Cross post from his thread:
Thanks fren! This is what I was looking for! Will go over it all this weekend and rework the OP. This thread is alive. Its Aliiiiiiiiive
For now, here is Virtual Dining Concepts Counter Claim and Jimmies answer are at the bottom.
The TL;DR is Virtual Dining are suing Beast for Breach of Contract, Breach of Letter Agreement, Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Everyone's favorite tort, THE TURTLE OF INTERFERENCE, and they want a Permanent injunction against Jimmy to make him shut up about them, as well as declaratory judgement for the rest.
It looks like the entire Federal Case was reincorporated into the State case in New York County. They've been fighting over procedure for the last year from my glance over the docket and as
@kurosawa pointed out, got absolutely sandbagged. There was some efforts to try and seal the case to prevent anyone from looking into confidential corporate documents, and got denied because Beasts lawyer fucked up. Which is why we now have the entire corporate flow chart of Jimmies company, Docket 147.
After that fighting over Discovery and who gets what, which Beast lost. Virtual Dining gets what it wants for Discovery. Jimmy tried to bring the Anti-SLAAP provision to bar discovery but got batted down since the Judge determined this was primarily a fight over Contracts, not speech. She did opine it was possible to apply to the TURTLE OF INTERFERENCE claim however.
It hasn't gone entirely against Jimmy though. The Judge threw out half of Virtual Dining Concepts counter claim on May 30 over Free Speech concerns.
Those would be
Claim 3: Fair Dealing
Claim 4: The Demand for Injunction to shut up Jimmy (Due to 1st Amendment Concerns)
Claim 5: THE TURTLE OF INTERFERENCE (Due to 1st Amendment Concerns)
Claim 6: Also the Turtle
The Judge is letting the contract counter claims proceed, and the most recent docket entry has Virtual Dining appealing the decision throwing out their demand to shut up Jimmy and the Tortious Interference claim.
Honestly, the Injunction demand was probably what did that in for them. Jimmy's lawyers brought up that he's a Youtube Celebrity whose brand is quite literally his speech. Its impossible to extricate the two. They should have just let the Tortious Interference stand by itself without the implicit demand to combine them with a STFU order.
Anyway, Discovery should be finalized by now as of July 10th, and the Judge wants a case update on August 14
In theory after that we would get a trial date, but since VDC is appealing their Tortious Interference claims getting tossed this could drag on another year.