Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
The "there were plans without him" cope makes no sense. they could have simply subbed him out or started the game without him and only subbed him in when it was absolutely necessary.
Nah if he didn't walk as a starter onto that field there would've been an issue. USMNT had their hands tied on this and to argue anything else is cope. Had they not started him you would've had amerimutts saying "USMNT is WOKE and hates Trump! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott!"
The goalie going for the ball when the defenders are no where close and the attacker is right there was the correct call. He fumbled the clearing strike and then passed it back and to the side were the attacker was. He made two awful mistakes in like 3 seconds.
As a keeper at a very recreational level (lets go beer leagues) I am a huge advocate for stepping out of the box and getting on top of the ball. The science is in your favor for most balls: If it's coming towards you the odds of you getting to the ball before the striker are in your favor. They're chasing and the ball is coming to you. His issue was deciding to play with the ball instead of clearing it in what was clearly a hot box. Had he just gone for a full clear and hit the ball, even if he had butchered the kick, he would've removed the ball from a dangerous spot and had time to reset. His issue wasn't the aggression, but rather the hesitation that followed. It led to a mistake that would not have happened otherwise, and you can see how it cost a goal. The defender who stepped in front of the goal also butchered the play. Defense is typically supposed to, at that point, put their hands behind their back and keep themselves square and big (or just beam that ball with a fist and eat the red card like a national hero. at that point it's the goalies problem in a penalty kick). Him having his feet off the ground as the ball is kicked guarantees he isn't going to defend that ball.
True football heritage here. Their fans wants to win at any costs, even the slightest way to incur and make them irritated is true. It is a fan way to support their team. Just like chanting EEEEEEEEEHHHH PUTO is part of mexican sports culture.
Now the American government rigging the Iran ENTIRE actual talent is something much worse because it isn't done by fans doing this to help their team win even by a little it is done by the actual hosts in a malicious way.
>Mexico
>True football heritage
LMAO retard, those beaners have never gotten to quarter finals, unlike the US.
Those retards were chanting "Ole" in the first three minutes on a 0-0 score, when the defense was going back and forth.
They got good boxers but that's about it.
>Mexico
>True football heritage
LMAO retard, those beaners have never gotten to quarter finals, unlike the US.
Those retards were chanting "Ole" in the first three minutes on a 0-0 score, when the defense was going back and forth.
They got good boxers but that's about it.
If any of my fellow Americans are actually upset about the niggerball game, let me remind you that European leaders cope and seethe so hard about Our President that they had to get together for a group therapy session.
Which begs the question why the the goalie was in front outside the box while the fullback was in the box in front of the goal in the first place. That sort of play would get you bitched out by the coach if you were playing in a girls under 10 recreation league.
Nah soccer is more fluid than that. Keepers are expected to step forward to receive a ball, and if the full back has a brain they will run past the play to cover the goal. It's simple science:
Ball is coming in, keeper rushes to it, he is going to clash with the striker, this gives the full back, who is now in full motion towards the goal the opportunity to continue at full speed to get into position to cover the goal. His issue was not knowing what to do when he got there.
>Mexico
>True football heritage
LMAO retard, those beaners have never gotten to quarter finals, unlike the US.
Those retards were chanting "Ole" in the first three minutes on a 0-0 score, when the defense was going back and forth.
They got good boxers but that's about it.
Messing up with their sleep is football heritage, not mexico themselves.
Just like Oleing for South americans is when you are so much better than your rival and is humiliating them, the Ole from Mexico is different.
It is their football culture, nothing to be done here, at least they do have their own instead of watching ads being feed in their veins as they enjoy the slop they call food like americans do.
True football heritage here. Their fans wants to win at any costs, even the slightest way to incur and make them irritated is true. It is a fan way to support their team. Just like chanting EEEEEEEEEHHHH PUTO is part of mexican sports culture.
Now the American government rigging the Iran ENTIRE actual talent is something much worse because it isn't done by fans doing this to help their team win even by a little it is done by the actual hosts in a malicious way.
Nah if he didn't walk as a starter onto that field there would've been an issue. USMNT had their hands tied on this and to argue anything else is cope. Had they not started him you would've had amerimutts saying "USMNT is WOKE and hates Trump! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott!"
If any of my fellow Americans are actually upset about the niggerball game, let me remind you that European leaders cope and seethe so hard about Our President that they had to get together for a group therapy session.
Nah soccer is more fluid than that. Keepers are expected to step forward to receive a ball, and if the full back has a brain they will run past the play to cover the goal. It's simple science:
Ball is coming in, keeper rushes to it, he is going to clash with the striker, this gives the full back, who is now in full motion towards the goal the opportunity to continue at full speed to get into position to cover the goal. His issue was not knowing what to do when he got there.
Yes. Quite literally looked like the keeper, who got to the ball as he was supposed to, clipped the ground and bobbled (very bad mistake), which led to the Belgian (who was aware and good) to leap at the opportunity of a live ball and set his teammate up for success. The fullback (who did a fantastic job covering space while the keeper took it) then appeared surprised the keeper messed up and tried to put himself between the goal and the ball, but he just sorta impotently jumped instead of getting in front of the ball.
The TLDR is that like in every sport when your offense can't maintain ball control or score points, eventually the defense makes mistakes and crumbles. The score speaks for itself but make no mistake, the only shots they took in the second half were in the last 10 minutes. They went about 30-40 minutes where they just couldn't get anywhere within scoring distance. Their answer to that was neither to drive or keep repositioning for openings, but rather punt the ball and hope for the best. They really just didn't know what to do to penetrate the defense.
The US has invested trillions to develop AIs to answer these superficial, factual questions with ease, yet that isn't enough to educate your nigger brain. We reached quarter finals in 1970 and 1986.
One of the beauties of soccer is that the keeper does have the privilege and ability to step out of the box and participate on the field. It allows for all in strategies where the keeper plays up and helps apply pressure, or allows for one last all in play when the defensive line fails. Aggressive keeping IMO is far more interesting and the more efficient way to play. in my own experience strikers have no clue what to do when you're charging them. it throws them off and puts the pressure back on them to make a move rather than for you to manage the block. The point of the keeper is to make it as difficult for the opponent to score before they even take a shot.
The US has invested trillions to develop AIs to answer these superficial, factual questions with ease, yet that isn't enough to educate your nigger brain. We reached quarter finals in 1970 and 1986.
True football heritage here. Their fans wants to win at any costs, even the slightest way to incur and make them irritated is true. It is a fan way to support their team. Just like chanting EEEEEEEEEHHHH PUTO is part of mexican sports culture.
Now the American government rigging the Iran ENTIRE actual talent is something much worse because it isn't done by fans doing this to help their team win even by a little it is done by the actual hosts in a malicious way.
>Mexico
>True football heritage
LMAO retard, those beaners have never gotten to quarter finals, unlike the US.
Those retards were chanting "Ole" in the first three minutes on a 0-0 score, when the defense was going back and forth.
They got good boxers but that's about it.
I am grateful for Mexico fans. Not just because I find them amusing (which I do), but because they are strategically convenient. No matter how bad it gets in the UK with all the PSAs you see about domestic violence going up when England loses, at least England cares enough to report it as a crime. Wifebeating is just the norm in Mexico.
Comparing shit-talking to credible performance, Mexico is the worst. They are the loudest, but they don't have anything to back it up. They have never won a world cup or even gotten close to doing so. As much as I love their enthusiasm for the sport, they just don't have the record to back up such an ego.
