1. Demonetization Based on Content (Question 1a & 1b)
Example: Independent News Channels (e.g., Secular Talk, The Jimmy Dore Show)
YouTube has repeatedly demonetized or restricted ad revenue for independent news creators who cover controversial political topics, even when content does not violate official guidelines.
These creators often receive vague notices citing “not advertiser-friendly” content, without a specific policy violation listed.
Many argue this disproportionately affects independent voices compared to mainstream outlets discussing the same issues.
2. Shadow Banning & Suppression of Reach (Question 1a & 1b)
Example: “Vaccine Misinformation” Labels and Algorithm Demotion (2020–2023)
YouTube acknowledged it suppressed content that conflicted with WHO or CDC guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Several creators (e.g., Bret Weinstein, Dr. John Campbell) alleged their videos were buried in search results or not recommended, despite scientific citations.
View counts and audience reach dropped without clear notice—fitting the definition of “shadow banning.”
3. Deplatforming Due to Off-Platform Conduct (Question 1c)
Example: Banning of Alex Jones / InfoWars
YouTube removed Alex Jones and all InfoWars-related content in 2018, citing repeated policy violations.
However, some critics argue that the move was driven by pressure related to his off-platform actions (e.g., lawsuits regarding Sandy Hook claims).
The enforcement came after media and public pressure rather than a consistent application of policy across users.
4. Inconsistent Policy Enforcement (Question 2d & 3c)
Example: Commentary and Debate Channels (e.g., Steven Crowder vs. others)
YouTube suspended Steven Crowder’s channel multiple times citing hate speech.
Critics noted that other users engaged in similar commentary without consequences, suggesting inconsistent policy enforcement based on ideology or external pressure.
Appeals were often slow or ineffective, leaving creators in limbo without recourse.
5. Lack of Transparency and Due Process (Question 3a–c)
Example: Sudden Channel Terminations Without Warning
Numerous YouTubers have reported waking up to their channels being deleted or demonetized with no prior strikes or specific warnings (e.g., channels dealing with cryptocurrency, firearms education, or sensitive political issues).
Appeals processes are often automated or non-responsive, giving users little clarity or chance to contest the actions.
6. Policy Shifts After Market Dominance (Question 6d)
Example: YouTube's Evolution Post-Google Acquisition
YouTube built its audience on open expression and permissive content, especially during its early years (2005–2012).
After becoming dominant, YouTube changed its moderation and monetization policies significantly, making it harder for small or controversial creators to thrive.
something good will come out of it
