Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
💼 CareercowJonathan "Full" McIntosh / RadicalBytes - "Pop Culture Detective", Cucked hard by Anita Sarkeesian, King Snowflake
Everyday, it's the same old thing from Jon. He takes something popular and tries to make you guilty for liking it by saying it's a "sexist" caricature or it takes something not seriously enough. This man has the kind of autism that rarely comes to pass.
@Y2K Baby ninja'd me, but yeah, it came up in the news because of that.
Also, someone on Twitter asked if there was a chance they could sneak in the lead character dying repeatedly in a variety of stupid ways, and Ryan Reynolds replied, "You mean the exact reason I signed on?" Which I liked.
But something straight men like might be produced! Full McIntosh must step in to attack!
Well Jonathan since you don't elaborate on your stance so I'm having to guestimate what you consider sexist and their's an implicit statement that targets a specific democgraphic without any elaboration on why thats bad so....yeah, you can be disregarded out of hand.
Good news, FemFreq is on the good side now! Remember Shia LeBouf, aka Mr. He Will Not Divide Us? FemFreq just tweeted out that they're glad he's been booted. Finally realized what we did three years ago, nice job catching up!
Everyday, it's the same old thing from Jon. He takes something popular and tries to make you guilty for liking it by saying it's a "sexist" caricature or it takes something not seriously enough. This man has the kind of autism that rarely comes to pass.
Jonathan McIntosh is going #FullMcIntosh again. This time over Johnny Depp's victory like the male-hating male feminist beta cuck he is. Wyświetl załącznik 3345586
Jonathan McIntosh is going #FullMcIntosh again. This time over Johnny Depp's victory like the male-hating male feminist beta cuck he is. Wyświetl załącznik 3345586
McIntosh's views about this matter are bigoted and outdated. How the hell are you going to bitch about misogyny when society at large can't tell me what a woman is anymore? Being misogynistic towards women is like being racist towards hobbits. You can't be because those are mythical creatures you'd find in a JRR Tolkien novel.
Also the stupid soy filled cunt spelled misogyny wrong. Lol.
Jonathan McIntosh is going #FullMcIntosh again. This time over Johnny Depp's victory like the male-hating male feminist beta cuck he is. Wyświetl załącznik 3345586
Jonathan McIntosh is going #FullMcIntosh again. This time over Johnny Depp's victory like the male-hating male feminist beta cuck he is.
How did Johnny Depp won? GamerGate! The GamerGate Playbook!
These guys simply can't let go of the one thing that made them relevant almost a whole fucking decade ago, can they? It's so fucking tiring, same tribalist horseshit as the other side, guys I like are always right, my enemies are always wrong, reality isn't nuanced and we all live in a big fucking neverending Hollywood film with clear cut good guys and bad guys. These professional activists are seemingly incapable of maturing mentally and learning about nuance, tolerance and other elements of mature thinking!
Depp is too smart to do this, but with his recent Court win he could easily fuck over these retards who keep slandering him. Would be nice to see them freak the fuck out after realizing that their actions have consequences and that they should have the bare minimum in terms of ethics and decency in their reporting, but the only thing you can get by kicking dead horses that keep trying to rise from their graves is dirt on your shoes and some light on these fucking losers. They win even if you fuck them over as hard as you can, it's like dealing with parasites!
Jonathan McIntosh is going #FullMcIntosh again. This time over Johnny Depp's victory like the male-hating male feminist beta cuck he is. Wyświetl załącznik 3345586
The pathetic irony of his denunciation of "reactionary pro-Depp" comments is that his own position on the matter is entirely reactionary.
He's not taking Amber Heard's side because of any evidence which could support taking that position; he's doing it out of a Pavlovian need to "believe all women" irrespective of what any evidence happens to say. There's nothing progressive or genuinely feminist about thinking in this way; on the contrary, it's actually incredibly patronizing to women when you think about it, because it not only assumes that they must be a victim by default, but also generally assumes that they must be incapable of victimizing men.
It's easy to believe such absolute nonsense, as in the Rittenhouse case, if you absolutely ignored what actually happened in favor of a deranged fantasy.