Culture Midwifery magazine shares gorgeous cover celebrating trans men who give birth

Link

Midwifery magazine shares gorgeous cover celebrating trans men who give birth​

JOSH MILTON JULY 1, 2021
C57D0052-D0ED-4317-9986-3284DC943D52.jpeg

A British midwifery magazine has shared an incredible cover that shows that, yes, trans men can give birth – and you bet it ticked off transphobes.

In a cover designed by illustrator Lauren Rebbeck for its 24th volume in May, The Practising Midwife emphatically said that trans men who give birth are “amazing”.

Part of the magazine’s Normal Birth series, the cover features a trans Black man after giving birth to a baby as his partner looks on in pride. His fist raised in the air, showing a rainbow tattoo with the words “right on” underneath.

Of course, because their hobby is hate, the cover quickly became the target of transphobic Twitter trolls and anti-trans pressure groups.

After The Practising Midwife shared a roundup of some of its recent covers in June, it abruptly entered the radar of a cavalcade of anti-trans Twitter accounts who decided to focus their collective efforts on attacking a… midwifery magazine.

This being from the same group who have previously assailed a mental health charity for, er, proudly standing up for trans rights.

But the magazine refused to be buffeted by the pile-on and issued a statement on Twitteron Monday (28 June), proudly coming out swinging for trans rights.

“We are committed to representation at all levels and also to ensuring that our publications provide a safe space for all birthing people and maternity care workers to learn, care and share with one another,” it read.
4BB90F3D-4829-4ACF-8787-923EEAD02355.jpeg

“We do not welcome or invite any commentary that compromises these values.”

And readers and fans alike agreed. Countless trans folk, allies, community leaders and activist groups praised the cover as “beautiful” and for its unbridled ability to rankle transphobes.
77A450A5-50B7-44BB-82E0-A50837F30FA7.jpeg
E72AA767-B00A-4BEA-8F7E-CA56A1B4CAF8.jpeg
798D35DE-931B-4B41-8A57-E34EAC6D8199.jpeg
EA178482-335C-4FEE-86CD-10A45E80312C.jpeg
3E297A3A-9013-4205-BB1A-310719AAA364.jpeg
The issue itself featured an article that sought to shine a spotlight on transmasculine maternity care as part of a wider conversation on making maternity care in England more inclusive.

It featured insight from an array of healthcare providers and academics exploring the barriers that trans men encounter from healthcare providers while calling for policy-makers to take action.
 
I find it so fucking funny Democrats are dehumanizing women as 'Birthing People'. That's what you do now Women. You're birthing vessels. Women's Rights 2021!!!!!
 
I would imagine being on reverse tranny drugs while being pregnant would end up creating some kind of tard baby but I don't really know. The kids fucked either way since his mom thinks shes a man.
 
The tiny baby grasps uselessly at his mutilated mother's moob. He will find no nourishment there. As his mother parodoxically decided to yeet her breasts in order to become a 'man', while using her uterus to produce a child she can no longer feed.

The child's first meal will be a heavily advertised product laced with soy, prepping him to be a consoomer for life.
 
a safe space for all birthing people

Well yes. People are mammals and therefore do give birth. But only if they are people who were born female. A medical facility that can't deal with this well known fact of biology is not one where I'd want to be treated for anything.

transmasculine maternity care

TRIGGERED! :mad:

"Maternity" is non-inclusive gendered language. It implies motherhood, which is a very transphobic concept. I believe the correct term was mentioned earlier in the article as "birthing people". So I think that "theyternity" would be a better choice. That way you won't trigger non-binary persons of pregnancy.

Sadly, things are so bad that I could argue these points to the author and get a full apology and an article update.

God needs to break his promise and bring back the flood.
 
Well yes. People are mammals and therefore do give birth. But only if they are people who were born female. A medical facility that can't deal with this well known fact of biology is not one where I'd want to be treated for anything.



TRIGGERED! :mad:

"Maternity" is non-inclusive gendered language. It implies motherhood, which is a very transphobic concept. I believe the correct term was mentioned earlier in the article as "birthing people". So I think that "theyternity" would be a better choice. That way you won't trigger non-binary persons of pregnancy.

Sadly, things are so bad that I could argue these points to the author and get a full apology and an article update.

God needs to break his promise and bring back the flood.

But God said when he cleanses the Earth again, he will do it this time with FIRE. Let us accelerate and assist God's plan to fruition. Praise be the Word of the Lord.
 
Mental {Illness} Gymnastics Gold Medal Level

A trans man gives birth. Which means another "man" donated "his" sperm to the troon, which means the troon still drops eggs, and has all the plumbing of a biological female, but is indeed a man..

SHUT UP BIGOT!!! He's a man that has babies out of his penilemanavagina!! It's science!!!!
 
I don't even feel sentimental when I watch babies being born but there is still something very jarring and absurd about the depiction of an obese dad having just produced a slimey infant from his loins.
Like so many other things on the Internet, it's a fetish. It sexually arouses some people.

Maybe even the people who drew the cover.
 
...okay, Midwifery, I know that you probably couldnt find any ftm mothers to actually cover for this photo shoot, but what the fuck is this drawing?

What sort of pretentious faggot would get a tattoo on the bottom of their arm, invisible except in this one instance where you raise your arm to signal someone?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole