💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Honestly Watergate just pisses me the fuck off.
The fact is that Watergate or not, Nixon would have won, even the most die hard democrats agree that he was going to win, so when you ask why? Why would Nixon do something like that, why risk it all? The answer they give is that he had a chip in his shoulder, to which I say this ain't a chip that's whole ass log! No one is this vain.
 
Despite getting reamed and humiliated last time, Dev wants another debate:
1782769491781.png
Remember: the only reason why Dev got mad in his debate with Ryan was because Ryan was a "dishonest, slimy car salesman of a liar," to paraphrase Dev. So naturally, when encountered with such a bad-faith actor, Dev wants to debate him again. It has nothing to do with him wanting to salvage what's left of his reputation by point-scoring on Ryan.
And most corrupt in our lifetime? The fuck does that mean Dev? Whos life time?
Dev's position of Trump being the most corrupt president really strikes me as a case of "man finally pays attention to politics, is shocked to find corruption." Especially when people can levy the Hunter Biden Burisma thing as a scandal and Dev repeatedly handwaving it away for reasons.
 
Dev's position of Trump being the most corrupt president really strikes me as a case of "man finally pays attention to politics, is shocked to find corruption." Especially when people can levy the Hunter Biden Burisma thing as a scandal and Dev repeatedly handwaving it away for reasons.

That is actually a great way to describe it. So many of the issues people apparently have are so obviously just issues because these people heard it on TV and regurgitated by propaganda pieces. They rely on the consensus to tell them what is happening, and can't figure it out themselves. It's a scandal if TV man says so, but not a scandal if they don't say so.

Usually also the same sort of faggot who says things like "I wish politics would be boring again" where they admit they can let the TV just bully them into anything it wants by raising a racket.
 
It's a scandal if TV man says so, but not a scandal if they don't say so.
I'm honestly of the opinion that Trump isn't any more corrupt than past presidents, but he and his administration are under a constant magnifying glass by news institutions that do not like him and have every incentive to air his dirty laundry loudly and often. That was a pretty big reason why I voted for him back in 2016, since the coverage leading up to that election showed that the press was not willing to give him a single inch of leeway on anything while constantly glazing Hillary (who had the gall to complain after the fact that the news was the problem for her loss for covering him so much). An adversarial press that holds the presidency to task (even if it is a bunch of bullshit) is a lot better than the Obama-era ballwashers the press became in their efforts to gunt-guard "Their Guy."

I imagine that part of Dev's rationale for thinking Trump is so uniquely corrupt is because a lot of his research, when it's not coming from poorly-skimmed Wikipedia searches, comes from more left-leaning news sources like CNN and MSNBC that are unwilling to give Trump any kind of charity for anything, which informs the corruption perspective if it's not balanced out by primary sources or sources from places like Fox or OANN. It's also likely a factor as to why he failed to cover Obama's bigger scandals like Fast and Furious since the CNN crowd barely gave that air, but happily talked about the "tan suit" scandal since they could use it to paint their political opposition as histrionic faggots kvetching over pointless bullshit.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
"man finally pays attention to politics, is shocked to find corruption."
Other than TYT are there even any prominent leftoids that followed US politics before 2016. Even destiny didn't talk about politics until 2016, every breadtuber started by leeching off of and backstabbing the degenerate (I guess Sam Seeder started in 2010, but he partnered with TYT and secular talk started in 2008, but who even knows them, to be fair the only reason you'd know Sam is if you remember Ethan Klein vs Steven Crowder).
 
You all are overlooking something important: by '"we've seen in a generation" they'll mean 20 years, so they'll only accept comparisons between Trump and Biden, Obama, and maybe George W. Bush.
You're being too charitable they'll probably give less, maybe 10 years and they'll argue Biden was just a retard that was taken advantage of (which isn't entirely untrue).
 
Dev will invoke the Eastman memo, making him the victor.

He still hasn't named a single lie Ryan told in their debate though, but he has clarified Ryan lied multiple times so educate yourself shitlord
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole