- Dołączono
- 8 Cze 2015
I don't think you can, in good faith, make an argument that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on crime, either. Deterrence only works on minor stuff anyway and providing an incentive for the law-abiding to stay that way because they have too much to lose. You don't cheat on your taxes because you could lose life savings AND go to jail. You don't steal a newspaper because you get a reputation as a shoplifter means nobody will serve you AND you end up with with fines and having to do community service.
Deterrence works in those situations.
But the death penalty, in it's current form? You pretty much have to kill someone to get it, and if you're plotting to kill someone, you've crossed the line of being able to rationally weigh pros and cons. Besides 400 some odd things were punishable by death in Merry old England, from stealing an egg to beheading the King, and somehow, that didn't stop either of those things from happening.....
Deterrence works in those situations.
But the death penalty, in it's current form? You pretty much have to kill someone to get it, and if you're plotting to kill someone, you've crossed the line of being able to rationally weigh pros and cons. Besides 400 some odd things were punishable by death in Merry old England, from stealing an egg to beheading the King, and somehow, that didn't stop either of those things from happening.....