Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Twórca wątku trannyfucker
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
So one of the first countries that went full troon world has apparently hit peak trans, and is rolling that shit back after it turned out to be utterly disastrous. This may be a hint at the timeline for the end of this absolute nonsense.
- Dołączono
- 4 Mar 2020
I can't stand people, tranny or otherwise, who think a doctor's job is to do whatever the patient wants. Bitch, he's the expert, not you. It's no surprise that trannies are infamous for doctor shopping. If you can't get a doctor to agree to put you on pseuoscientific treatment, just keep shopping until you find a crank who will betray the ethics governing their profession!Troons mad.
Wyświetl załącznik 2144977
A Patient’s Case Against Dr. Bryce Cleary, Op-Ed
“You might regret it,” he said. “And then what?”
I was sitting in my doctor’s office. Internal medicine. The Corvallis Clinic. My primary care provider was refusing me treatment.
When I first started penning this piece, I wanted it to read like a scene from a movie. I wanted to portray things with color and emotion. I wanted to put my two creative writing degrees to good use. But dramatic reenactment is not the right approach. I need to be direct with you.
On August 5, 2019, I visited Dr. Bryce Cleary for help with gender dysphoria. I had, through years of therapy and self-work, come to the realization that I was transgender. Twenty-six years of presenting as a man – twenty-six years of waking up defeated – had led me to my primary care physician’s office in search of help. I was terrified.
A byproduct of trying to stay hidden for so many years is the heightened ability to read emotions. When I told Dr. Cleary that I wanted to begin hormone replacement therapy, his eyes told me all that I needed to know. They gave him up by growing wide.
If he wasn’t downright scared, he was shocked.
“I can’t go against my ethics,” he said. We were only a few feet from each other, cramped into one of those tiny Asbury Building exam rooms. “There’s just not enough science out there.”
I am a resourceful woman. I’m smart. I know how to look up scholarly, peer-reviewed studies, do my own research, inform myself. I did not go into his office ignorant, which is why the doctor’s ignorance still sits with me. There is science out there. Tons of it.
Dr. Cleary asked, “What if you get testicular cancer?”
The science says that male-to-female hormone replacement therapy reduces the likelihood of not only testicular cancer, but prostate cancer as well. This is according to the UCSF Transgender Care guidelines, which sources seven independent studies conducted between 2006 and 2015.
Dr. Cleary told me, “Almost half end up regretting it and detransitioning.”
The science says that only between 0.3% and 3.8% of people who undergo a medical transition regret doing so. Typically, that regret stems not from their own decisions, but rather from the social and familial ramifications endured while within transphobic environments. This is according to the Cornell University’s “What We Know” repository – which summarizes the findings of fifty-five primary sources.
Dr. Cleary said, “Just the other week, a transgender woman who had vocal feminization surgery was in the emergency room. She developed a throat infection. It got nasty. She almost died.”
The science says that only 14% of transgender women undergo vocal feminization surgery. This is according to a study conducted by the Yeson Voice Center and housed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This surgery was not on my radar. It was not why I was visiting him. Additionally, don’t all surgeries come with some degree of risk?
Dr. Cleary, who is now vying for a position of power – a position, mind you, that directly impacts the well-being of our community’s children – was trying to dissuade me with misinformation. Nothing he said on that day followed the World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care. Nothing he said that day aligned with fact or science.
Nothing that Dr. Bryce Cleary said that day helped me.
I can still pull up the visit summary. Reason for visit: None recorded. Discussion note: None recorded. Patient educational handouts: No information available. Medications administered: None recorded. The following list includes any diagnoses that were discussed at your visit: Gender dysphoria.
On that day, Dr. Cleary provided me with false data, cited incorrect information, and used fear tactics to deny me the medically accepted treatment for the condition I suffered from.
I say “suffered” because the past tense is appropriate. I am two years into my social transition and one and a half years into my medical transition. I no longer suffer, but not because of him. He had gatekept my health with falsehoods. He failed me as a healthcare provider.
Now, he wants to be placed on the school board where he can reverse the progress that has been made to protect children who are like me – children trying to find themselves and live their best lives.
Listen, I have two degrees in writing. I’ve been published in journals. I’ve read my own work for an audience, then defended that work in front of a committee. Yet these words are the hardest I have ever had to put to paper. And I say “had to” because I had to.
I am a twenty-seven-year-old trans woman and a transplant to this town. Dr. Cleary has been practicing medicine for longer than I’ve been alive. He’s embedded in this community. He’s on the Board of Directors for our little league. He’s a volunteer physician for our high schools.
This is a game of David and Goliath by societal standards, and in comparison, I am no one.
He is someone – maybe your doctor, maybe your neighbor, maybe your friend – and he has power and influence over lives like mine. I am willingly outing myself to our community because I cannot stand by and allow a man wielding faulty science and misinformation to be put into a position that can negatively affect transgender and gender non-conforming children in this community.
Dr. Bryce Cleary told me I might regret it if I transitioned. He told me he just couldn’t do it. In a way, by denying me, he was telling me transitioning was more dangerous than the risk of suicide if I didn’t.
On the other hand, he did not tell me there was a doctor down the hall – someone practicing medicine in the same clinic as him – who specialized in LGBT healthcare. He didn’t ask his colleague. He didn’t refer me out. He simply shook my hand, logged off his computer, and sent me on my way.
On August 5, 2019, in that little exam room, I believe Dr. Cleary let his prejudice get in the way of providing me life-saving medical care. This same prejudice on our school board will undoubtedly get in the way of making sure that transgender and gender non-conforming students are safe at school.
Please join me in voting against that kind of future for our children.
Sloane Rittner works in legal administration. She holds degrees from Miami University and Oregon State University. Native to Ohio, Sloane moved to Corvallis in hopes of pursuing a better life within a more accepting community. In her free time, Sloane enjoys riding her motorcycle, kicking the soccer ball around, and reading about mythical beasts and monsters.
Guest Submission By Sloane Rittner
Advocate staff attempted to contact Bryce Cleary for comment, and at press time, he had not responded.
A Patient’s Case Against Dr. Bryce Cleary, Op-Ed - The Corvallis Advocate
“You might regret it,” he said. “And then what?” I was sitting in my doctor’s office. Internal medicine. The Corvallis Clinic. My primary care provider was refusing me treatment. When I first started penning this piece, I wanted it to read like a scene from a movie. I wanted to portray things...www.corvallisadvocate.com
- Dołączono
- 21 Lis 2020
To be fair, if you go to a doctor and threaten/imply you are a 41% risk if you're not medicated you should be sent straight to a mental hospital for an involuntary hold.
- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
Jesus Christ. Aussie men should just not try to become women. At all. That's some serious "It's ma'am!" face on him. Worse, actually.Wyświetl załącznik 2144580
Ex-AFL coach Dani Laidley sues Victoria Police over leaked image
Former North Melbourne player and coach Dani Laidley is suing Victoria Police, alleging she was exposed to “humiliation and ridicule” when officers leaked photos of her in custody.www.news.com.au
I like the court sketch better ...
Wyświetl załącznik 2144585
- Dołączono
- 3 Cze 2016
Well, their anscestors were prisoners.
- Dołączono
- 12 Mar 2021
I know there were other write-ups of this, but I'm listening to it now, and had some thoughts.
Wow, Chase Strangio's voice is even higher than the lady judge's.
Sounds like the judge on the left (the one who says "this is just silly!") is leaning toward upholding the policy. I liked when he got a dig in about the East German manwomen who were competing.
He's right, also, that the girl who just thinks she might be seen as a boy and have to have the physical exam doesn't have standing. It has to have gone to the point where she's been forced to do all those things.
Every time Strangio uses "this is literally killing/brutalizing/targeting us" language and mind-reads the intent of the law, the judge on the left asks how Strangio can know that if it isn't in the court record. Your Twitter does not count, ma'am.
Strangio keeps saying the law bans transwomen from sports, but they said earlier that anyone can join the boys' team, even a natal woman who just thinks she can handle it. So that eliminates that argument.
YES, judge on the left makes this exact point a minute later.
Why is it so obvious that trans girls would be HARMED by being on the boys' team or in the boys' bathroom, but then it's not obvious why women want to be protected from BOTH groups?
Strangio: Transgender women and girls ... who are suppressing their testosterone levels are not able to compete on boys' teams.
Judge on the Left: Wait, "not able" just means they're more likely to lose, doesn't it?
Strangio's argument boils down to girls having three options for teams (girls, co-ed, boys) and transgender girls having two, thus: unequal! discrimination!
Strangio also says they have to consider whether a group is "historically disadvantaged" (this is part of the scrutiny requirements judges use to strike down laws as unconstitutional). Then shifts to "and transgender people are historically disadvantaged." But as "anatomical men" (judge on the left keeps using that phrase), they are NOT historically disadvantaged at all. So you've just created a new category they can slide into that makes them instantly disadvantaged by gender and neglects that they are still privileged by sex, which is the basis of the law.
Strangio is inadvertently arguing that they should impose the same rigorous standards to boys' teams too, thus locking all trans athletes out of joining either group. The argument is that even born females are harmed by having to take an exam.
Another lawyer makes a rebuttal about Strangio referring to the definition of "girls" as "gerrymandered." The lawyer says "it's actually not that hard to separate biological males from females." Boys are "harmed" in exactly the same way by not being able to join the girls team, but it doesn't matter because the gov't has an interest in separating them by sex, period.
- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
All I could think about when zir went for more attention the third time was this songWe got another "IT'S MA'AM" type deal situation
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 13 Sty 2019
I know there were other write-ups of this, but I'm listening to it now, and had some thoughts.
Wow, Chase Strangio's voice is even higher than the lady judge's.
Sounds like the judge on the left (the one who says "this is just silly!") is leaning toward upholding the policy. I liked when he got a dig in about the East German manwomen who were competing.
He's right, also, that the girl who just thinks she might be seen as a boy and have to have the physical exam doesn't have standing. It has to have gone to the point where she's been forced to do all those things.
Every time Strangio uses "this is literally killing/brutalizing/targeting us" language and mind-reads the intent of the law, the judge on the left asks how Strangio can know that if it isn't in the court record. Your Twitter does not count, ma'am.
Strangio keeps saying the law bans transwomen from sports, but they said earlier that anyone can join the boys' team, even a natal woman who just thinks she can handle it. So that eliminates that argument.
YES, judge on the left makes this exact point a minute later.
Why is it so obvious that trans girls would be HARMED by being on the boys' team or in the boys' bathroom, but then it's not obvious why women want to be protected from BOTH groups?
Strangio: Transgender women and girls ... who are suppressing their testosterone levels are not able to compete on boys' teams.
Judge on the Left: Wait, "not able" just means they're more likely to lose, doesn't it?
Strangio's argument boils down to girls having three options for teams (girls, co-ed, boys) and transgender girls having two, thus: unequal! discrimination!
Strangio also says they have to consider whether a group is "historically disadvantaged" (this is part of the scrutiny requirements judges use to strike down laws as unconstitutional). Then shifts to "and transgender people are historically disadvantaged." But as "anatomical men" (judge on the left keeps using that phrase), they are NOT historically disadvantaged at all. So you've just created a new category they can slide into that makes them instantly disadvantaged by gender and neglects that they are still privileged by sex, which is the basis of the law.
Strangio is inadvertently arguing that they should impose the same rigorous standards to boys' teams too, thus locking all trans athletes out of joining either group. The argument is that even born females are harmed by having to take an exam.
Another lawyer makes a rebuttal about Strangio referring to the definition of "girls" as "gerrymandered." The lawyer says "it's actually not that hard to separate biological males from females." Boys are "harmed" in exactly the same way by not being able to join the girls team, but it doesn't matter because the gov't has an interest in separating them by sex, period.
That's a Trump appointee dragging Strangio, right? This is retroactively making me like Trump more. This justice is making incredibly sensible arguments, neither the reality-denying shit of trannies and their apologists nor the "lol degenerates" reaction plenty of conservatives have.
I'm assuming the two other justices will out-vote him though.
- Dołączono
- 12 Mar 2021
The woman definitely will. The judge on the right only asked one question, which was about whether boys had to do the same genital checks. But he seemed to flub the trans terminology a few times, so maybe he could go either way.
- Dołączono
- 18 Sie 2020
the based justice on the left, Andrew Kleinfeld, is a George HW Bush appointee
the justice who allowed Hecox v Little to proceed to the 9th circuit at all was a Trump appointed judge (but had also previously been promoted by Obama). federalist write up
Strangio looked and sounded so bad I can only hope and pray that one of the other justices will votes with Kleinfeld. He cut to the heart of her “arguments” and I wonder if they will decide based on the no-standing issue instead of the arguments.
Dromedary
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 3 Lut 2021
Thanks for posting the video, I watched it a few days ago, and what jumps out is what a tap-dancing fraud Strangio is. This nervy little weirdo, in a 1930s movie audiences would instantly understand this character was a shifty huckster on the make. That jaunty quiff of hair, wispy stache, femmy faggy whining voice (I'm gay, I can say that.) Just a little creep destroying what's left of the ACLU's formerly good name, and no one's stopping her.
Hard not to notice body language- the other 5 people were sober, calm, professional, still. While Strangio writhed around like an agitated roach. Possibly the worst lawyer I've ever seen outside a comedy.
benis154262
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 17 Paź 2020
'Hitler Gang' TikTok sent directly to Jewish classmate at Iowa school
The video was reported to the Grinnell Police Department in Iowa around 7:50am on Wednesday morning by a concerned resident, with one student receiving the video directly on Tuesday.
Goose-stepping Hitler gang bullies emo Jewish tranny
Secret Asshole
Expert in things that never, ever happened
Członek personelu
⚡ Thunderdomer ⚡
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 18 Sty 2017
The major thing with troons is that they're so fucking terrible, so fucking annoying and mentally ill, they've literally alienated all of their allies. Lesbians, Bis and gays hate the because they've been effectively replaced. Women are being categorically erased to support 0.6% of the population. Young people are becoming increasingly hostile to LGBT shit, pretty much exclusively due to the T. The only people who support them still are the mega rich, which is basically why its lasted so long. It doesn't have any popular support.
Americans, unlike what the media thinks, are a tolerant people...so long as you shut the fuck up and mind your business. Once that stops, all bets are off. Americans can and will spite fuck you just because. The whole 'troon' movement is filled with trash. They deny biological reality constantly. Reality doesn't fit your insane fucking fantasies. Any science to come out AGAINST troons is not funded. People are petrified to report any sort of meaningful truth. To get something concrete you have to read between the lines.
The fact is I don't trust a single troon positive article because research in the other direction will get you cancelled.
- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2019
Anybody can say that. Fags don't have a monopoly on speech.
- Dołączono
- 25 Gru 2019
This is also mostly true of the average rather moderate Dutch citizen, but we are perceived as rather progressive by our neighbours mostly because of Legal Weed dUdE lMaO.
Annoy/Step on them or get uppity and you might just get a fist in your face and the defense in front of the judge: "He started it!"
The recent Olympic appointment of that fat weightlifting MtF has been getting peoples hackles up though. It really is rather tone deaf in it's optics...
LateNightMuffin
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 25 Lip 2019
Medical schools have fallen. Run for the hills! Protect yourselves! All is lost!
"Our class has been quietly accused of having a mean streak in regards to social justice. We have had petitions circulated (drafted by few, signed by many) to name, shame, and “hold accountable” various lecturers who used the “wrong” language, to the point of humiliation. One professor broke down crying after a genetics lecture which relied heavily on the use of “male” and “female” by necessity. Another professor referred to “pregnant women” rather than “pregnant people” and spent a very uncomfortable few minutes after class abjectly apologizing for having caused offense “by implying that only women can get pregnant”. It was incredibly disturbing to see, for multiple reasons."
Tranny takeover: not a drill
"Our class has been quietly accused of having a mean streak in regards to social justice. We have had petitions circulated (drafted by few, signed by many) to name, shame, and “hold accountable” various lecturers who used the “wrong” language, to the point of humiliation. One professor broke down crying after a genetics lecture which relied heavily on the use of “male” and “female” by necessity. Another professor referred to “pregnant women” rather than “pregnant people” and spent a very uncomfortable few minutes after class abjectly apologizing for having caused offense “by implying that only women can get pregnant”. It was incredibly disturbing to see, for multiple reasons."
Tranny takeover: not a drill
- Dołączono
- 25 Gru 2019
LMAO, to be back there just to troll your professor to tears out of spite, while going along with this:
Here are some examples of formats
“This is a 43-year-old woman with ovaries, presenting with …”
“A 3-year-old child, assigned male at birth, not assigned gender as of yet by parents, presenting with …”
“This patient is a 7-year-old child, gendered as a boy by his parents, who …”
“57-year-old woman with testes, here with …”
“A 16-year-old patient (gender non-binary, pronouns they/them) …”
“A 32-year-old woman (she/her/hers) …”
“A 16-year-old patient presents with complaints of …”
- Dołączono
- 24 Sie 2014
Professor: How do you know she has ovaries? Have you done an ultrasound? Have you taken a biopsy?