Zoomer Bae powiedział(a):
At what point is a parent allowed to stop financing an adult child who refuses to take responsibility for themselves
I never said they should support him financially. Quite the opposite
Zoomer Bae powiedział(a):
All parents contribute to the person their child grows up to be, but no parent is 100% responsible for the actions of their adult child.
They are when they know full well that said child is a psychotic predator with a stated goal of preying on underage girls and take no action to warn others, let alone to to stop it, as well as actively enabling and making excuses for it. They went so far as to bail him out of him getting on a plane to cross state lines to meet an underage girl he thought existed
I'll say it again. They don't cut him off and forget about him. They keep tabs on him, know exactly what he is doing and are well aware of his intentions toward underage girls, both from what he has publicly stated and from their own history with him. I know they keep tabs on him because that is the only way they could have popped up during the LA incident. They also made a deliberate and very much under the table attempt to bail him out of it - a guy who literally got on a plane and flew two states away to meet what he thought was an underage girl, and did everything they could to keep it hush hush, even going so far as to get him a room afterwards. They didn't just know about it they actively enabled and rewarded the actions of someone they know to be a sexual predator against minors. They knew exactly what his intentions were when he got on that plane. They are at the very least, very much responsible for anything he does to harm any minors after that. They should have called the cops and reported what they know of lucas's intent and what he had just done in flying to LA, instead they quietly bailed him out
Zoomer Bae powiedział(a):
but I don’t think they should be on the hook for the care or actions of an adult who refuses treatment. Saying that someone could go after her legally if he did something is a huge stretch.
Its not a stretch at all. They know exactly what it is, there is documented evidence that they know what he is and what his intentions are. He is a pedo, they know he is a pedo, he has made explicit statements about being a pedo and has taken actions to target underage girls that they know about and they did and continue to do nothing and make no attempt to put a stop to it. If lucas ever harms some little girl her family will easily be able to go after lucas's mother at a minimum if they ever find out about it, in civil court. She had knowledge of an intended crime and failed to act to stop it or warn anyone about it, somebody was harmed as a result. Thats the kind of thing you get your ass reamed for in civil court. Such things have happened many times
Zoomer Bae powiedział(a):
t, but as it is, I don’t see much of a difference between their actions and parents who stop financing their adult drug addict children. At some point, no matter how shitty a parent you were, you can’t help someone who refuses to help himself.
I'm not talking about helping lucas, the time for that is long, long gone. If it was ever possible at all. I'm talking about getting him locked up so he can't harm others, as he has stated and demonstrated repeatedly his intent to do. That is absolutely within their power to do. Stopping handing out money to a drug addict is not the same thing. Said drug addict hasn't made his intent to target underage girls for predatory sexual purposes clear and hasn't spent a decade or more doing everything in his power to pursue that goal with your knowledge
That said, i'll just reiterate about the fact there is something very sketchy about lucas's parents. Especially his mother. Normal people do not go out of their way to bail a pedo out of a bad situation they put themselves in by trying to meet an underage girl. Child of theirs or otherwise. They don't get creepy and make a point of keeping tabs on said pedo like that either with the intent of bailing them out whenever they do something that crosses the line. It makes me seriously wonder if lucas isn't the only pedo in the family and if they're not protecting lucas to cover something else going on in the family. I'm even more suspicious given that they still put lucas's niece out there and take pics of her and whatnot playing his games for him despite his very obvious pedo comments about her, not to mention his brother being a school teacher. Putting all that together starts to raise some red flags. Perhaps they think lucas might say something that would get them into some trouble or that by pointing any fingers at him for his behavior it might lead to a cursory look into the rest of the family that might turn up something they don't want getting out. Also might explain why they bail him out when he does things that risk him getting into serious trouble, they know lucas is out for himself and might say shit about them to get himself off the hook if he ever got busted for something. There has to be a reason for bailing him out like that and it isn't 'hes my son' because if that were the case they'd be doing more than that and wouldn't be enabling such things