📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Using a vibrator on your dick makes you have a 'feminine orgasm'

1622697895966.png


1622697917052.png
 
In other tranny jannies ruining women's spaces on Reddit news: furry troon CedarWolf has taken over the /r/abortion sub and kicked out knowledgeable mods (including doctors) who were helping women in need of abortion access and advice - blames it on said mods wanting to hijack the sub.

Explanation of what's going on by former mod: An update on /r/abortion (archive)
SubredditDrama thread: Furry mod-hoarding prison guard freaks out over fear of losing r/abortion, retaliates by removing all mods who are actual doctors or other experts. (archive)
Update: CedarWolf stepped down after all the backlash
 
Using a vibrator on your dick makes you have a 'feminine orgasm'

Wyświetl załącznik 2226938

Wyświetl załącznik 2226939

This "full body" orgasm myth they all had got me thinking some. Its so strange and they all have it. I don't think its linked to porn really as most women in porn don't do violent crazy shaking. It's typically focused around their face and loud moaning. But I think I figured out what they mean and it's hilarious if I'm right.

I think what they call "full body orgasms" are in fact a natal woman having multiple orgasms. If you've never seen it happen, should she go into a 2nd or 3rd it does kind of look full body thing just because it tends to last for so long. I also recall at one point seeing other women describe the feeling in that way in text. In short, the so called full body orgasms they claim to have might be the retarded idea that estrogen somehow allows for multiple orgasms. They just don't know the actual term because they know jackshit about women.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Someone asked if he's getting genital surgery and got super offended and stepped on the podium for a lecture on "educate yourself".
twitter nb.jpg

If you're shaking because a stranger online asked you a simple question, you should probably seek counseling. That's not normal nor healthy.
twitter nb 2.jpg

Notice the two replies that question or call him out get zero response lol
twitter nb 3.jpg

In conclusion: this further perpetuates the (accurate) stereotype that "non-binary" people are attention seeking in nature. In other tweets when he's feeling down you'll notice he has an army of people to flower him with affection. Constantly seeking validation from strangers is not healthy nor stable and a symptom of narcissism. You need IRL relationships.
 
dysphoria.JPG

Trans Activist Logic: You don't need dysphoria to be trans! It's a cisnormative way of looking at it! But I have immense dysphoria from being born in the wrong body and it makes me trans!

Yeah, there are also some things called "Autogynephilia" and "Autoandrophilia".
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Oh, sweet children. Archaeologists and epigraphers - who translate ancient scripts - are often at war. If you watch the Saqqara documentary on Netflix, a big part of it is that the bioarchaeologists who look at the bones KNOW who's buried in the tomb: their age, their sex, their diseases. The hieroglyph experts, though, are seeing something totally different. Both sides think the other experts are completely wrong. Eventually they conclude that the inscriptions are wrong because it was not the original tomb they were supposed to be buried in, so the writing was mostly prepared for a different family. The bones win out.

So cut to an archaeologist finding a man's body in a coffin while someone is reading on the tombstone, "A True and Honest Woman." The translators are going to be stuck explaining how this is ironic somehow, or they were buried this way as a final insult by their enemies. Maybe they will lean in and decide this society let anyone be a woman. It won't change what's in the coffin.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
This "full body" orgasm myth they all had got me thinking some. Its so strange and they all have it. I don't think its linked to porn really as most women in porn don't do violent crazy shaking. It's typically focused around their face and loud moaning. But I think I figured out what they mean and it's hilarious if I'm right.

I think what they call "full body orgasms" are in fact a natal woman having multiple orgasms. If you've never seen it happen, should she go into a 2nd or 3rd it does kind of look full body thing just because it tends to last for so long. I also recall at one point seeing other women describe the feeling in that way in text. In short, the so called full body orgasms they claim to have might be the retarded idea that estrogen somehow allows for multiple orgasms. They just don't know the actual term because they know jackshit about women.
Nah, it's simpler than that. What most men (and a lot of women too to be fair) don't realise is the structure of the clit.

Everyone knows it's just the tip located in the vulva and the rest is internal, but they think it's like a buried dick. It's not.

It's huge, and a bit like an octopus. It goes up inside the body and kind of has "tentacles" that wrap around the uterus, cervix and other bits inside the pelvis. It's full of nerve endings, and orgasm causes it to kind of twitch, causing loads of fast little pleasure contractions in the whole area. Sometimes this does make the body shake, it can be very intense.

It's not something a man can ever experience, except in his head. They see it described in written soft porn or chick lit, and that is how they describe it every time.

I believe the closest equivalent in men is when the prostate is stimulated but obvs I have no way to compare! Does explain why some sissies use chastity devices and try to use dildos in the ass without getting an erection though, because they think the sensation will be like female orgasm.
 
This "full body" orgasm myth they all had got me thinking some. Its so strange and they all have it. I don't think its linked to porn really as most women in porn don't do violent crazy shaking. It's typically focused around their face and loud moaning. But I think I figured out what they mean and it's hilarious if I'm right.

I think what they call "full body orgasms" are in fact a natal woman having multiple orgasms. If you've never seen it happen, should she go into a 2nd or 3rd it does kind of look full body thing just because it tends to last for so long. I also recall at one point seeing other women describe the feeling in that way in text. In short, the so called full body orgasms they claim to have might be the retarded idea that estrogen somehow allows for multiple orgasms. They just don't know the actual term because they know jackshit about women.
The male orgasm is localized. You can basically wrap two fingers around the base of your dick like a cockring and that's the entire area you'll feel any pleasure when you nut. Sex/full stimulation; fleshlight, toys etc, does make this more intense to the point it reaches beyond said area, and I assume this is what they mean with "full body".

So when a tranny who spent all their life jerking off finally invest in a sex toy meant for women, of course they're gonna get a bigger, wider orgasm. That's the entire point of toys. But of course, having a sex toy to stick your dick into and fuck isn't exactly a reminder how sugoi feminine you are, so they've likely avoided doing it.
 
So cut to an archaeologist finding a man's body in a coffin while someone is reading on the tombstone, "A True and Honest Woman." The translators are going to be stuck explaining how this is ironic somehow, or they were buried this way as a final insult by their enemies. Maybe they will lean in and decide this society let anyone be a woman. It won't change what's in the coffin.

Imagine being so triggered about being misgendered after death. I'd like to imagine anyone walking past the grave at night will be haunted by a deep ghostly voice, whispering in a faint but distinctly seething tone: "It's Ma'am! It's Ma'aaaaam!"
 
Oh, sweet children. Archaeologists and epigraphers - who translate ancient scripts - are often at war. If you watch the Saqqara documentary on Netflix, a big part of it is that the bioarchaeologists who look at the bones KNOW who's buried in the tomb: their age, their sex, their diseases. The hieroglyph experts, though, are seeing something totally different. Both sides think the other experts are completely wrong. Eventually they conclude that the inscriptions are wrong because it was not the original tomb they were supposed to be buried in, so the writing was mostly prepared for a different family. The bones win out.

So cut to an archaeologist finding a man's body in a coffin while someone is reading on the tombstone, "A True and Honest Woman." The translators are going to be stuck explaining how this is ironic somehow, or they were buried this way as a final insult by their enemies. Maybe they will lean in and decide this society let anyone be a woman. It won't change what's in the coffin.
I have to avoid PL here but those tweets made me laugh out loud and you're absolutely correct. Archaeologists are special people. They are not usually blessed with the greatest social graces and will call it like they see it. But epigraphers too are very aware that written sources are always biased, and people in the past regularly lied or made themselves look better.

So in the most likely scenario, when troony is buried an archaeologist of the future will say 'this was a man' while the epigrapher-historian will know that this society was going through a period of unparalleled delusion and chaos, and will use the inscription identifying troony as a true woman and its grave-goods (vidya memorabilia and sissy hypno recordings) as a poignant illustration in their book about the end of the American Empire.
 
Imagine being so triggered about being misgendered after death. I'd like to imagine anyone walking past the grave at night will be haunted by a deep ghostly voice, whispering in a faint but distinctly seething tone: "It's Ma'am! It's Ma'aaaaam!"
It’s weird to me how they have kind of the opposite of curiosity about their bodies. I’m stoked to live in a time where we can do 23andme style testing for stuff like potential cancerous genes. My mother was secretly adopted as a kid, we’re very eager to satisfy the curiosity of where we come from and the truth in our genes. It seems weird that anyone would 1) not feel that way about themselves to the point of 2) wanting to erase that truth permanently
 
Wyświetl załącznik 2227211
Trans Activist Logic: You don't need dysphoria to be trans! It's a cisnormative way of looking at it! But I have immense dysphoria from being born in the wrong body and it makes me trans!

Yeah, there are also some things "Autogynephilia" and "Androphilia".
So basically there are absolutely zero barriers to being trans in Current Year, how convenient for anyone who may just wanna do it for a few years to get attention/asspats, then grow up and get on with their life.

Also, please pour one out for 'valid'; another casualty in the on-going war to dilute the meaning of all words until we communicate in a series of clicks and grunts.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 2227211
Trans Activist Logic: You don't need dysphoria to be trans! It's a cisnormative way of looking at it! But I have immense dysphoria from being born in the wrong body and it makes me trans!

Yeah, there are also some things "Autogynephilia" and "Androphilia".
I find the ‘you don’t need dysphoria to be trans’ thing hilarious. Basically if there’s no reason for your troonery than you like a spinny dress then it’s just a subculture that’s into body modding and playing dress up, no more deserving of any special new rights or considerations than being a goth. Not that I expect troons to spend more than five minutes thinking about the logic of their arguments, extreme shallowness seems to be part and parcel.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole