The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Głosy: 75 7,6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Głosy: 397 40,0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Głosy: 221 22,3%
  • Mistrial

    Głosy: 299 30,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    992
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
I don't think his information is that bad so far. He sounds like he covers the same stuff Massad Ayoob would talk about.
oh i don't doubt the guy knows his shit and is speaking facts, i just zoned out because who the fuck cares when it sounds like you're listening to an audio textbook
 
Adolph Rupp, basketball coach for U of Kentucky for many years, the court UK plays on is called "Rupp Arena".. still shocking they haven't canceled him. lord knows they try once a decade or so. Dude refused to let blacks play for him..

Sorry for tangent, just wanted to drop that tidbit
That's because the movie Glory Road needed a villain.
 
This is like listening to Julian Baumgartner explain deadly force. Just talk about Belgian linen and Washi Kozo paper already!
 
This entire trial is a picture perfect example of "debating for hours what a person has seconds to decide". Isn't this entire spectacle supposed to decide whether Mr. Chauvin murdered someone or not? Why are we speaking about basketball; calling one's brother every morning; what's the definition of a "threat"; or how much a given expert earns per month? A film director making a satirical comedy about the justice system wouldn't be allowed this much absurdity.

I was shooting the shit with a friend this weekend about why the Supreme Court is all Jews and Catholics and my theory is that both groups have 2000+ years of debating whether a sea turtle is a fish or whether raspberries contain hidden insects.

No topic too obscure or theoretical not to sperg at length about.
 
I was shooting the shit with a friend this weekend about why the Supreme Court is all Jews and Catholics and my theory is that both groups have 2000+ years of debating whether a sea turtle is a fish or whether raspberries contain hidden insects.

No topic too obscure or theoretical not to sperg at length about.
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

How many sneedballs can a nigger take before he is responsible for his own death?

Big questions, certainly.
 
This guy has a lot of theories. I'd love to see him put them into practice. I'd love to see him 'assess the threat' of a coal black Congo nigger like Floyd, drugged off his gorilla nips on jungle juice. Wielding a banana menacingly. Would his theories apply then?
I'd bet this guy reflexively locks his car door when a black guy walks in front of his car at a red light crossing.
 
There is a whole litany of names, both English and otherwise, who were once popular and widespread, and now seem as if they've been invented on the spot, or picked by someone who wants to sound pretentious. There are also cases of names which simply have been monopolised. When was the last time a child has been named "Adolph", for example?

Boomer moment but I'm going to miss kids getting nice Christian names like John, Peter, and Mary. The Braydens and Nevaehs are pure cringe.
 
Maybe he could have been sat in the front seat of the cruiser as a compromise??? lol. Get arrested and ask the cop if you can sit in the front seat. See what happens.
 
Holy shit did he just put up a power point slide on threat assessment? I want this tard to go mano a mano with a hood rat the size of a lowland gorilla high on all kinds of shit and see when he has time to refer to little chart
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole