I did, but not as a Fallout game. It is a mediocre FPS and half of that time I spend testing out mods(both my own and those others made), but it still has it's merits. The fact that I can have a nuanced opinion on a game I actually played for so long shows I know what I am talking about and can appreciate the opinion of others whom I also know played the game, vs some retarded porn addicts that likely never saw a triple digit of playtime in any of their playthrus and have godawful takes on regular bases. This is why I love watching those analysis videos, just when I thought I reached the bottom of the barrel of B*thesda's incompetence as RPG designers, coders and writers, there is some nitpick or problem I have somehow overlooked and I enter the rabbit hole once again. This is why I absolutely love to hate Starfield, it is the perfect representation of every single b*thesda game flaw that accumulated over the last 20 years all in one package, and worse than ever before, I am genuinely giddy for how awful TES6 is going to be.
Edit as to not double post: the more comparison footage I look at of Gamebryo Fallout/Skyrim/Starfield, the more I appreciate Outer Worlds for how smooth it's combat is, that even goes for something mediocre like Avowed that also has pretty decent combat. It's nothing groundbreaking, but it works and engages user moment to moment, meanwhile at it's best, Fallout 4/Starfield are a really shitty, janky FPS and even something like New Vegas is only remotely fun because it's balanced to hell and back thanks to Sawyer, otherwise it would be another stiff piece of shit like Fallout 3/Oblivion were. Thank god Outer Worlds 2 doubled down on that and made the combat even more hectic while still keeping RPG elements(more so than Starfield/Fallout 4 have, at any rate).
