Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber
2:25-cv-05564— District Court, C.D. California
Docket No.
2:25-cv-05564
Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
18 Cze 2025
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Both
Last Filing
28 Cze 2026
Parties (3)
Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 46)
#
Date
Description
Filing
45
30 Cze 2026
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 35 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu Granting 35 MOTION: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court ORDERS Defendant to prepare and submit a proposed Judgment in this matter within seven (7) days of this Order. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026)
COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026)
MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026)
Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed
2:25-cv-05565— District Court, C.D. California
Docket No.
2:25-cv-05565
Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
18 Cze 2025
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Plaintiff
Last Filing
29 Cze 2026
Parties (3)
Parties
Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 21)
#
Date
Description
Filing
20
29 Cze 2026
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. correcting APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan 19 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment against Defendant Majed, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Rom Bar-Nissim in support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment of Defendant Majed, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Copyright Office Registration Certificate for Content Nuke: Hasan Piker, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Bar-Nisim Declaration: April 29, 2026 Order by the Honorable Sallie Kim Denying Doe Defendants' Motion to Quash, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: June 29, 2026 Screenshot of Defendant Majed's GoFundMe for Legal Defense Fund, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: April 20, 2026 Email to Majed's Counsel Providing Notice of Default, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Invoices Issued to Plaintiff for the Present Action, # 8 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Majed) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
Text Entry Order: Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.s Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed on June 29, 2026, Docket No. 17 is STRICKEN for failure to comply with paragraph 3(b) of the Court's Standing Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/30/2026)
—
29 Cze 2026
17
28 Cze 2026
*STRICKEN* APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) Modified on 6/30/2026 (sr). (Entered: 06/29/2026)
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness
4:25-cv-00459— District Court, W.D. Missouri
Docket No.
4:25-cv-00459
Court
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Filed
18 Cze 2025
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Both
Last Filing
7 Gru 2025
Parties (3)
Parties
Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 36)
#
Date
Description
Filing
27
7 Gru 2025
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025)
STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025)
Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025)
In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc.
3:25-mc-80296— District Court, N.D. California
Docket No.
3:25-mc-80296
Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
21 Wrz 2025
Nature of Suit
890 Other Statutory Actions
Cause
Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
3 Cze 2026
Parties (2)
Parties
Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 60)
#
Date
Description
Filing
48
1 Cze 2026
USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026)
USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026)
Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026)
NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026)
In the contest of who is the dumbest cunt in this case, Frogan was won hands-down. Plus she's fat. I look forward to the uncloaking of the rest of the redditors too.
To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.
Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.
But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.
To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.
Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.
But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.
Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.
If Ethan's lawyer's descriptions are accurate, Frogan is going to have to throw her lawyer directly under the bus, without mercy. It doesn't read like a single mistake, an emergency, or anything generally excusable stopping him. Her lawyer missed 3 deadlines in a row, then Rom even waited an extra week before filing for default.
To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.
Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.
But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.
Can't beat them in warfare, can't beat them in lawfare.
You know, at this point I'm thinking that either the Arabs (and other assorted sand niggers) are either extremely incompetent or simply enjoy getting beaten by the kikes.
Presumably, like Kaceytron, all of the fundraser is being returned to Israel.
Lets see who donated.
That's rough. Who will save Palestine from the H3H3 podcast now?
At this point I now am wondering if it was a strategic move. Calling Ethan's bluff.
I honestly don't really think Ethan wanted money out of this -- he wanted an apology and some recognition that he was right (at least in some capacity).
There is a world where now she's testing Ethan. He probably made a million statements in negotiations that he isnt actually in it for the money, etc., he would take an apology and whatever is left of what was crowdfunded and it would go away.
And, really, what does Ethan do next? Can't garnish her wages, she doesn't work. No property to put a lien on. Levy bank account? We'll she isnt going to assist with that, probably hides whatever assets she has, and he will have to subpoena her for information. Which she wont comply with, and then get another default judgment against her. The list goes on and on.
All the while she will cry to the internet about the Jew, who probably doesnt have it in him to go to these lengths (especially after how he softened his stance against iDubbbz in his last podcast discussion).
The lingering default judgment would fuck up her financial life if she was ever going to act like a real adult (e.g. try for a mortgage). But she won't. She will linger on the fringe of productive society all her life and collect welfare and benefits probably at the end of the day. And after all, what's more pathetic than that?
What kills me is that this is not even a bolt from the blue shenanigans filing by Kleins lawyers. They wrote in red text that they intended to pursue litigation and that a response was needed by May 11. And they still waited an entire week before filing for default. So Frogan has a hard fucking challenge here to argue why she shouldn't be held in default. Not saying she won't figure out how to get out of it. But getting out of it is almost certainly going to cost way more money then what it would have cost to just do the goy shuffle and hand over the crowd funding bag.
Ethan Klein has filed a motion requesting default judgement against Frogan.
The settlement negotiations failed and Frogan did not reply to the complaint in time.
At this point I now am wondering if it was a strategic move. Calling Ethan's bluff.
I honestly don't really think Ethan wanted money out of this -- he wanted an apology and some recognition that he was right (at least in some capacity).
There is a world where now she's testing Ethan. He probably made a million statements in negotiations that he isnt actually in it for the money, etc., he would take an apology and whatever is left of what was crowdfunded and it would go away.
And, really, what does Ethan do next? Can't garnish her wages, she doesn't work. No property to put a lien on. Levy bank account? We'll she isnt going to assist with that, probably hides whatever assets she has, and he will have to subpoena her for information. Which she wont comply with, and then get another default judgment against her. The list goes on and on.
All the while she will cry to the internet about the Jew, who probably doesnt have it in him to go to these lengths (especially after how he softened his stance against iDubbbz in his last podcast discussion).
The lingering default judgment would fuck up her financial life if she was ever going to act like a real adult (e.g. try for a mortgage). But she won't. She will linger on the fringe of productive society all her life and collect welfare and benefits probably at the end of the day. And after all, what's more pathetic than that?
The idea of Ethen being such a malicious Jew that he sends her a 10 dollar superchat because he know he'll just get it back when twitch/youtube has to payout is very funny.
This is just a guess, but I wonder if Frogan is doing this on purpose because she would rather take the default judgement than make an apology video or fight it. I'm not saying that's smart, but this is beyond incompetence at this point, it seems intentional.
