since President Donald Trump’s signature tax and spending law took effect last July, according to data through March from the U.S. Department of Agriculture — about 11% of participants.

Nowhere have the changes to America’s second-largest social safety-net program taken hold as rapidly as in Arizona, where the number of SNAP recipients has fallen by about half, the steepest drop in the country.

That means lost benefits for more than 457,000 Arizonans, including nearly 196,000 children, according to DES data as of the end of May.

Arizona SNAP enrollment has fallen faster than any other state​

Between March 2025 and March 2026, food stamp enrollment in Arizona declined by more than half, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
1782328440020.png

The law reduces SNAP funding by $187 billion, or about 17%, over the next 10 years, in part by expanding work requirements and barring some immigrants from receiving benefits.

It also imposes penalties on states that fail to meet certain performance standards beginning in October next year. And it shifts more administrative costs onto states.

Among the reasons enrollment ⁠has fallen so steeply in Arizona is that the state has moved to implement the federal changes more quickly than other states, according to two SNAP experts and the DES spokesperson, Brett Bezio.

"Arizona has no choice but to meet these requirements," Liliana Soto, press secretary for Democratic Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs, said in an email. "If we don’t comply, we will be fined hundreds of millions of dollars and more vulnerable Arizonans will lose their food assistance."

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the SNAP overhaul “prioritizes American citizens, and implements reasonable cost-sharing measures with states to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse," without offering examples.

The USDA’s Food and Nutrition Administration, which administers SNAP, attributed the decline in enrollment in part to the work requirement changes.

RECORD FOOD-PANTRY DEMAND​

The SNAP cuts have driven a record number of people to food banks in Arizona, according to the Arizona Food Bank Network, a statewide organization that works with local pantries.

About 843,000 Arizonans sought support from a food pantry in April, about an 8% increase over 779,000 in April 2025 — and surpassing the number of people receiving SNAP, according to AFBN data. Food bank users fell in May to about 790,000, the data show.

Even so, food pantries are scrambling to fill "a massive gap," said Terri Shoemaker, executive vice president of the AFBN.

DES and the USDA did not comment on the increase in food-bank use.

Arizona food bank users outpace SNAP recipients​

More people are turning to food banks amid the food stamp decline in Arizona, according to data from the Arizona Food Bank Network.
1782328472547.png

Myriam Flores, a mother of seven in Phoenix, said in a May interview she was unable to renew her access to SNAP and lost $1,100 a month in benefits in January.

She said she spent hours on hold with Arizona’s DES, only for calls to drop.

At the time of her interview, she said she visits the St. Vincent de Paul pantry in Phoenix nearly every day so she can feed her children.

"There are nights of crying, ‌nights of not ⁠sleeping, when I lose sleep at 2 a.m. doing the math, deciding what to pay for and what to put off," she said.

Reuters could not determine whether Flores has resumed her efforts to get benefits or whether she's currently eligible.

‘FALLING THROUGH THE CRACKS’​

Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said that the longer wait times are partly the result of stricter processes for vetting applicants, introduced by Arizona’s state agency to meet the new performance standards and avoid financial penalties.

“They can’t get through on the overloaded phone line, or they’re being asked for more and more paperwork that they can’t provide, or they do provide it but the state doesn’t have capacity to process it,” she said.

Those standards grew out of the state’s SNAP error rate — a measure of overpayments and underpayments of food stamp benefits.

Arizona’s error rate in 2024 was 8.84%, below the national average of 10.9%, but still above the 6% threshold that — under the new law — ⁠would require states to cover up to 15% of the cost of SNAP benefits. Historically, the federal government has paid the full cost of benefits.

That could cost Arizona about $201.5 million next year, according to the DES 2027 budget request.

To avoid the threat of “significant financial penalties,” DES has tightened its application process by requiring documentation like pay stubs or leases, Bezio said.


Arizona SNAP participation has dropped by half since last year​

President Trump's tax and spending law, which went into effect in July 2025, was a key factor in people losing benefits, according to experts.
1782328560653.png

Cindy Bernardo, a program manager at the St. Vincent de Paul pantry, said many of the organization's clients have faced delays or lost their SNAP benefits as the state enacts the federal changes.

“So many of them have lost their benefits,” she said. “And they have reapplied, and most of them can't even ⁠get an answer to their questions.”

The federal law also expanded work requirements to areas that previously had waivers because of high unemployment or insufficient jobs.

Fourteen of Arizona's 15 counties are now subject to work requirements, compared to just one last year, said Joseph Palomino, director of the Arizona Center for Economic Progress.

Those changes, as well as the new demands for documentation, are making it harder for people to get timely access to benefits, he said, and they’re “falling through the cracks."

Bezio said the agency is hiring more staff and contracting with a third-party call center to improve wait times.

SNAP CUTS ROLL OUT NATIONWIDE​

Other ⁠states are recording steep drops in SNAP enrollment: 17.4% in Louisiana, 11.6% in Wyoming and 13.7% in Virginia, USDA data show.

The USDA's FNA said states are responsible for accurately implementing the federal changes, and that it has issued guidance to help them meet new requirements.

The Louisiana Department of Health did not respond to a request for comment.

The Wyoming Department of Family Services said "a large portion" of the state's decline was due to the federal changes.

In Virginia, SNAP enrollment fell 12% in the year ending in March, according to the Department of Social Services.

"The primary impact of this law on the Commonwealth is that now more families are going hungry when nobody should have to go hungry," said spokesperson Michael Pulley.

Reporting by Leah Douglas in Washington and Erica Stapleton in Phoenix; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Suzanne Goldenberg
 
That is absolutely insane. Especially since NPR has been telling everyone for 20 years that it's just a tiny little supplemental amount to squeak by, even as we watch welfare sows load up separate Costco carts for the double-breaded deep fried shit they can buy on SNAP, and the stuff they begrudgingly pay for in cash.
That’s because there are TWO programs at work here, SNAP which is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or ‘food’ and TANF which is Temporary Assistance for Needy Families which is ‘lol we’ll just give you money hell you can even withdraw it at an ATM and spend it on diapers and cribs and weed and vodka we actually don’t check’.

Also the Temporary is mostly a guideline.
 
Fuck bucket's long since empty here, sports fans.

If I had a nickel for every rage-baiting video by a 'SNAP recipient' seen on YouTube I'd be rich. These people, of all races, flaunt the benefits they get, show us all the junk food they bought with OUR tax dollars. The two most despised are the white woman with no upper teeth, says she has six kids, four or five baby daddies, says she gets no child support, and the black woman who says she has nine kids and is pregnant with triplets. Then we'll add all the people who put their food bank hauls on YouTube, apparently flaunting all they have been given.

Believe every SNAP recipient should have to recertify twice a year, and if they are pregnant again, can't provide paperwork, cut off the benefits. SNAP needs to go only to the elderly, disabled veterans, and those able-bodied people in temporary, documented need. Max for everyone except elderly and disabled vets should be two years on SNAP. Hey, go to the food bank, they hand out all sorts of shit, even when you drive there in a shiny new car, as we saw during the 'pandemic'. While nobody really minds helping people in genuine need, they are beyond tired of subsidizing people's irresponsible behavior.
 
Myriam Flores, a mother of seven in Phoenix,
Seven kids oh my God. People won’t even have one or two kids because it’s too expensive. Seven kids, obviously no dad, all funded by the hard work of everyone who saves and sighs about a life they wish they could have if they weren’t so strangled and squeezed by the government for every penny. And you want me to feel sorry? I feel sorry the system incentivized you for this kind of behavior but it’s just unacceptable and has to stop.
 
The state of government aid in our country is fucking horrific, I have no problem with programs in place to take care of impoverished Americans who through no fault of their own end up requiring government assistance. What pisses me off is whenever I read about or see the people actually getting aid, it's almost universally people who should have never gotten anything in the first place, and all the while real Americans that actually need help get fucked and left with nothing. We can feed illegal parasites and their 15+ kids, but we can't do anything for actual Americans who need help, be it due to lifelong health problems or the cost of everyday goods skyrocketing while wages stay the same, in a country with Vets that can't get assistance, these fucking people have no right to any aid from the American taxpayer.
(Edit: phone posting fuck up)
 
I have no problem with programs in place to take care of impoverished Americans who through no fault of their own end up requiring government assistance.
My stance has become this demographic has never existed, even in the modern employment economy. The only type of person to fall into needing welfare was never industrious enough to pull himself out of it in the first place.
 
Fuck bucket's long since empty here, sports fans.

If I had a nickel for every rage-baiting video by a 'SNAP recipient' seen on YouTube I'd be rich. These people, of all races, flaunt the benefits they get, show us all the junk food they bought with OUR tax dollars. The two most despised are the white woman with no upper teeth, says she has six kids, four or five baby daddies, says she gets no child support, and the black woman who says she has nine kids and is pregnant with triplets. Then we'll add all the people who put their food bank hauls on YouTube, apparently flaunting all they have been given.

Believe every SNAP recipient should have to recertify twice a year, and if they are pregnant again, can't provide paperwork, cut off the benefits. SNAP needs to go only to the elderly, disabled veterans, and those able-bodied people in temporary, documented need. Max for everyone except elderly and disabled vets should be two years on SNAP. Hey, go to the food bank, they hand out all sorts of shit, even when you drive there in a shiny new car, as we saw during the 'pandemic'. While nobody really minds helping people in genuine need, they are beyond tired of subsidizing people's irresponsible behavior.
I'd add genuinely disabled people. Its customary for them to get it as part of their benefits package already.
 
If I was a slimy journo writing this article and hoping to sway people to be sympathetic I would have tried my hardest to find people with names that don't sound illegal Hispanic so I don't end up confirming people's view that illegals are leeching off their tax dollars.

Props to the writer for being honest I guess. Or maybe they're just oblivious.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
That is absolutely insane. Especially since NPR has been telling everyone for 20 years that it's just a tiny little supplemental amount to squeak by, even as we watch welfare sows load up separate Costco carts for the double-breaded deep fried shit they can buy on SNAP, and the stuff they begrudgingly pay for in cash.

We shouldn't be subsidising her clown car of a pussy, but comparatively, 1100 a month isnt very much for 7 people. 140 dollars per person, per month. I know people in cali who get like 8 or 900 a month for 4 people.

That and her 7 kids also, probably, get free school lunch.

Just in food, we are spending 20k a year in taxes for this leech. Bet you she is a single mom too
 
Why the fuck not? Why are we rewarding people who have no ability to feed themselves popping out more babies they can’t keep alive without taxpayers stuffing them full of Doritos and Mountain Dew?

I’m so sick of productive Americans not being able to have families because it’s so fucking expensive while these useless parasites just keep breeding and demanding the nation they’re squatting in pay for them to get fat and contribute nothing to humanity.

I get it, but the government doesn't wanna be seen letting children starve. Grown ass adults with no dependents? They can starve though.
 
We shouldn't be subsidising her clown car of a pussy, but comparatively, 1100 a month isnt very much for 7 people. 140 dollars per person, per month. I know people in cali who get like 8 or 900 a month for 4 people.

That and her 7 kids also, probably, get free school lunch.

Just in food, we are spending 20k a year in taxes for this leech. Bet you she is a single mom too
Keep going...likely also Section 8, Medicaid, cash payments, you fucking name it, would say at least 2-3 times that 20K. And for all this we will likely get less than nothing, just more on the margins of society will never do anything useful.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole