Harry Potter Reboot (HBO Max original series) - You are a cashcow, Harry

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Everything about this show looks like the Temu version of the original movies. Their main mistake was to reboot this when the movies were still too fresh in people's minds, kinda why Garfield's Spider-man was not bad but many people didn't feel much for them because they still remembered the Raimi trilogy too close to their childhood.

I insist they should have made it animated. They could have even had their black Snape who actually looked more like the book character, just dark.
Let this be a lesson for a potential reboot of A Song of Ice and Fire in case it gets done after Martin dies or whatever. It gets done animated and the likeness may be split between the actors or the book - particularly I favour the books (especially with the characters that got "Summer Island-ed"). That way, you get Thenns not being ridiculous and a bunch of other positive changes.

But onto the actual point you made: Yes, it should have been animated. They could have brought to the table two extras: it will be a series, not movie (thus more content from the book) + it will have a chance for more faithfulness from the overall adaptation without cutting corners.
 
Let this be a lesson for a potential reboot of A Song of Ice and Fire in case it gets done after Martin dies or whatever. It gets done animated and the likeness may be split between the actors or the book - particularly I favour the books (especially with the characters that got "Summer Island-ed"). That way, you get Thenns not being ridiculous and a bunch of other positive changes.

But onto the actual point you made: Yes, it should have been animated. They could have brought to the table two extras: it will be a series, not movie (thus more content from the book) + it will have a chance for more faithfulness from the overall adaptation without cutting corners.
I think an animated reboot of ASOIAF has potential to be better received because of how the show ended. If they indeed promise to do exactly every single aspect of the books and don't add or change stupid thinks like Talisa or removing Stoneheart, they could start doing it tomorrow and people will be somehow happy. If they cast some of the actors to do the voices, it can be absolute success.

But both SM and HP were not bad productions despite the many errors or choices they took in adaptation. When TASM was announced, people felt that they were "rebooting" the Raimi films, when it was just a different take, so that's why some took it as if they were saying "we're making a better version of what you saw", despite that was not the intention.

Same for HP. The movies, all mistakes considered, were not bad and they had their own magic. And to make it even more insulting, they aren't even adapting as the book as promised and they're already making changes on how they're interpreting the story.

I guess HP needed to keep making money and because the Newt movies were such a failure, their only option was to remake the original story. They could have made something better like making the Marauders years, for example. It'd still be Hogwarts and it would be about another wizarding word, just with "new" characters people also care for, like the marauders, young Snape, Lucius, etc. Consider also that most of the staff was the same, so we still would have Dumbledore, McGonagall, Sprout, Flitwick and Hagrid. They just don't trust any more being able to do anything new out of fear of another movie failure.
 
I think an animated reboot of ASOIAF has potential to be better received because of how the show ended. If they indeed promise to do exactly every single aspect of the books and don't add or change stupid thinks like Talisa or removing Stoneheart, they could start doing it tomorrow and people will be somehow happy. If they cast some of the actors to do the voices, it can be absolute success.

But both SM and HP were not bad productions despite the many errors or choices they took in adaptation. When TASM was announced, people felt that they were "rebooting" the Raimi films, when it was just a different take, so that's why some took it as if they were saying "we're making a better version of what you saw", despite that was not the intention.

Same for HP. The movies, all mistakes considered, were not bad and they had their own magic. And to make it even more insulting, they aren't even adapting as the book as promised and they're already making changes on how they're interpreting the story.

I guess HP needed to keep making money and because the Newt movies were such a failure, their only option was to remake the original story. They could have made something better like making the Marauders years, for example. It'd still be Hogwarts and it would be about another wizarding word, just with "new" characters people also care for, like the marauders, young Snape, Lucius, etc. Consider also that most of the staff was the same, so we still would have Dumbledore, McGonagall, Sprout, Flitwick and Hagrid. They just don't trust any more being able to do anything new out of fear of another movie failure.
Good point, regarding the "reimagination", with the Spider-Man point. The comics tend to do that, so I guess it gets a pass.

As for Harry Potter, the Marauders would tap into an untouched potential. That and the story of Jacob & his sibling, of the silly game "Hogwarts Mystery", set in 1980s to bridge between 1990s. It could even have some favourites while they were studying, like Bill and Charlie Weasley.
 
Thinking about this more are there any fat Hufflepuffs?
Either Crabbe or Goyle was fat and they were Slytherin, Longbottom was Gryffindor
Hufflepuff just sounds like they should be fat stupid hobbits
There’s the fat lady that young Tom Riddle after graduating kills steals her cool relics and frames her murder on her house elf.

She’s a descendant of Helga Hufflepuff.
 
And isn't the house ghost of Hufflepuff called "the fat monk"? Or would that not count? Most hufflepuffs sound more like the average normie (well besides Cedric Diggory I guess) who just stays in their lane. I mean unlike Gryyfindors or Slytherins I never read about Hufflepuffs doing some "rulebreaking"
 
Lockhart should be an Indian. I can't think of a group that thinks so high of themselves as much as they do, which makes an Indian actor a perfect Lockhart
I say fuck it, if you're going to do a clown show, go balls to the fucking wall.
Sanjeev Bhaskar is my unironic pick. He's already an established British-Indian actor.
My suggestion is the indian guy from Heroes who's name I still can't pronounce after 20 years.

This guy:
sendhil-ramamurthy-v0-1ppkwty8htzd1.png
Put a blonde wig on him, the "Liberace as a wizard" wardrobe, all of it. If you can crank it up, do it.
The only thing that doesn't fit for Gildasaar LockJeet is the scene of all the Witches going starry eyes over how dreamy he is.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=0L8fs156Y4E
That's because you're only using the rational part of your brain. Put enough prosthetic makeup that his chin rivals Bruce Campbell's and make it so the girls getting wet looking at him are victims of a geass or charm, they're doing it against their will.
 
Hagrid having a bit of a temper side to him is the first interesting thing about this show. He's supposed to be half-giant and in the words of Ron, giants are "well, not nice". Giving him something of a simple-minded dog like loyalty to Dumbledore, a bit of a reflexive temper - honestly, that's more interesting to me than Coltrane's gentle giant. And it's not at odds with the books, either.

But then what sympathy Frost gains from me he throws away with the obligatory "I disagree with JK" comment. Just to remind us all that even when an actor's whole schtick is playing down to Earth ordinary bloke types, they're usually not.

Cast Lawrence Fox in something. I'll go to see it just on principle. (He, incidentally, would make a good Snape).
 
Hagrid was a giant retarded guy, and he was always nice to Harry due to worshiping his parents and Dumbledore, but he was shown being colder to others and having poor impulse control. Him having a retard moment and randomly flooring someone in a bar wouldn't strike me as being at all out of character for him. I couldn't see him chimping out on the students or anything that extreme, but I don't think the books really portrayed him as being all that gentle of a person.
 
Hagrid was a giant retarded guy, and he was always nice to Harry due to worshiping his parents and Dumbledore, but he was shown being colder to others and having poor impulse control. Him having a retard moment and randomly flooring someone in a bar wouldn't strike me as being at all out of character for him. I couldn't see him chimping out on the students or anything that extreme, but I don't think the books really portrayed him as being all that gentle of a person.
"had some vague ambitions towards gentleness, or at least getting fewer killed"
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole