Opinion UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children - The slippery slope is a fallacy

WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.

UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.

 
the older i get the more i look how porn destroyed the mind of this generation. just a bunch of coomers and whores chasing that dopamine rush.
just visit hookers and strippers like a decent broken person for fucks sake
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Pornography is highly ruinous for the brains of teenagers, especially since their brain undergoes some very important changes during that time.
 
Are you in any way capable of contributing to a thread without derailing it into another essay on why fundies are bad?
No-- now stop feeding the whore. Anyone who persists in arguing about how childhood exposure to porn is better than abstinence-only education because "you learn about the clitoris" is either beyond natural redemption or is deliberately trying to troll and derail in a way that puts them beyond natural redemption. Either way, they ought to get the rope and millstone, and they certainly need not be argued with.

(Also, @Not Really Here brought up an interesting point about the "abstinence-only sex-ed caused an increase in teen pregnancies" refrain, namely that the studies that either have this as a conclusion or are otherwise used to make that conclusion had no controls to account for literally any other potential factor.)
 
The answer to all this was proposed a long time ago, but the powers that be were resistant to it. Initially, they wanted to put all porn on .xxx as opposed to .com. This would allow for easy filtering out of pornographic material (to prevent access by kids or at your workplace) but not ban it entirely. They didn't want to do that because they knew that a large percentage of people who end up looking at porn didn't actually search for it. Porn links were tagged with innocuous terms so that they would show up in normal searches. People got curious and clicked the links. That's how they grew their business.

Had they created .xxx for porn, they could still keep genuine sexual education material available to kids and filter out the stuff that kids should absolutely not see. Kids are impressionable and they really can't handle porn. Grown adults can't always handle it, so to expect kids to be able to determine whether what is depicted in porn is either normal or deviant is asinine.

Just think how many kids have died or been injured from trying the Tide Pod challenge. You think they can be trusted not to shove an entire package of sharpies in their ass (like lolcow Zinnia Jones) once they see something like that? Kids are curious. Even teen aged kids who you think should be old enough to know better.

What's worse than a kid whose parents won't teach him (in an age appropriate way) about puberty and sex? A kid with parents who won't do this and they have free access to the internet (and all its sexual deviants) looking for their chance to proselytize their degeneracy to naive kids. This is how troons and furries are created.
 
I've seen porn at a young age, didn't think much of it than. It was just something I looked up out of curiosity and once I saw it, I didn't see it as a big deal to me back then.
Are you fucking saying porn is educational
How else are you able to find out how much you can stuff up a human arsehole.
But don't ask questions, just consoom product.
Cumsoom. It was right there and you missed it.
 
Pedophilia is like Battle of Somme, they want it but the trench are dig, the land is mine, thousand upon thousands upon shells ready to fall in moments notice, And people know they want it. They wont break through.
 
No-- now stop feeding the whore. Anyone who persists in arguing about how childhood exposure to porn is better than abstinence-only education because "you learn about the clitoris" is either beyond natural redemption or is deliberately trying to troll and derail in a way that puts them beyond natural redemption. Either way, they ought to get the rope and millstone, and they certainly need not be argued with.

(Also, @Not Really Here brought up an interesting point about the "abstinence-only sex-ed caused an increase in teen pregnancies" refrain, namely that the studies that either have this as a conclusion or are otherwise used to make that conclusion had no controls to account for literally any other potential factor.)
"Stop feeding the whore that I recently wrote an essay on"

Anyway while it's not something that should be encouraged, most teens are going to do shit like look at pics of naked ladies or RP anime buttsex with other teens. It's generally not something that has lasting harm and kids have been doing similar shit long before the internet (i.e. sneaking peeks at their dads Playboy's and shit). There's a world of difference between that and a grown-ass adult showing a 5 year old porn to groom them for abuse (or telling them it's their fault for being abused for "acting immodestly" or w/e).

Plus when kids get told horseshit at school like condoms don't protect against HIV or that women have no sex drive and are trash if they have sex before marriage, I'd say that's a bigger issue than some 8th grader looking at pics of naked ladies or reading naughty fanfiction when adults aren't looking.
Anyone who is increasingly trying to push sexual acts/desires that do not reflect normal interactions between two consenting people onto minors should fucking catch a bullet. I'm seeing 9-12 year old's having "intercourse" at an abnormal rate and seeing little boys who balls didn't even drop yet with gigabytes worth of degeneracy from their fellow "peers." It has gotten so bad that the little girls are dressing and acting like the whore pornstars they see to get the gratification of attention and popularity. You're teaching these children to act on sexual impulse that leads down a path to be preyed on by pedophiles.
Children used to be forced to marry grown-ass adults until fairly recently in history (and it still goes on in some places). Some middle schooler looking at pics of boobs and showing his middle school friends isn't even remotely comparable to the degeneracy that used to be both widespread and perfectly legal.
 
"Stop feeding the whore that I recently wrote an essay on"

Anyway while it's not something that should be encouraged, most teens are going to do shit like look at pics of naked ladies or RP anime buttsex with other teens. It's generally not something that has lasting harm and kids have been doing similar shit long before the internet (i.e. sneaking peeks at their dads Playboy's and shit). There's a world of difference between that and a grown-ass adult showing a 5 year old porn to groom them for abuse (or telling them it's their fault for being abused for "acting immodestly" or w/e).

Plus when kids get told horseshit at school like condoms don't protect against HIV or that women have no sex drive and are trash if they have sex before marriage, I'd say that's a bigger issue than some 8th grader looking at pics of naked ladies or reading naughty fanfiction when adults aren't looking.

Children used to be forced to marry grown-ass adults until fairly recently in history (and it still goes on in some places). Some middle schooler looking at pics of boobs and showing his middle school friends isn't even remotely comparable to the degeneracy that used to be both widespread and perfectly legal.
"Bro children have been watching interracial sissy bdsm porn since ancient time"
I mean, we all saw a naked breast back in the 70s, so what's wrong with 9 year olds watching anal trans midget incest porn?

I love how you act like the shit you see on pornsites is in anyway comparable to some naked lady in a magazine. Absolute shit tier argument lmao.

I mean yeah, the UN promoting child grooming is bad, but like... Christians don't wear condoms. So yeah. How bout that. Bet you feel silly now huh
 
"Bro children have been watching interracial sissy bdsm porn since ancient time"
I mean, we all saw a naked breast back in the 70s, so what's wrong with 9 year olds watching anal trans midget incest porn?

I love how you act like the shit you see on pornsites is in anyway comparable to some naked lady in a magazine. Absolute shit tier argument lmao.

I mean yeah, the UN promoting child grooming is bad, but like... Christians don't wear condoms. So yeah. How bout that. Bet you feel silly now huh
Idk about you but I can't say sissy trans midget porn was what I was looking at when I was 13

Parental control software is a thing and has been a thing for ages. While it isnt perfect it's better than nothing if you want to keep your kid from looking at trans midget sissy porn (because apparently that's what kids these days are into even though I'm pretty sure most kids would think that's gross af). Advocating for censorship because you can't be assed to do basic parenting shit is retarded.
 
While the pdf has been removed from the UNICEF site:
1622559290200.png

Google cache still has a deformed version.
web.archive.org | archive.today
So yes, it is real.

Also, kids already have porn; it's called Elsagate
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Idk about you but I can't say sissy trans midget porn was what I was looking at when I was 13

Parental control software is a thing and has been a thing for ages. While it isnt perfect it's better than nothing if you want to keep your kid from looking at trans midget sissy porn (because apparently that's what kids these days are into even though I'm pretty sure most kids would think that's gross af). Advocating for censorship because you can't be assed to do basic parenting shit is retarded.
You were the one saying "it's not that bad if they watch it".
When people say "kids shouldn't be watching porn" do you think that means "14 year olds shouldn't see a lady naked" ?
Come the fuck on.

Also, the exact same article calls it a human right that children watch porn, so no, parental control software is what the UN deems against human rights.
And don't act like fetishes can't get worse or more extreme over time. Just 10 years the idea of people watching incest porn to the point of making it frontpage material would be unthinkable, it doesn't matter what's considered "gross" now. Especially to children and teens, whose brains are still developing. AGP/sissy shit would be considered niche, almost non-existent, before the 2000s. Yet here we are.

So many fetishes have jumped up in popularity since the arrivel of high-speed internet porn sites, especially in teenagers and young adults, to act as if it's unrelated is absolutely retarded.

Imagine dying on the hill that unlimited access to porn sites is somehow okay and healthy for kids/minors. JFC.
 
Just because that's the kind of porn you search for doesn't mean that's what kids look for.
Doesn't matter if they look for it, when all of them can accidently stumble upon it when going through these websites. Even their frontpages are filled with hardcore shit, they regurarly promote extreme shit like incest. We're talking about minors whose brains are not even close to finished growing, as impressionable as impressionable gets.

Through sheer coincidence, the rise of the furry fandom, trans community and similair all coincide with the rise and accesability of internet pornography

Again, this article doesn't say "it's okay for 15 year olds to see boobs in a magazine" it argues pornography IN GENERAL is okay for kids. Age and type be damned. To the point where they try to argue it's actually a human right for a child to watch porn. Absolute insanity.
 
"Bro the ancient Greeks used to molest little boys it's totally ok to show children hardcore porn"
"Bro the Aztecs used to practice human sacrifice. It's totally okay to sacrifice those children to Moloch"

What the fuck is this line of argumentation? Is any form of disgusting shit okay if it used to be practiced by some human society?
 
No-- now stop feeding the whore. Anyone who persists in arguing about how childhood exposure to porn is better than abstinence-only education because "you learn about the clitoris" is either beyond natural redemption or is deliberately trying to troll and derail in a way that puts them beyond natural redemption. Either way, they ought to get the rope and millstone, and they certainly need not be argued with.

(Also, @Not Really Here brought up an interesting point about the "abstinence-only sex-ed caused an increase in teen pregnancies" refrain, namely that the studies that either have this as a conclusion or are otherwise used to make that conclusion had no controls to account for literally any other potential factor.)
If you look at the data without being a mid 2010 spastic atheist type, you can see that teen pregnancy was going down for decades without sex ed existing,, then it spikes as the entire culture enters a hyper-sexualization phase before trending down as the coomers turn to porn.
fig 2 preg.JPG

On thread topic, the UN isn't where I would go for ideas on child psychology or welfare, not at least until they can stop trading relief supplies for sex with children.
 
You were the one saying "it's not that bad if they watch it".
When people say "kids shouldn't be watching porn" do you think that means "14 year olds shouldn't see a lady naked" ?
Come the fuck on.

Also, the exact same article calls it a human right that children watch porn, so no, parental control software is what the UN deems against human rights.
And don't act like fetishes can't get worse or more extreme over time. Just 10 years the idea of people watching incest porn to the point of making it frontpage material would be unthinkable, it doesn't matter what's considered "gross" now. Especially to children and teens, whose brains are still developing. AGP/sissy shit would be considered niche, almost non-existent, before the 2000s. Yet here we are.

So many fetishes have jumped up in popularity since the arrivel of high-speed internet porn sites, especially in teenagers and young adults, to act as if it's unrelated is absolutely retarded.

Imagine dying on the hill that unlimited access to porn sites is somehow okay and healthy for kids/minors. JFC.
Yeah incest has been a problem long before fake incest themed porn has existed. Remember how I said children being forced to marry adults used to be common? Lotta times the adults were someone they were related to.

BDSM isn't new either, the victorians especially were huge on it. Generally the more prudish a group is on the surface, the more depraved they are behind closed doors.

The article is from a conservative, religious think tank and is focused much more on outrage than facts. It should be treated no differently than some nonsense from a lefty rag like the root or huffpost. Plus catholics harping on others for alleged child grooming and abuse=pot, kettle, etc.
 
Doesn't matter if they look for it, when all of them can accidently stumble upon it when going through these websites. Even their frontpages are filled with hardcore shit, they regurarly promote extreme shit like incest. We're talking about minors whose brains are not even close to finished growing, as impressionable as impressionable gets.
It's that what you tell your mom? "I was only looking at sissy bdsm porn accidentally"?

Kids aren't that easily malleable. I watched ultra gory movies when I was like 7 and it didn't make me into an axe murderer.
If you look at the people who are into really weird porn, it's all complete socially ostracised autists with no life. Not some innocent promising young lad who was corrupted by accidentally looking at degenerate shit once.
 
Are you in any way capable of contributing to a thread without derailing it into another essay on why fundies are bad? Jesus, you just reek of 2012 reddit. Move the fuck on already.
Dude calm down she was touched by a priest/fundie and need to say it every thread or otherwise she will lose her personality.
"Bro the ancient Greeks used to molest little boys it's totally ok to show children hardcore porn"
"Bro the Aztecs used to practice human sacrifice. It's totally okay to sacrifice those children to Moloch"

What the fuck is this line of argumentation? Is any form of disgusting shit okay if it used to be practiced by some human society?
The irony that some pieces that I read that being a pedo wasn't so accepted in greeks(Athenas not Sparta) because some pieces of satire there's calling pedo( I think one of them was about plato/socrates). My theory is that was almost equal today, there's some powerful sick fucks that can get away and some sucks up that write to be embellishing the things that happen and people write more about them than reality.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole