Dark Enlightenment and Neo Monarchism

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
OOA is false, negros are homo erectus
20k years is far too short for such enormous differences

Yoruba and Igbo Black Africans have 4% Homo Erectus, groups like Mbuti pygmies have around 16% which can reach as high as 19%

Horn/east Africans are 100% Homo Sapien.

OOA theory is vindicated hardcore by evidence in archeogenetics. Innate group differences has been vindicated hardcore by archeogenetics. Thus evolutionary mechanics are true.

You are being retarded and not applying evolution properly, it's just serving your ideology. You do realize we can just contrast all modern populations with Neanderthals and Denisovans on a PCA calculator. You will see that Neanderthals, Sapiens and Denisovian all form separate clusters, they do not join at the fringes at all. All modern populations clusters together. Some black Africans and Australians are on the fringes of the sapien genetic cluster towards the other species.

20k years is not far too short for enormous differences. Selection pressures really took off once civilization started 10k years ago. We co-evolved as society got more complex over the millenia. And that evolution was driven by superiors having higher fertility rates than inferiors or just surviving better.
SelectionIsReal.large.webp

Source:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021v1.full.pdf

NW euros have serious group differences between their ancestors 2000 years ago. So does Ashkenazi Jews, Palestinian/Jordan Christians and Sarmatians are mostly Iron age Israelites, so a sibling to biblical jews and they had the exact same selection pressures (no differences). Ashkenazi Jews are also superior to their Roman ancestors as well.

No such thing as magic blood dude. Our bronze age western steppe ancestors were generally swarthy, but had a broad northern european morphology to them. The Aryans were iron age WSH who stayed in South + central asia (not our ancestors, just relatives), and yes they were very fair and nordic. Once PIE made contact with globular amphora culture (who were the fairest european farmers), they got an obsession with fair traits.

yes i see, please touch grass
How else do you make future whites superior to past whites (a sign of true progress) without having either your genetic elites having high gene flow + higher fertility rate than inferiors? They need an outsized contribution to the gene pool for eugenics/ directional selection to happen.

IVFcuck can mean we set up elite sperm/egg banks and men can fertilize an elite gifted woman's egg to make an embryo for his wife to incubate. Wife can do the same with an elite male sperm donor. Both pass on their genes. Both of their children are most likely superior to them and our bell curve shifts to the right finally.

Or you can wait for embryo selection, but not everyone will do that.

on the contrary, transhumanism will end in entrenched and highly stratified castes

We already have a hidden fucking caste system. Whites from multi-generational professional families (think doctors, dentists, certain trades, scientists, engineers, etc) are genetically superior to the working class. They have a higher education attainment, they have a different genotype making them genetically distinct (they still genetically cluster with us, that is just described by ancient ancestral composition)

150 IQ genius from working class may be equal to a 150 IQ genius from the upper middle class multi-generational family (upper class for several generations)... But their kids will not be equal even if they both reproduced with the exact same women. They have different means to regress to.

Jews, whites, east asians, etc all have hidden caste systems. The difference between ours and pajeets is that some elite families breed out, or had a crappy means and leaves. New elite families form and take their place. For pajeetland, their elite families just pretend they are elite even if they regressed to a pathetic mean that's like 5 IQ points above the average. Their elite stock never refreshed itself.

And pajeets can detect any caste system. They know exactly which people to suck up to. They don't suck up to the everyday Ashkenazi or white, they suck up to those who hail from good family backgrounds, as those people run the show. Upper class focuses on networking and using their time wisely for a reason.

Look at the family backgrounds of directors of say the CIA. Or perhaps the family background of some great inventors/researchers. G fucking loaded. There's a huge difference between whites who descend from successful lines of Bishops (priest class) than working class. Huge difference in average intellectual accomplishments between Jews who descend from Rabbis and those who don't.

It's bullshit, but welcome to the sexual reproduction lotto system. Humans, Ideas and Machines run the world. For humans, if you don't pop out the vagina of the right lineages, you are powerless to change anything 99.9% of the time.

hating jews is the hobby of every good honest lower class man for about as long as jews are in europe
Antisemitism was an upper class thing at first. Working class was too illiterate, too uneducated to notice the wrongdoings of Jews. Like many things from genes to culture. The working class adopted it as it "trickled down" from the elites.

Hating Jews is stupid. Fearing them is smarter as the Ashkenazi and Sephardi somewhat are covertly dangerous people. We can compete with Sephardi in duels of wit but not Ashky. They got a SD over us in genius world, so their IQ ceiling is higher than ours. And we're like 7 SD away from the theoretical maximum for human intelligence naturally.
 
I hate Dark Enlightenment/NeoMonarchist spergs so fucking much. They're all just a bunch of MovieBobs. Whiny autistic nerds who got bullied in high school and masterbate to fantasies of their BASED CEO GODKING making all the chads and stacies into neo-serfs. Yarvin is a chinless retard, and in a just world would be given a Republican Baptism like the dysgenic little toad he is.
If your criticism of democracy as a cabal of elites is solved by setting up a new cabal of elites, your are a retard. The monarchies of old were just the GloboHomo of the old world, a bunch of inbred nobles with no nation ruling over nationless subjects.
 
I won’t say much because I barely understand this nonsense but I do feel it’s worth mentioning that the Vice President (and other US cabinet members) actually do take these ideas seriously. In other words people in and around high levels government within the United States believe in the Dark Enlightenment as a political philosophy.
 
It's a harebrained nerd revenge fantasy cooked up by terminally online weirdos, and invariably supported by gormless malcontents who aren't clever enough to know the difference between long-winded obscurantism and incisive analysis. In short, it's all grain and no detail, and there's no grains of truth in it either, because the idea that some sort of programmer-led techno-feudalism would be an improvement over liberal democracy is so at odds with the available evidence that it's barely worth debating.
 
You can't make worshipping CEOs and corporations cool by peddling this nonsense - you need a religion to back it up, like how feudalism mostly worked because of catholicism and the church.
 
Moldbug is a snob who deliberately makes his essays longer than they need to be to weed out those who...value their time, I guess?

He's just a right-wing version of the communist from that Stonetoss comic who is disgusted by the thought of shaking hands with a working man.

So good luck with your monarchist revolution you chinless faggot. Sorry I didn't have fourteen hours set aside to absorb your genius ideas, I had more exciting things to do like organizing my sock drawer.
No you're just a retard with low attention span due to tiktok frying your brain. Yarvin has one of the most easiest and accessible writing styles and I never felt bored reading him (even if some of the pop-culture references were a little bit too cringe). If you couldn't handle that then how could you read some older monarchists like Carlyle or Filmer who's writing style is much more harder to chew on?

I'm extremely dissapointed in the quality of this thread since there could be some interesting discussions to be had if someone had actually bothered to read him before jumping to conclusions. But it's just name-calling and brainfarts you hear from Bluesky from people who never read a book in their entire life but have very strong opinions about every subject. I'm genuinely baffled at how some people take pride in their ignorance and have the audacity to open their mouths before doing any research. For example I don't like communists but at least I try to read their theory to find flaws in it instead of going "lol didn't read but lenin is a faggot cuz he got bad vibes and he's a joo or something".
 
Reading on it online, it sounds retarded, like every monarchism based "we don't like how democracy results in an unelected cabal controlling us, so let's have an unelected cabal control us that we can't elect out".

Having individual city states with the idea people will move out is retarded because people are staying due to family and land.

It sounds more like an ideology to destroy the west.

I find it to be a bit utopian.

Monarchism worked because when the king was bad, he was done away with by his siblings or an angry peasant mob. If he wrecked the kingdom, his family fortunes would go bust.

As much as I like it, it would be hard to do today without the Based CEO King just taking his private jet and scooting out of the country the moment shit hits the fan. The same is true for Presidents as well. Just crypto the treasury and its all neatly wrapped up, time for an early retirement.

The best it can work is with pariah states like Best Korea, where the royal family is kind of fucked if they screw up too badly.
 
I find it to be a bit utopian.

Monarchism worked because when the king was bad, he was done away with by his siblings or an angry peasant mob. If he wrecked the kingdom, his family fortunes would go bust.
It's a bit romanticized, only other nobles and god tier merchants had any chance of outing a monarch, peasants didn't have any real hope of outing a monarch short of going on a suicide decapitation mission and hoping whoever comes next won't immediately kill the families of anyone involved in retaliation.

While the monarch's money was mainly tied in land, they could absolutely bankrupt the nation and then take anything they can carry and escape to their cousin in another country, which might as well be another planet in those times.
 
It's a bit romanticized, only other nobles and god tier merchants had any chance of outing a monarch, peasants didn't have any real hope of outing a monarch short of going on a suicide decapitation mission and hoping whoever comes next won't immediately kill the families of anyone involved in retaliation.

While the monarch's money was mainly tied in land, they could absolutely bankrupt the nation and then take anything they can carry and escape to their cousin in another country, which might as well be another planet in those times.

I never said it was perfect, but it was a hell of a lot more rewarding when they actually did their jobs and got all the giant statues for it, plus fleeing was rather inconvenient and generally bothersome. The problem of a bad king fleeing is miniscule compared to what a politician can do, get away with and happily retire after doing.
 
Curtis Yovan is an idiot who stole all of his ideas from people like Jean Bowden. Hell, even Gene Bowden admits that. Democracy has some good points.
The idea of the cathedral is literally just. Stolen from a person by the name of Robert Michelle, a socialist philosopher. Sociologist.

The idea of the Dark Elf nonsense is literally taken from six books of the Commonwealth when he says that UH Gene Bowden talks about how certain sovereigns were used for in mercenaries. Most of Nick Lan's ideas are just. Literally just stolen from people like Ivan Illyan.
None of these people are original thinkers. They're just regurgitating. Very obscure political text from the 16th, 17th and 19th century.

Here you want a better view of monarchy, 6 books of the Commonwealth. Resistance to evil with force. The sovereign majesty of absolute kings.
Political Parties by Robert Michel.
Leviathan. Suns also rise. Life in a medieval village. The star spangled crown.
Authoritarianism, 1000 questions asked and answered.
The collective works of Spingler.
For my Legionnaires.
The Prince Machiavelli.
The Machiavellian.
The rise of the managerial state.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole