💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm convinced that American food producers do this specifically to instill confusion in the minds of their customers.

The US: 90 servings per container, serving size: 1 tablespoon (14g) (example in the screenshot)
Europe and probably everywhere else: 100g or 100ml. Every single time, no exceptions.

It isn't even about metric vs. Imperial. Why can't Americans just use 1 oz. as reference? Who wants to calculate all this shit while shopping?

MATI.mp4_031259.949.jpg
 
You know for a populace that's bad at math you sure love to complicate shit with freedom units
Imperial system is just formalized folk knowledge. An inch is a thumb, your foot is a foot, an acre is how much your horse could plow in a day. One pound equals 16 ounces, a number that is easy to divide mentally for cooking and baking (halves, quarters, eighths). The gallon is divided into 4 quarts, 8 pints, and 128 fluid ounces. Again, easily divided.

The only thing the godless, heckin' science loving metric system gets right is Celsius pegging zero at freezing and 100 at boiling. Being a fucking leaf, I am cursed to use both metric and imperial and to know all conversions between the two by heart. Overwhelmingly we use imperial in daily life - again because it's intuitive and easy to portion. In carpentry it's fantastic since so much is based on body proportions. We only use metric for engineering and the CNC machines, where decimals trump fractions.
 
I'm convinced that American food producers do this specifically to instill confusion in the minds of their customers.
They do. Serving size is not standardized and if you compare two of the same kind of product from different brands, you will often see different serving sizes. Additionally, there's no requirement that single serving packages list their total nutrition, so you will often see small dessert packages advertise 200kcal with "per serving" in small letters and then the little package is 2.5 servings. I have stood in aisles comparing shit like spaghetti because one brand is 83g per serving and the other is 90g and they've got slightly different protein and calories and I'm trying to figure out which is better.

Euros do consumer protection better and it's not even close.
 
They do. Serving size is not standardized and if you compare two of the same kind of product from different brands, you will often see different serving sizes. Additionally, there's no requirement that single serving packages list their total nutrition, so you will often see small dessert packages advertise 200kcal with "per serving" in small letters and then the little package is 2.5 servings. I have stood in aisles comparing shit like spaghetti because one brand is 83g per serving and the other is 90g and they've got slightly different protein and calories and I'm trying to figure out which is better.

Euros do consumer protection better and it's not even close.
Yeah, I'd be pissed if I had to pull out a calculator just to see if something I want to buy doesn't have too much sugar. I wonder if there's some kind of Android software with OCR capable of translating American nutrition fact tables and converting them to something intelligible.

There's another problem where I live, though. Meat producers apparently aren't obligated to tell you how much meat is in food products containing GROUND meat (sausages etc.). So instead of "meat: 98g per 100g", they'll put "100g of this product was made with 130g of meat" on the packaging. It's up to you to figure out what that means.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole