Lolcow LLC v. Liz Fong-Jones (1:26-cv-02059, S.D.N.Y.)

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Sure, but dont hold your breath fornher getting told to cough up money. The usual sanction is just striking her filing from the record, and maybe attorneys fees for the sanction motion to hardin, which would be paid by Kusk

That said, her claims of illegal behavior by the forum dance precariously close to making legal conclusions, which is a serious no no for a paralegal.

aren't attorney fee sanctions usually paid by the party and not the lawyer? I thought there was a very specif type of sanction that was payable by only the lawyer? So, I think, if fee's somehow get awarded KUSK can just shift the cost to Elliot.

 

[pursuitsnail]

She swore under oath a thread that Jewish and Israeli members of the forum use to bitch about the stupid Anti Semites is "Le Bad"

It would be weirdly in character for a New Yorker to mistake the term 'jewsperg' for Jews sperging about religion (pilpul) rather than meaning someone who spergs about Jews.

Basically KUCK law has argued in their counterclaim that Mr Wolman is the agent for service of process for the does. Mr. Wolman says "Um, no, I'm just here on their behalf to quash the subpoenas, if you want to sue them then you have to serve them."

Oh come on, did they not already make this mistake by trying to claim Hardin was an agent of service for Lolcow?

 

[DavidS877]

The court notifies KUCK Law, once again, that they are deficient. Well their pleading is at least.

 

[Autistic Joe]

The court notifies KUCK Law, once again, that they are deficient. Well their pleading is at least.
Wyświetl załącznik 9188354

Maybe they should just have ChatGPT do their legal filings. It's apparently less likely to make a mistake than this paralegal is.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

It is hard to overstate the difference between how this case is being handled, and the Utah garbage.
Motion to Extension of Time was filed on the 23rd, granted on the 25th in the early morning hours.
The Utah Court system really needs a reckoning if other courts can work this efficiently.

Quick and streamlined handling, no 5 months pending motions leaving all parties in limbo.

 

[Billy Beeple]

It is hard to overstate the difference between how this case is being handled, and the Utah garbage.
Motion to Extension of Time was filed on the 23rd, granted on the 25th in the early morning hours.
The Utah Court system really needs a reckoning if other courts can work this efficiently.

To be fair to the bow-tied homosexuals who are slow-rolling that case, part of the difference seems to be that there's no pro se bullshit going on here.

It's like when talking on the radio as a pilot. Non-pilots think ATC talks fast, but they can do so because both sides of the conversation know what information is being presented and in what order, so they can pick out the relevant bits quickly and there are very few extraneous words. When a student pilot stutters "um" on the radio and fumbles through a call, omitting important details, adding irrelevant ones, and mixing up the usual sequence, it slows everything down.

Also, I think judges slow-rolling things is an intentional strategy that we've seen in Stebbins' litigation as well. If the judge knows that granting or denying one motion is just going to beget three more motions, they're incentivized to slow things down and hope the pro se litigant will die, have a stroke, get bored and go away, or otherwise stop filing stupid bullshit.