💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Głosy: 232 35,4%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Głosy: 424 64,6%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    656
Look, I'll take white supremacy/nationalism seriously as a movement/ideology/whatever you want to call it the second it produces something substantive other than:

1. Spectacular infighting
This is a big one, wignat lurkers. A hypothetical White guy can want total nigger and jew death as much as you do, but if he reflects on how you lot classified the Irish, Italians, Poles, Spaniards, Slavs, etc. as non-Whites/lesser Whites, he's not going to join your budding ethnostate project.

That's because he knows it'll only be a matter of time before any one or more of them get their place next on the ethnic cleansing chopping block, once the White ethnostate inevitably fails to become a utopia. Also because he'll know it won't stop until it reaches a boiling point where it ends with a fraction of the original population remaining, or the nation gets weakened enough to get conquered by another.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
This is a big one, wignat lurkers. A hypothetical White guy can want total nigger and jew death as much as you do, but if he reflects on how you lot classified the Irish, Italians, Poles, Spaniards, Slavs, etc. as non-Whites/lesser Whites, he's not going to join your budding ethnostate project.
well the one thing lefties get right is that the standard for who's white keeps changing. I'm seeing some guys call Asians white (largely to cope for their fetishes). Some say Slavs aren't white. Its probably better to abandon the concept altogether instead of depreciating the value of being "white" to just being anyone we don't like. I mean seriously is it just looks ? behavior? lineage? Because you could find millions of examples of people considered white who miss the mark.
If being a wignat ultimately leads to coping for a tranny chasing nuisance streamer because "the nigs do it too" then its no surprise that no one who has any stake in society cares about it.
 
well the one thing lefties get right is that the standard for who's white keeps changing. I'm seeing some guys call Asians white (largely to cope for their fetishes). Some say Slavs aren't white. Its probably better to abandon the concept altogether instead of depreciating the value of being "white" to just being anyone we don't like. I mean seriously is it just looks ? behavior? lineage? Because you could find millions of examples of people considered white who miss the mark.
If being a wignat ultimately leads to coping for a tranny chasing nuisance streamer because "the nigs do it too" then its no surprise that no one who has any stake in society cares about it.
This just really isn’t true. I’m sorry tongue-in-cheek jokes about Japs being White because Anime Characters are White exist but it’s not sincere.

What race-mixers actually say is coal like “Mixed? Heavens no, we’re both Catholic.”
 
well the one thing lefties get right is that the standard for who's white keeps changing. I'm seeing some guys call Asians white (largely to cope for their fetishes). Some say Slavs aren't white. Its probably better to abandon the concept altogether instead of depreciating the value of being "white" to just being anyone we don't like. I mean seriously is it just looks ? behavior? lineage? Because you could find millions of examples of people considered white who miss the mark.
If being a wignat ultimately leads to coping for a tranny chasing nuisance streamer because "the nigs do it too" then its no surprise that no one who has any stake in society cares about it.
White just means European now. Like Bulgarians, Icelanders, Spaniards, Welshman and Russian are all White.
the conversation around the whole "Aryan" thing is more complicated, that's where Nordicism comes into play. Not all europeans have the same amount of "Aryan" or "Yamnaya steppe pastoralist" dna.
Southern Euros and balkanoids have less, from what I understand the Dutch, Irish, Icelanders and the Scots have among the highest as a percentile.
 
White just means European now. Like Bulgarians, Icelanders, Spaniards, Welshman and Russian are all White.
the conversation around the whole "Aryan" thing is more complicated, that's where Nordicism comes into play. Not all europeans have the same amount of "Aryan" or "Yamnaya steppe pastoralist" dna.
Southern Euros and balkanoids have less, from what I understand the Dutch, Irish, Icelanders and the Scots have among the highest as a percentile.
But this is what makes being a "white nationalist" comical. European have vast cultural and ethnic diversity, to argue that they can all unite under a single umbrella term "white" is no better than the melting pot stuff leftists try to parrot.
 
But this is what makes being a "white nationalist" comical. European have vast cultural and ethnic diversity, to argue that they can all unite under a single umbrella term "white" is no better than the melting pot stuff leftists try to parrot.
I still feel that unifying under the banner of historic Christian cultures is better than trying to play the game of “blood purity.” It still runs into the issue of denominational schisms, but a Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox will usually have more in common than any would have with a Hindu or Muslim.
 
But this is what makes being a "white nationalist" comical. European have vast cultural and ethnic diversity, to argue that they can all unite under a single umbrella term "white"
I still feel that unifying under the banner of historic Christian cultures is better than trying to play the game of “blood purity.” It still runs into the issue of denominational schisms, but a Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox will usually have more in common than any would have with a Hindu or Muslim.
Firstly: There never was a unified christianity though. Even ignoring schisms, back when european states could conceivably consider christianity their state religion, the fact their cultures differed in so many other aspects was frequently grounds to create out and in groups and fight wars over that. As well as power. It didn't at any point in time matter to a power hungry lord who shared a religion with him/his people if waging a war meant gaining land, ressources and influence. The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation was unified by Liege and Name only, while the infighting between "white christians" was notoriously bad, even in the context of the medieval era.
Secondly: "historic" is a nebulous word, because how far back you choose to go is entirely up to interpretation. Lithuania was a bastion of pagan faith in the medieval ages and when they finally did convert their ruler Jogaila didn't decree it to finally join the christian religious family, but to compound influence through an arranged marriage. Not to mention that a royal decree doesn't just evaporate a peoples long held traditions overnight. And then think of the berber occupation of iberia. Spain was majority or at least large part muslim for centuries, but they are certainly not in the discussion for being non-christian.
Thirdly: I confess when this topic is brought up, I feel very left out. I'm not a christian, by any means and where I come from christianity didn't play a major role in the public eye or culture for well over 90 years. So what's my place in all of this? If I have no place in this "christian unity" where do I go then?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole