Under Biden immigration change, more Central American children may join family in U.S. - Do not come?

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Corpun
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

WASHINGTON —
Under new Biden immigration policy, far more Central American children could be reunited with family members already in the United States.
The Biden administration on Tuesday announced the major expansion of a program that would allow many such youths into the country legally, part of its stated goal to increase “legal pathways” for immigration. The changes could boost the number of Salvadoran, Guatemalan and Honduran children joining their families in the U.S. from several hundred to tens of thousands.

“It could be a substantial increase, and we hope it will be,” a senior administration official said in an interview, speaking on condition of anonymity to brief a reporter on the policy before its formal announcement.

“This is going to be a lifesaving measure for so many children in danger,” said Daniella Burgi-Palomino, who handles immigration issues for the Latin America Working Group, a Washington-based advocacy and research organization. “This is not going to help absolutely everyone ... but so many more children will have access.”

The Central American Minors Program, as it is known, focuses on children and youths from the so-called Northern Triangle countries of the region just south of Mexico. The countries, which produce the majority of migrants attempting to reach the U.S. border, are a priority target for President Biden in his efforts to improve the immigration system and make it more “humane” and orderly, a task he has assigned to Vice President Kamala Harris.

Harris, during a recent tour of Mexico and Guatemala, repeatedly emphasized the need for legal ways for migrants to travel to and remain in the U.S., reducing the illegal, chaotic and dangerous journeys that thousands attempt to make.

The Central American Minors Program had allowed parents living legally in the U.S. to petition to have their children reunited with them. And it allowed those attempting to go to the U.S. to apply and await the processing of their applications in their home country.

If intelligent automation can steer a crewless ship across the ocean, what can it do for your business?
Former President Trump abruptly shut down the program in 2018, stranding more than 3,000 family-reunification cases already being processed.
Biden, vowing to end some of what he termed Trump’s more cruel policies, issued an executive order on March 10 that revived the program. U.S. immigration and State Department officials began attempting to relocate the pending cases, reaching around 1,100 as of now, the administration official said.

“We see this as righting a wrong,” the official said.

Tuesday’s decision vastly increases the potential pool of children who will be allowed to seek entry. It expands the categories of adults who may petition for children to join them, adding to the mix legal guardians and parents whose legal status in the U.S. is still being processed, including those with pending asylum cases or application for what is known as a U visa given to victims of violence, the official said.
The official said there could be at least 100,000 newly eligible petitioners.
Many of the children and youths — who must be unmarried and younger than 21 — also will be allowed to avail themselves of the U.S. Refugees Admissions Program, which provides numerous benefits and is also being expanded by the Biden administration, the official said.

“We are firmly committed to welcoming people to the United States with humanity and respect, as well as providing a legal alternative to irregular migration,” Secretaries of State Antony J. Blinken and Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas said in a joint statement.

They reiterated that the expansion of this program was part of a broader effort to provide additional legal access to safer immigration.

The Biden administration has come under criticism from the left for failing to end some Trump-era policies that continue to see immigrants turned away from the border, including those legally seeking asylum. And from the right, Biden, and especially Harris, have faced withering criticism for an increase in the numbers of people arriving at the border, encouraged by a perception that this government will be more lenient on migrants, and for failing to stop it.

The Central American Minors program was established during the Obama administration following the arrival of thousands of unaccompanied youths at the southern U.S. border in 2014.

At the time, the Obama policy was criticized by some in the immigration-advocacy community for setting too narrow a pathway because few families met the criteria to apply for retrieving their children.

If the new expansion succeeds, “it could potentially take a much bigger bite” out of the huge numbers of children and young adults hoping to migrate northward, said Julia Gelatt, a senior analyst at the Migration Policy Institute in Washington.

“The goal, before and now, was to provide an alternative to the really dangerous trip so many are taking,” she said.
The in-country processing will resume with Tuesday’s announcement, administration officials said. Advocates warned against allowing burdensome backlogs to form in El Salvador, Guatemala or Honduras, with screening, interviews, vetting and cross-border paperwork that delays and ultimately discourages applicants, some of whom feel too at risk to wait it out.
 
Why the fuck we we letting unaccompanied minors into this country just because they claim their mom and dad abandoned them in some shithole? Send the parents back.
 
Ain't gonna save your welfare state, all the factories are in China, Jews own your currency, the currency is debased, warring tribes no longer have to assimilate, the "great" Salad bowl is diffuse, and Balkanization is now a Hope for anyone with sense. The collapse of an Empire is always a messy thing.
But at least our stock in Latinas is increasing. They truly are our future.
 
And yet the parents "cry and pray" for Telemundo while their kids starve in the desert....despite Mexican women literally pimping out their daughters in the US.
 
Ain't gonna save your welfare state, all the factories are in China, Jews own your currency, the currency is debased, warring tribes no longer have to assimilate, the "great" Salad bowl is diffuse, and Balkanization is now a Hope for anyone with sense. The collapse of an Empire is always a messy thing.
And the niggers. Don't even get me started about the niggers...
 
It's depressing that I've grown so accustomed to language Fuckery that my assumption was that this was about anchor babies and they were restructuring the sentence to make it sound like the child was the one moving to meet the parents in the US rather than vice versa. In legitimately surprised that this is about children coming to meet their parents.

I hate this program. If this has to be a thing, make it so for all children, not just Central American ones. Why should they get priority based on proximity? We should assign priority based on need and the type of persecution they're fleeing.
 
I really don't understand why some Americans see it as their responsibility to shelter people from other shithole nations. It doesn't make sense, is it cause they're the biggest and have the most money? Resources aren't infinite, eventually you poor fucks are gonna run out of room and it's gonna make life shittier for everyone.

It doesn't help the shithole nations anyway, it just makes them worse and encourages economic stagnation. Why work hard in your home country for pesos when you can cross the border and make triple the wage in gringo dollars for half the work and send it back to get taxed by your home country? This sort of thing just allows despots and criminal politicians from said shithole nations to keep stealing from their country and keep it a shithole filled with obedient sheep serf bitches with no ambitions beyond jumping to Americaland where the streets are paved with gold.

Why don't you guys use whatever budget you have for this shit and make deals with these places to improve the quality of life over there? I'm not talking aid packages that will be stolen by said politicians, I'm talking like tangible projects that benefit both parties. But nah, sustaining this system that is clearly going to collapse into itself eventually is the best bet.
 
I really don't understand why some Americans see it as their responsibility to shelter people from other shithole nations.
American kids grow up in luxury with every need catered to, so they don't realize the cost of taking care of themselves much less a total stranger. They think it's just normal to have insurance for everything including your voice because even the most dysfunctional TV families have insurance. The indoctrination is so strong that when a kid doesn't have those things, they assume that's because their parents are abusive, not because they're a poor kid expecting rich people treatment.

I've been told it would be unfair for a parent to say "We saved $X for you to go to college, but if you want we will spend it on a sex change surgery instead. If you do this however, we won't be able to afford college anymore. What do you want to do?". In that case, I've been told, the child should be entitled to both things and the parents just have to find a way to double their savings.

In some countries, you have to walk uphill both ways in the sun to fetch a pail of water. In other countries, you have to send children crawling through muddy ditches both ways to get that same pail of water, because they are the only ones small enough to avoid the gunfire. In America, it is illegal for restaurants to not give a random person off the street a free cup of water. That is the simple luxury that Americans are accustomed to and overlook daily.
 
I really don't understand why some Americans see it as their responsibility to shelter people from other shithole nations.
Word. Why do we need to expend our resources just because some asshole despot/gangs want all that countries wealth and power for themselves?

How feasible would it be to form some form of international coalition with force to just come in and pick off these dictators and gangs and...oh shit it would probably just be like doing an Iraq or Afghanistan, but with most of the world's countries...Fuck. I would just be nice to get rid of shit holes. Just sucks that almost 80% of the world's population has to live day to day like wild animals trying to survive.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole