US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Borscht
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
are u ready to watch the greatest cucking in your life
Wyświetl załącznik 2208080
I am actually not expecting them to cuck. Republican's aren't stupid, they are ideologically blinded, cowardly, unprincipled, and/or any combination of the three.


But not when their own ass is on the line. And don't think for a second that such a commission wouldn't be used to attack them thoroughly. The democrats have made it veeeeery clear thats what they intend to do.
 
1622164368244.png
Well Mr. Biden, my taxes are going up, gas is going up, the economy is shit, things are more expensive, and you want to take my guns away.
 
I'm starting to think I'm the only one who works for a living in this thread and everyone else collects unemployment gibs while whining about the jews and sjws.
The government incentivized people turning into Wally. They aren't the cause (that would be businesses themselves), but they contributed significantly to making people into grifters.
 
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>TFW you're reminded of the despair
Bitcoin dooooomping and the American dollar inflating harder than a dick fucking a fat whale.
"Muh CNN said not to worry."
snek.jpg
I'm starting to think I'm the only one who works for a living in this thread and everyone else collects unemployment gibs while whining about the jews and sjws.
PROJECTION. DOXXX YOUR JOB AND I'LL DOXXX MINE.
 
"fReEdOm oF sPeEcH dOeSn'T mEaN fReEdOm FrOm CoNsEqUeNcEs"

While you continue to make billions of dollars off being one a society's major public squares, you take on the responsibilities of that public square.

For a more legally concrete argument, these companies profit off of supplying a public forum to politicians. These politicians can't selectively ban people from these areas. I would say that extends to the company they use to supply it. A republican can't set up his office used to meet with constituents in some office complex that bans all democrats. That would just be them outsourcing the banning people to the company they lease from.

I would argue that applies the same to Twitter. You might not be able to force Twitter to take in every US citizen, but you may be able to force politicians to not use Twitter as a public forum due to their banning policy.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
She got paid off. BLM is over. Stick a fork in it, it's done.
BLM is not a stable organization but it’s not done by any means. After all, our joke of a government currently is flying its flag in dozens of countries at our embassies as we speak :stress:

Besides BLM is less about black people and more about the (((fellow whites))) who fund and direct what or who gets BLM’s wrath. Turns out, the Democrats need stability to shove their awful shit through and rampaging negroes is the equivalent of rubbing white peoples faces in their shit. So this negress can take her millions of dollars and fuck off because BLM is not about black people.

It’s much more preferable to have the narcotic effect of rampant spending to basically just buy enough people off, which is why we’re talking about $6 trillion budgets. Just a reminder that this is what accelerationism looks like and there’s no way off this ride at this point.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole