Men suck , statistics and research edition - post your favorite statistic debunking common myth about ebils of femalees and goodness of marriage, kids and man in your life

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It seems to me like you're giving every man on the planet credit

That's a reading comprehension issue on your end.

A lot of technology would go by the wayside, for sure, but not housing. I would anticipate the quality of housing being poorer in general, but it is harder to gloat about that.

It's not gloating to point out how stupid it is to pretend that life without men (or women, for that matter) would be better. It's a retarded take, so I pointed out some reasons why.

Here is something women do that men never ever do : give birth and gave you life you are welcome .

Except, I'm not the retard pretending that life without the other gender would be better - that would be you. I appreciate women, and love a number of them. I see gender relationships as more of a yin/yang thing where we complement each others strengths and weaknesses. That's because I'm not retarded though. Don't be retarded.
 
Mythbusting Haggots


Moid Statement 1
suweee.png : SHIIIIET Women age terribly, men age like fine wine and have more value as they age!

Wrong, stalker child!
Men's testostrone, which is often corellated to men's beauty, strenght and fertility
peaks at 19, and then gradually declines afterward

-Men are more likely to age faster between ages of 20-40, they also age the fastest
between 40-50, and eventually age faster into the old age. (Source). They are also
more likely to develop wrinkles 10 years earlier due to having a thicker skin.
Source 1 | 2

- Men are more likely to have a cognitive decline as they age, where as women
display resilience towards it (Source)

-Women have younger brains, around 3 years difference than from men, regardless
their age (Source)

Moid Statement 2
suweee.png : SHIEEEEET MAN WAHMEN SHOULD ONLY HAVE HEALTHY CHILDREN AT THEIR 20S THEIR EGGS ARE IN PEAK PRIME THEN AND GET ROTTEN AND EMPTY N SHIEET AFTER 30, WHILE WE CAN HAVE CHILDREN ANY TIME WITH NO ISSUE

Wrong again, stalker child!

-Men at 35 and above's sperm is 3-4 times more likely to pass down gene mutations to their children, which
increases the risk of children having autism, schizophrenia, hematological cancer, bipolar disorder, increased
miscarriage rate, ADHD, neurological disorders and many more cognitive issues
Sources 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

- 51% of children that were born with a down syndrome are born to a mother who
was under 35 years of age (Source)

-In a recent 2025 study, it's been shown that human egg cells seem to be protected
against some age-related mutations, with the frequency of mutations in mitochondrial
DNA not increasing with age (Source)

-Studies show that there many benefits of kids being born to older mothers.
Benefits such as likelihood of being taller, scoring better on cognitive tests, being
healthier and happier overall. Women that choose to have children later in life,
increase the odds of extending their lives.
Source 1 | 2 | 3

-Children of older fathers have an increased rates of psychiatric diseases
and behavioral impairment (Source).

- Study has shown that IQ of children with older fathers declines per
decade of fathers' age at the time of conception (Source)

Moid Statement 3
suweee.png : I WANT THEM KEEDZ BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE A SYMBOL OF MY LEGACY AND BLOODLINE

Wrong again, stalker child!

-Human DNA preserves the maternal line, women pass down an unbroken genetic chain that can be used
to trace a lineage where as men do not pass that. DNA that's inherited from the mother by the child is passed
down without recombination. (Source)


Moid Statement 4

suweee.png : YOUNGER WAHMEN WANT US OLDER MEN AND BENEFIT GREATLY FROM THIS DYNAMIC SHIEEEEEET

Wrong AGAIN, stalker child!

-Women prefer partners their own age as they age and in case where a male partner is older than the woman in the relationship,
the age gap tends to between 1-3 years. (Source)

-The drastic age gap in relationship has reduced over the years (Source)

-Women under 30 that are paired up with a man at 40 have a lower rate of IVF at 45% than
the opposite, while the opposite has 70% rate of it (Source)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Moid Statement 4
Moid statement 5
RICH OLD MEN WANT AND GET FRESH YOUNG PUSSAY

Moid statement 6
STOOPID GIRLBOSSES SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR A HUSBAND, NOT GET USELESS EDUMACATION

Reality:
In direct contrast to conventional wisdom and most economic models of marital age gaps, we present robust evidence that men and women who are married to differently-aged spouses are negatively selected. Empirical results show lower cognitive ability, lower educational attainment, lower occupational wages, lower earnings, and less attractive appearance among those married to a differently-aged spouse. These results, obtained using samples of first marriages and controlling for age of marriage, are consistent with a model in which individuals with more schooling and more upwardly-mobile occupations interact more heavily with similarly-aged peers and are ultimately more likely to marry similarly-aged spouses.
figure4richmen-2-w640.png smmchart1.webp smmchart2.webp age_gap_income.jpg
 
Inspired by the site's recent thread that started an entire discourse.

MOID STATEMENT
suweee.png : Suweeeeeeeeee, all female school teachers are sexual predators that prey on dem boys!


Wrong stalker child!

Educators who engaged in sexual misconduct were more likely to be male than female
1778965046051.png
Source

Female students are still more likely to be the victims of sexual misconduct committed by educators
1778965304083.png
1778965499859.png
Source
 
Inspired by the site's recent thread that started an entire discourse.

MOID STATEMENT
Wyświetl załącznik 9015302: Suweeeeeeeeee, all female school teachers are sexual predators that prey on dem boys!


Wrong stalker child!

Educators who engaged in sexual misconduct were more likely to be male than female
Wyświetl załącznik 9015311
Source

Female students are still more likely to be the victims of sexual misconduct committed by educators
Wyświetl załącznik 9015347
Wyświetl załącznik 9015363
Source
The narrow focus on female perpetrators makes it obvious that his interest isn't simply raising awareness for male victims, but rather a specific type of CSA (female perpetrator, male victim). It wasn't taking the focus away from male victims for Null to point out that most perpetrators are actually male; it was redirecting the focus to the most common type of abuse that affects boys. Covering exclusively one type of perpetrator while claiming you just want to recognize male victims is dishonest. It's the equivalent of making a post to raise awareness for female rape victims, wherein you exclusively cover cases of rape by white males, and getting mad when someone points out nonwhite males also rape. It's insulting your readers' intelligence to ask them to ignore your obvious agenda and take the information at face value.

Men online often say women have a skewed view of reality because they watch too much true crime, but I've never seen a more obvious example of true crime brain rot. This tranny must watch channels that cover female pedophile teachers 24/7. "I just care about boys" is a weird way to say "my YouTube algorithm suggests me nothing but Christina Formella case updates."
 
The OP seethes about BP constantly, cries about muh men are victums constantly, and hilariously, actually bitches about FAT WOMEN DO CRINGE GENDERWARS while doing nothing but this.
Women do the same thing he does, but in our own spaces where he isn't allowed to be. This makes the troon seethe. In other news, water is wet.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole