In the industry I believe that is referred to as a 'Daddy Bara'.
But then they wouldn't be able to live the "trans women are women" fantasy.
The problem with "artist" trannies is that they are incapable of creating anything that isn't bashing-you-over-the-head heavy handed. Why use nuance when you can spoon feed people your "punchline"?
but sophie....
I always thought it was telling how none of these weird Reddit/Twitter autogynephile types don't even bother to do basic entry-level feminist activism. I don't mean that as in rioting in the streets but basic effortless shit liberal feminists do on social media. I don't see them advocate for abortion rights (outside of tone policing and telling people to say "uterus haver" instead of "woman") or try to destigmatize periods (unless it's trying to 'splain to people that the cramps they get from progesterone is Totally A Period Too), I don't see them share things like "women are more than their appearances, you don't have to wear makeup and be feminine to be valid" (because any attempt at passing crumbles if they can't rely on artificial femininity), the closest thing to that is when they try to validate transwomen who don't even want to take HRT "because it's cissexist" or whatever. And of course I don't see them do anything about sexual violence either, if the whole Vancouver Rape Relief fiasco didn't show that.
Replace "trans" with any other descriptor and it'll sound exactly as rapey as it is. Why do we allow them to do this? Dating is supposedly the process through which we find the person to spend a long time with. We're not only allowed to, we're supposed to be nitpicky and exclusive in our choice.Wyświetl załącznik 1981918
Is Refusing to Date Trans People Transphobic?
The thin line between preferences and prejudice.www.advocate.com
I see some fakebois dabble in it, but usually it's just them reeeeeeing that men totally have periods and need abortions too. Not really heard of either fakebois or troons doing any actual hard work like volunteering as an abortion clinic escort or donating to women's shelters.I always thought it was telling how none of these weird Reddit/Twitter autogynephile types don't even bother to do basic entry-level feminist activism. I don't mean that as in rioting in the streets but basic effortless shit liberal feminists do on social media. I don't see them advocate for abortion rights (outside of tone policing and telling people to say "uterus haver" instead of "woman") or try to destigmatize periods (unless it's trying to 'splain to people that the cramps they get from progesterone is Totally A Period Too), I don't see them share things like "women are more than their appearances, you don't have to wear makeup and be feminine to be valid" (because any attempt at passing crumbles if they can't rely on artificial femininity), the closest thing to that is when they try to validate transwomen who don't even want to take HRT "because it's cissexist" or whatever. And of course I don't see them do anything about sexual violence either, if the whole Vancouver Rape Relief fiasco didn't show that.
Here I was thinking that sexual preferences were immutable and conversion therapy was no bueno.
If they exclusively do trans rights activism, the rationalisation is that this is activism for trans women and therefore this is activism for women because trans women are women, and so actually they do women's rights activism.I always thought it was telling how none of these weird Reddit/Twitter autogynephile types don't even bother to do basic entry-level feminist activism. I don't mean that as in rioting in the streets but basic effortless shit liberal feminists do on social media. I don't see them advocate for abortion rights (outside of tone policing and telling people to say "uterus haver" instead of "woman") or try to destigmatize periods (unless it's trying to 'splain to people that the cramps they get from progesterone is Totally A Period Too), I don't see them share things like "women are more than their appearances, you don't have to wear makeup and be feminine to be valid" (because any attempt at passing crumbles if they can't rely on artificial femininity), the closest thing to that is when they try to validate transwomen who don't even want to take HRT "because it's cissexist" or whatever. And of course I don't see them do anything about sexual violence either, if the whole Vancouver Rape Relief fiasco didn't show that.
The weird thing about that article is it pays lip service to it at the very start. "Nobody owes trans people sex". But then it keeps stressing that not having sex with trans people you're attracted to is transphobic and based on global porn searches you're probably secretly really attracted to trans people and lying about it.
Most troons are incels who thought becoming the gf would somehow end their inceldom, when in reality they just became incels with makeup on.
Oooh we could rename them as “trans gender norm”I'm a big fan of the hypocrisy , esp with the superstraightl thing
"cisphbia isn't a thing"
"transgender isn't a thing / being TSE753xhd gender isn't a thing" --
"baby animal diaper poop with child models is a responsible kink" --
"I just happen to be attracted to the opposite gender norm, it's justmy orientation" --
a goodly number of those stunning and brave trans ladies are probably already named Norm
Right? Gettin' real tired of having to remind horny sexual predators in dresses that "my body my rules" applies to everyone and just because they're some "UwU oppressed minority" doesn't mean they are owed access to anyone's bodies.