Feral Historian

For anyone curious where this quote was said in the video:
"That, I think, is the real danger we're facing. The West won't go quietly: there's a point where a rageful awakening of such brutality will happen that, whether it's too late or reverses the course (who can say) only that it would be better for everyone that it not get to that point".

It comes up around the 34:00 mark, right before the "Your Virtual Right-Wing Uncle" segment which can be as quoted as follows
First, no country has to let anyone in. It would be perfectly within their soverign rights for any nation, whether it be France or China or Eritrea, to say: "Piss off. If you weren't born here you can't live here." Just as it's reasonable to be selective about who is let in. Diversity is not our strength. Our strength is in coming together around things we have in common. Western cultures have gotten rather good at finding those things, of integrating immigrants into the wider cultural and value system.

But with some people there just isn't enough to build on. Charity comes with a cost and it has to be balanced.

Of course, you can argue that there's a moral duty to help, to provide an opportunity for a better life. But if you take that tact, none of the arguments for large-scale immigration from the third world, you know, fleeing from war, religious persecution, economic opportunity, lack of infrastructure, healthcare, education in their home countries, all of these could be addressed more effectively, more extensively and more long-lasting, with fewer downsides in the home countries with some form of recolonization.

Make the places they're running from like the places that they're running to: save them the trip. Yet, the activists go into a tizzy if you say so. I don't think it would be a good idea, it wouldn't be worth the blood and treasure, and I want no part of it. But it would do everything that the "migrants are welcome" crowd claims to stand for and do it better, revealing some insincerity, or at least severe nativity in their stated reasons.
 
Camp of Saints is a great book. I've recommended it to some chuddy buds at work. It accurately predicted what would happen to Europe. It's a gemmy.
My coal opinion is that Europe died in ww2 and the migrants only noticed the smell of the rotting corpse in the past 15 years and swarmed Europe in a feeding frenzy.
 
My coal opinion is that Europe died in ww2 and the migrants only noticed the smell of the rotting corpse in the past 15 years and swarmed Europe in a feeding frenzy.

That is very coal indeed. The actual truth is more complicated. The fall of the USSR made them overconfident and they bought into the whole "end of history" shit, while the communists never actually went away they just no longer had to deal with the USSR hogging the spotlight and making them look bad and have to disavow them. The trotskyists, fabians and eurocommies all rose from the ashes to try again and "do it right this time".
 
That is very coal indeed. The actual truth is more complicated. The fall of the USSR made them overconfident and they bought into the whole "end of history" shit, while the communists never actually went away they just no longer had to deal with the USSR hogging the spotlight and making them look bad and have to disavow them. The trotskyists, fabians and eurocommies all rose from the ashes to try again and "do it right this time".
The vilification of nationalism, a desire for cheap foreign labor and hatred or "guilt" over European history intersected to create a form of demographic torture.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole