she's gonna accuse another third party of orchestrating the whole thing and possibly invent another sibling / another degree for herself.
Right? Face facts bros, Chris is the monster we always knew he was. He is to blame for what he did, but I think it's worth knowing if anyone else shares any of that blame. I hope his new sock of Bella's is legit her and has some answers, cause shit looks bleak.
There is no more at the current moment, but I'll PM in case I continue making clips like that
Legally you probably don't have to, but morally you should if it's actual CP, as in stuff featuring real children.
That, or if they can find other evidence of rape, like bruises, tears on her clown hole, or semen, but the latter two could still happen if they had unprotected sex and Barb's china doesn't lubricate itself properly anymore and Chris didn't use lube. A proper confession could get the charge too. But bondage and incest chat screenshots shared online out of context probably won't be of much help, regardless of if Chris confessed in them. They'll have to search Chris' phone, maybe other electronics, and subpoena the phone carrier and/or Facebook, Twitter, and whatever apps they were using to chat to get raw unedited chat logs from the server.
It's not very enforceable at all. As gross as it is, loli and shota porn were ruled as being legal by the US Supreme Court. Pornography is protected by the first amendment, except CP because protecting children from abuse is much more important than freedom of expression. Because no real children are at risk with loli and shota it's not immune from the protection by the first amendment. I can't imagine Texas state law actually trumps the US Constitution, especially if they appeal the conviction and make their way to the US Supreme Court.
Not necessarily. They could just be using their discretion and charging a 79-year-old woman isn't worth it when she looks like she could drop dead any minute. If her mental state were proven to be as bad as people think they would've filed a rape charge. Maybe one is coming depending on what their investigation reveals. but the lack of a charge against Barb doesn't prove anything.
I see what you're saying now. I assumed it was statutory that she wouldn't be consenting due to a) age b) mental condition c) evidence of physical struggle (the latter is assumed.)
Given the amount of misinformation out there, much of which apparently published by Isabella and/or Luis themselves, I think it'd be wise for anything "Bella" has to say to be filtered through a trusted Farmer such as Spooky. Whilst it's true that said info would eventually be verified anyway, we could probably avoid an extra 20 or 30 pages of horseshit by following the process set by Grant's interaction with the Farms.
It's GiBi all over again...
It's been said that people that work with or have experiance in dealing with dementia patients are skeptical of its authenticity, supposedly her behavior and responses do not correlate with what would be expected from someone with dementia. However I am no expert myself so take it as you will.
Apparently im too much of a retard to know this reference. Instrumental souded familiar though
Even if she was able to consent, Chris said she said no and expressed reluctance multiple times. So he's pretty much a rapist no matter what way you look at it.
Personal theory is that Bella planned to get Fiona to hook up with Chris, film it hence the "I'll watch you two" in the call, and leak it to fuck over the two autists for clout
He got shamed into taking the video down and fucked off back to Twitter.
21st Century Schizoid Man. King Crimson.Apparently im too much of a retard to know this reference. Instrumental souded familiar though
Just say what you're gonna fucking say. Stop LARPing