❄️ Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku HG 400
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Wyróżnienie
Chilson powiedział(a):
You pretty much hit the nail on the head. People who have a very fractured or incomplete sense of INTERNAL identity, be it because they perceive themselves to not meet societal and personal expectations or some other reason (for Shoe its societal and personal, she doesn't shut up about "Ironically" wanting being a tradwife for no reason), latch onto EXTERNAL identifiers like a group, message, hobby or even brands to try and anchor their sense of self.

This why politispergs, and many other types of people (mega "fans" of pretty much ever stripe), always look and act the same way. They are weak willed losers with few prospects in life who, instead of taking the hard look at the internal factors that lead to their fractured sense of self and working to correcting it, opt to take the path of least resistance and become a twitter socialist who blames everyone but themselves for how they are feeling like crap and their lives are falling apart. Its a cycle of self-destruction where they further drive themselves out of reality and into twitter, politics or whatever external entity helps them to escape their real problems.

I mean just look at Skeptic. The man is hardly someone to aspire to become. But, at least on the surface, he took a much harder road than Shoe to "fix" himself. He avoided the traps of making luke-warm political hot takes for easy views and dating someone even younger than Shoe. He uses twitter to shitpost and makes the videos he wants to make. While he did break up, the chick he was with did seem to be of appropriate age and maturity.

The fact that the relationship didn't last long is oddly another sign of maturity on his part and fixing himself internally. Instead of proposing and keeping the corpse of a relationship going for years past its expiration date, they broke up and he didn't make a big deal of it in public (he didn't really the first time, Shoe kind of forced his hand there). If he wants to hit tinder strange for the rest of his days and that makes him happy, then whatever. Its far healthier than what he had with Shoe.

If shoe acted like skeptic, this thread would not have exploded in the last few months period.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
"People who care about politics are more broken than people who read /x/ all day."

Every few pages there's someone talking like people who read the news are broken freaks, and they say that message on Kiwifarms.
 
Rekkington powiedział(a):
"People who care about politics are more broken than people who read /x/ all day."

Every few pages there's someone talking like people who read the news are broken freaks, and they say that message on Kiwifarms.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I didn't say that, but put whatever words you want into my post.

People who OBSESS over politics (like Shoe) to the point where it consumes who they are as a individual person without requisite compensation are definitely not healthy people.
 
JambledUpWords powiedział(a):
Shoe is problematic:
Wyświetl załącznik 2217070Wyświetl załącznik 2217072Wyświetl załącznik 2217073Wyświetl załącznik 2217074Wyświetl załącznik 2217075
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I'm not defending shoe for this biased correlation=causation bullshit, and this has almost nothing to do with shoe... but what the fuck? Are these real tweets? Made by real humans? Are people even allowed to say that kind of shit on twitter? Is person A saying if you eat meat it should be okay to slide its corpse over your dick? Although taking their tweet at face value, they say after you eat it, so you should fuck the meal on your plate? Or your own shit? I can't tell if they're advocating for veganism or if they just want to fuck a bear rug. Pushing the child porn shit aside, because that's pretty self-explanatory.

And then person B, I don't know what tweets they could be replying to that warrant that, but are they saying you're a better person if you can push morals aside and kill a child? And what about up to 3 years old? Like if they develop mental illnesses or something, is this eugenics?

Tying it back to shoe, I'm glad she's either searching for the word Shoe 24/7, to see what people are subtweeting her, or she's searching Vaush. Either way, I'm really waiting for the climactic mental breakdown where shoe is confined to an asylum, because seriously, who does this? I guess there's the third option that someone else is telling her about these tweets, but that seems a little too convoluted.
 
Chilson powiedział(a):
I didn't say that, but put whatever words you want into my post.

People who OBSESS over politics (like Shoe) to the point where it consumes who they are as a individual person without requisite compensation are definitely not healthy people.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
What else in life should people obsess about? Literally what matters more than how the most powerful and influencial nation in the history of the world operates, HAM radio? Following IP2? Disney+? The biggest lie that people say is that rural hard working families don't talk about this shit. I don't know where this big fantasy comes from where most regular people don't obsess about all this. It's not uncommon to see 10,000 people at protests all over the world over shit we would all think is benign.

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit about sh0e: this is actually a step in the right direction for her, mentally. Getting into the weeds of issues even slightly even if I disagree. She had to evolve from bitching about Trump and complaining about goofy feminists, and even if she is being clumsy and slutty about it this whole love of Greg talking about skinwalkers 5 years after anyone gives a shit is the gayest thing ever.
 
occasional serpent powiedział(a):
Is shoe transparently pretending to care about veterans a segue into a new right-wing era for her?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It feels more like the bare minimum of what she can tweet about. Give a shout out to the vets since tomorrow's Memorial day. Surely that won't cause controversy. But then again she also got roasted by leftists when she argued for the idea of keeping children away from sexual deviant parades. So who knows?
 
Rekkington powiedział(a):
What else in life should people obsess about? Literally what matters more than how the most powerful and influencial nation in the history of the world operates, HAM radio? Following IP2? Disney+? The biggest lie that people say is that rural hard working families don't talk about this shit. I don't know where this big fantasy comes from where most regular people don't obsess about all this. It's not uncommon to see 10,000 people at protests all over the world over shit we would all think is benign.

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit about sh0e: this is actually a step in the right direction for her, mentally. Getting into the weeds of issues even slightly even if I disagree. She had to evolve from bitching about Trump and complaining about goofy feminists, and even if she is being clumsy and slutty about it this whole love of Greg talking about skinwalkers 5 years after anyone gives a shit is the gayest thing ever.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I don't really get what your deal is. Maybe you see yourself in her and are acting out defensively. I don't know, I am just grasping at straws at how you could think anyone with over 500 pages on Kiwifarms could be "healthy" by any degree.

Regardless, Shoe's way of life is massively unhealthy and the complete wrong direction she (and anyone else) should be going. She has absorbed herself into twitter and politics to the point where she is not living her own life and not addressing the issues that plague her on an individual level. Its her running from her problems, not her solution to them. She has no real life friends, no significant other, still lives with her parents (last I heard), and is now in a schizophrenic cycle of simping for Breadtubers and putting on a "trad" act for conservitards.

None of this is helping her and is just perpetuating a self-destructive mental collapse. Its fine to discuss politics and whatever the fuck else is going on with the world, but people should be concerned with their own well-being first and foremost. You can't even begin to help others if you can't even help yourself.
 
Chilson powiedział(a):
People who OBSESS over politics
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
In general these people aren't obsessing over politics. I can almost guarantee that people in "political" communities have very little knowledge of civics, senate proceedings, how the government actually functions, how courts actually function, etc. I know people who are political nuts like that (to the point where they will bet on minor elections in shithole countries) and they are completely divorced from "political" e-celebs.
What people really care about is clout - it just takes the form of wanting to suck troon cock and fellate black people. It's why debates about abortion, LGBT, and race are 10x more popular than those about complicated geopolitical problems (unless those problems can invoke some other social problem like "genocide" in the case of Israel/Palestine). If these communities actually talked about politics it would actually be more interesting. The way it stands these people are really no different than a fandom for a TV show or movie, except there's never any new script written. It's the same talking points and problems over and over and over. I can see now why people want to stop political discussion on here. It just gets tiring.
 
mr spongecake powiedział(a):
In general these people aren't obsessing over politics. I can almost guarantee that people in "political" communities have very little knowledge of civics, senate proceedings, how the government actually functions, how courts actually function, etc. I know people who are political nuts like that (to the point where they will bet on minor elections in shithole countries) and they are completely divorced from "political" e-celebs.
What people really care about is clout - it just takes the form of wanting to suck troon cock and fellate black people. It's why debates about abortion, LGBT, and race are 10x more popular than those about complicated geopolitical problems (unless those problems can invoke some other social problem like "genocide" in the case of Israel/Palestine). If these communities actually talked about politics it would actually be more interesting. The way it stands these people are really no different than a fandom for a TV show or movie, except there's never any new script written. It's the same talking points and problems over and over and over. I can see now why people want to stop political discussion on here. It just gets tiring.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Oh yeah that's definitely true, I mentioned super fans suffer from the same issue in a prior post because it all works off of the same principal.
 
Chilson powiedział(a):
We have gotten to the point where we get daily "Moviebob" style twitter breakdowns of Shoes stupidity
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Why haven't Bob & June hooked up yet? They don't live that far apart, they share an addiction to Twitter, they both yammer about politics, they both live in their parent's house, they're both terrible at cooking but bless them they try, they both have hilarious regional accents. She has a thing for big hairy guys, especially in suits. I think it's meant to be.
 

Załączniki

  • Motion Picture Robert.jpeg
    Motion Picture Robert.jpeg
    164,5 KB · Wyświetlenia: 188
Dox Savage powiedział(a):
Why haven't Bob & June hooked up yet? They don't live that far apart, they share an addiction to Twitter, they both yammer about politics, they both live in their parent's house, they're both terrible at cooking but bless them they try, they both have hilarious regional accents. She has a thing for big hairy guys, especially in suits. I think it's meant to be.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Bob's a fat manchild, shes attracted to fat manchildren
 
mr spongecake powiedział(a):
In general these people aren't obsessing over politics. I can almost guarantee that people in "political" communities have very little knowledge of civics, senate proceedings, how the government actually functions, how courts actually function, etc. I know people who are political nuts like that (to the point where they will bet on minor elections in shithole countries) and they are completely divorced from "political" e-celebs.
What people really care about is clout - it just takes the form of wanting to suck troon cock and fellate black people. It's why debates about abortion, LGBT, and race are 10x more popular than those about complicated geopolitical problems (unless those problems can invoke some other social problem like "genocide" in the case of Israel/Palestine). If these communities actually talked about politics it would actually be more interesting. The way it stands these people are really no different than a fandom for a TV show or movie, except there's never any new script written. It's the same talking points and problems over and over and over. I can see now why people want to stop political discussion on here. It just gets tiring.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's barely even politics, it's the illusion of politics. Surface level politics has merged with pop-culture. These twitter warriors are the same (type of) people that were reading E! Magazine and watching TMZ not too long ago. Rehashing everything Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan did last weekend back to each other in front of the office watercooler or the dorm common area on monday morning.

The men on Twitter can be compared to what used to just be called "Faggots".

Edit: I used to be one of those people who thought this new attention to politics by the previously disinterested was good. That anything that got people to pay attention to what is going on in the world was a positive, even if it was baby steps. It has become apparent to me that some people just don't have the capacity or will to understand even minimally complex issues with any nuance at all.

It's not even that they are stupid, it's natural for humans to put things in pat little boxes, it's an evolutionary adaptation. Maybe people who are unwilling/unable to do this should stick to Reality TV shows or whatever.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Two-bit powiedział(a):
It feels more like the bare minimum of what she can tweet about. Give a shout out to the vets since tomorrow's Memorial day. Surely that won't cause controversy. But then again she also got roasted by leftists when she argued for the idea of keeping children away from sexual deviant parades. So who knows?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
or maybe she has some legitimate principles outside of "get money, fuck daddies"?
 
Don't @ Me powiedział(a):
I'm not defending shoe for this biased correlation=causation bullshit, and this has almost nothing to do with shoe... but what the fuck? Are these real tweets? Made by real humans? Are people even allowed to say that kind of shit on twitter? Is person A saying if you eat meat it should be okay to slide its corpse over your dick? Although taking their tweet at face value, they say after you eat it, so you should fuck the meal on your plate? Or your own shit? I can't tell if they're advocating for veganism or if they just want to fuck a bear rug. Pushing the child porn shit aside, because that's pretty self-explanatory.

And then person B, I don't know what tweets they could be replying to that warrant that, but are they saying you're a better person if you can push morals aside and kill a child? And what about up to 3 years old? Like if they develop mental illnesses or something, is this eugenics?

Tying it back to shoe, I'm glad she's either searching for the word Shoe 24/7, to see what people are subtweeting her, or she's searching Vaush. Either way, I'm really waiting for the climactic mental breakdown where shoe is confined to an asylum, because seriously, who does this? I guess there's the third option that someone else is telling her about these tweets, but that seems a little too convoluted.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
These are Vaush's fans, yes. Vaush is the one who thinks child porn should be legal after we equalize power in society enough that children would be on par with adults and thus able to consent to everything.

The first guy is not advocating for fucking animals, clearly. He's arguing against eating meat, and saying that people who are up in arms about sexual animal abuse but don't care about eating animals are hypocrites. This is typical lowbrow shit that you hear from vegans all the time, don't pay it a second thought.

The second guy is either a troll or has taken the idea of women's liberation to its natural extreme conclusion, that women should be able to "try out" being a parent and get a pass if they decide it isn't for them. Again, if you accept abortion is a fine option for women simply because they don't want to be mothers, then it's really not that different. The stupid science explanation of "well it's not REALLY alive yet" is irrelevant, you are still taking direct action that leads to a child never being born, that is murder and has always been murder, so there is no fundamental difference between killing a fetus and killing a six month old.

Oh and by the way, I looked up @wyvern_tail on Twitter. Very little in the bio. Could be an e-girl since her pinned tweet is a picture of her and her cat with a best friend necklace. But based on the nose and the careful angle the picture is taken from, I'm going to say it's a troon.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole