Christopher Cantwell v. Edward J. Gorcenski (aka Emily Florence Gorcenski) & Kristopher Goad (2017) - Charlottesville white supremacist claiming ANTIFA framed him

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku JSGOTI
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

JSGOTI

Just Some Guy On The Internet
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Dołączono
5 Kwi 2015
Christopher Cantwell, one of the white supremacists who marched in Charlottesville as part of the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in August, is facing up to 20 years in prison for allegedly attacking protesters with mace. But now he's trying to turn the tables on his accusers, claiming they used mace on themselves as part of an antifa plot to “maliciously punish, discredit, vex, and harass him.”

The complaint was filed Thursday by Cantwell’s lawyer Elmer Woodward. Cantwell’s complaint names two people who testified in court against him — Emily Gorcenski and Kristopher Goad — claiming they were part of a “cluster” of antifa who attempted to spray him with mace.

The complaint describes Cantwell and his allies as “The Monumentals” who were simply protecting public property and exercising their First Amendment rights.

“Antifa was also enjoying rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Virginia,” the document states. “As is their pattern and practice, antifa attacked the Monumentals. Two antifa subsequently swore out false and fraudulent criminal warrants against plaintiff, a Monumental slated to speak at the Aug. 12 rally.”

The complaint acknowledges that Cantwell used pepper spray to defend himself, but argued that he did not hit Gorcenski and Goad, contrary to what they testified in court. Cantwell is seeking more than $107,000 in damages from each defendant, as well as punitive damages in the amount of $350,000 from each defendant.

The lawsuit is the latest turn in the legal aftermath of Charlottesville, where white supremacists and neo-Nazis marched ostensibly in support of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee on the campus of the University of Virginia. The march devolved into a violent clash that left one protester dead after an avowed neo-Nazi drove a speeding car into a crowd.

Cantwell was ultimately charged with one count of felony use of tear gas by a Charlottesville Grand Jury. He is currently out on bond but faces five to 20 years in prison if convicted.

His pretrial hearing is scheduled for Jan. 31 and his trial is slated for Feb. 12.

"I'm going to beat this case, sue everyone involved, and use the money to fund the alt-right," Cantwell said, in an interview. "Goad and Gorcenski lied, and their dishonesty will now advance my goals."

Both Gorcenski and Goad testified as government witnesses in earlier proceedings against Cantwell, alleging he sprayed them with mace during a torch-lit white supremacist march that took place the night before the Unite the Right rally.

In his lawsuit, Cantwell refers to Gorcenski, a transgender documentarian from Charlottesville, by male pronouns and her former male name, and describes her as a “media relations assistant to antifa.” When she was cross-examined during Cantwell’s trial, Gorenski said that she is not part of antifa and went to the University of Virginia’s campus on Aug. 11 to film the rally, not participate in the protest.

Cantwell describes Goad, a resident of Richmond, Virginia, as a “violent political activist, supporter, and adherent of antifa.” “Goad has a disco mustache, had longish hair and wore a blue jean jacket,” the complaint adds.

The complaint also refers to a few other unnamed individuals, including “Beanyman,” “a short white male with a beard,” and “Undersleeves,” someone who was wearing “an orange long-sleeved shirt under a short-sleeved blue t-shirt.”

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4341741-1-Main.html
 
I propose we adopt the term "monumental" to denote the most breathtakingly exceptional reetards.
 
In his lawsuit, Cantwell refers to Gorcenski, a transgender documentarian from Charlottesville, by male pronouns and her former male name, and describes her as a “media relations assistant to antifa.” When she was cross-examined during Cantwell’s trial, Gorenski said that she is not part of antifa and went to the University of Virginia’s campus on Aug. 11 to film the rally, not participate in the protest.

Cantwell describes Goad, a resident of Richmond, Virginia, as a “violent political activist, supporter, and adherent of antifa.” “Goad has a disco mustache, had longish hair and wore a blue jean jacket,” the complaint adds.

The complaint also refers to a few other unnamed individuals, including “Beanyman,” “a short white male with a beard,” and “Undersleeves,” someone who was wearing “an orange long-sleeved shirt under a short-sleeved blue t-shirt.”
I have absolutely no background in laws or cases and I have 0 idea how to mount a legal case or sue somebody.

I can still tell that this is probably not what you are supposed to do. @AnOminous you think it's gonna get thrown out?
 
Witnesses are generally immune from civil claims, even for perjury. See generally Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983).

This is totally a lolsuit.

EDIT: Elmer Woodard (attorney for Cantwell) may be a lolyer. He apparently tried to defend a pedo by claiming he was sleepwalking.

"It's been the subject of a House episode and a Law and Order episode, so we're going to explore whether it applies," he said.

Pretty sure that ain't gonna pass Daubert, but whatever, my dude.

http://wset.com/archive/danville-man-hopes-to-use-sexsomnia-defense-in-court
 
I have absolutely no background in laws or cases and I have 0 idea how to mount a legal case or sue somebody.

I can still tell that this is probably not what you are supposed to do. @AnOminous you think it's gonna get thrown out?

Witnesses are generally immune from civil claims, even for perjury. See generally Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983).

This is totally a lolsuit.

This.

It's also the case for police complaints (even utterly bogus ones deliberately made up for harassment purposes) and nearly any other statements made in litigation. These can be subject to criminal prosecution, but rarely are you directly civilly liable even for the most absolute bullshit committed in court, other than by the state itself.

The crying Nazi lolsuit is exactly the kind of thing this rule is intended to prevent.
 
This is the delightful gentleman who is taking Cuckwell's Big Boy, Totally Real And Not Frivolous Lawsuit(tm).

elm1.jpg

And he is operating out of this swanky law office.

elmer.png

Just like The Donald himself, Chris is gonna win so much he'll be sick of it now that Benjamin Franklin from the esteemed law offices of Picnic Table, Rusted-Out Car and Dilapidated Shed LLC are on the case!
 
Just like The Donald himself, Chris is gonna win so much he'll be sick of it now that Benjamin Franklin from the esteemed law offices of Picnic Table, Rusted-Out Car and Dilapidated Shed LLC are on the case!

Looks like it's an old gas station, with the place the pumps used to be filled in with concrete. I assume the lolyer is some kind of nutcase.
 
This is the delightful gentleman who is taking Cuckwell's Big Boy, Totally Real And Not Frivolous Lawsuit(tm).

Wyświetl załącznik 349989

And he is operating out of this swanky law office.

Wyświetl załącznik 349988

Just like The Donald himself, Chris is gonna win so much he'll be sick of it now that Benjamin Franklin from the esteemed law offices of Picnic Table, Rusted-Out Car and Dilapidated Shed LLC are on the case!
Looks like it's an old gas station, with the place the pumps used to be filled in with concrete. I assume the lolyer is some kind of nutcase.
To me, it looks like one of those dilapidated Detroit houses.
 
"I'm going to beat this case, sue everyone involved, and use the money to fund the alt-right," Cantwell said

This is honestly my favorite part. One of the basic tenants of suing someone is they need to ya know, actually have the money if you want to see it. The state doesn't go "oh, looks like you sued some jobless college idiots, we'll cover the bill". If he won, which he won't, he wouldn't see a fucking dime of it anyway.
 
Chris Can't Well Stay Away From Methamphetamines is at it once again. Losing a legal battle with a fucking tranny is gonna do great things for the white race, I'm sure.
 
Shit, if that tranny's right they weren't even antifa, they were just there to record everything.

Which, yknow, it's a political rally, I don't blame them for a second.

As much as we love to poke fun at troons I'm pretty sure most of us can agree someone doesn't deserve to get maced just for being trans at a high-tension rally.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole