Euphoric Christian Fatigue Thread

Who is (was) more annoying - Euphoric Atheists or Euphoric Christians?


  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    160
mean, that's if they admit that those countries are backwards. But the thing is, what if the Europeans that colonized them were not Christian? You think they would hate European Empires less for the fact if they were Atheist? They don't hate Christianity in Haiti because it's Christian, they hate it because it's a symbol of European Colonialism.
If they were Atheist, they would be hating on Haiti for being Atheist
They don't. This is why they coneniently leave out the USSR, but may criticize Imperial or Modern Russia's imperialism. Liberals never, ever criticize atheists only for being atheist (An example of this is how in when the Peacemaker second season released they created the bullshit fanfiction about Nazis being Christian and it got out of hand to the point even "conservatives" actually repeated this historical lie)
I never denied this, I am saying that vast majority of Christian Zoomers are democrat and Progressive in American contexts, meaning the whole thing about Atheist Zoomers being Democrat and Progressive doesn't matter.
Lmao do you even have a source for this or it's just anecdote? Because Christian zoomers being more progressive than older zoomers doesn't mean that the "based atheists" are a significant portion politically.
I am not saying this right now, my main point was that Zoomer Christian are not right-wing and that there is no huge political intersectionality between Christianity and Conservatism anymore do to more Zoomers becoming Atheist and continuing to become Atheist. Christian Zoomers still being shitlibs despite being Christian Zoomers.
Zoomers on the left and right will continue leaving Christianity meanwhile keeping their politics.
Again, there is literally no source about zoomer Christians being as progressive as zoomer Atheists, you just repeat the same anecdote about how a group of anti leftist atheists is rising.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole