🐮 Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Useful_Mistake]

Eh, I'm sure she's already drafting a game plan for the next lawsuit.

She has admitted to it:

Don't celebrate too quickly. If this case is dismissed I'll simply re-file and serve Moon in Florida.

 

[Viridian]

She has admitted to it:

Cousinfucker reeeeeeally wants to get that vexatious litigant status, doesn't she? She flat out admitted there that's what she is.

 

[Anne Hyroe]

She has admitted to it:

I hope Hardin’s seen that confession.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I hope Hardin’s seen that confession.

I'm sure he has. It's his job to find things like this to help his client.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

@TamarYaelBatYah motion to recuse? Again? Lol, good luck.

a) You missed the judge's point. His point was that if you found his registered location(his mother's house), according to law you should serve him there. Anyway, due to bad wording on his part, this is probably the best argument you have, not that this shows bias. Your point is completely ruined by your last sentance(second paragraph), which proves the judge right, and you unable to read.
Judge denying that treating Null as a buisness when he is a person, does not show any bias. It shows that he follows proper law.
It doesn't matter what the "best route" would have been. Serving him the way you did is acceptable only as alternative service, as the judge very clearly showed.
Nothing stopped you from serving him per law, and your failure to do so is on you.
Likewise, it does not matter where Null says he should be served. What matters is what law says.
Actual notice (per law) was not given. All of this is moot, because your citation is heavily taken out of context, context being the courts ability (which it may use if it wants to) to order alternative service. In fact, that case presents strong arguments as to why your service was faulty.
Also why are you using Mariland district court argument for this? It would be useful if this was from the court of appeals or something, but it is not.
b) Clearly it's not evidence enough, since Null did not receive service.
No legal citations to prove your point. It's also wrong.
Doesn't show bias.
c) No citacions to support your claim.
Telling the plaintiff that she needs not court's permission to engage in discovery is nothing more than a fact. It was not permission or order for the court for you to do so. The reason why discovery is stayed is not because you are a woman, but because the judge sees that there is a good argument to be made that the court has no authority over Null, a question that needs to be first answered.

All in all, bad doc

Her responce is bad as well.
Tldr on the important bit
Mel: "There is nothing to suggest I should follow law! I made up my own law for service and how dare you tell me I'm wrong".

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.

..... and trying to ruin him financially.

He did that himself by making this site. No one needs to help him in that department.

a screaming woman

How could a Lolcow scream when typing on here is silent?

 

[White Baby]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.

Tl;dr Melinda is physically incapable of reading anything that proves her wrong, scientists are baffled at this new form of dyslexia

 

[Viridian]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.

100% pure unfiltered projection. You're the one who talks in circles, constantly repeating yourself, while never expressing a valid point in any of your legal filings. You literally cut and paste your meandering rants into multiple filings because you have so little of worth or rationality to say.

He did that himself by making this site. No one needs to help him in that department.

Whatever else may be going on in Null's life does not change the fact you have admitted to being a vexatious litigant out to harass and "punish" Null because he won't take your thread down. Only crazy retards would deliberately choose to be vexatious litigants, and only crazy retards admit to being vexatious litigants, but you did it.

How could a Lolcow scream when typing on here is silent?

There's this concept in writing called figurative language, you should look it up sometime.

 

[Deadpool]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.




He did that himself by making this site. No one needs to help him in that department.




How could a Lolcow scream when typing on here is silent?

Kill yourself.

 

[LoverofPi]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.

Translated from Melinda, that's "You are correct and I hate you for it."
We've seen this song and dance before, Mel.

He did that himself by making this site. No one needs to help him in that department.

Which is irrelevant to the point that you are trying to do ruin him financially by your own say so.

How could a Lolcow scream when typing on here is silent?

Ah, pedantic and semantic word games. Indeed, the hallmark of that type of person you rage against being called.

Tl;dr Melinda is physically incapable of reading anything that proves her wrong, scientists are baffled at this new form of dyslexia

They're debating between calling it copelexia and Narclexia.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.




He did that himself by making this site. No one needs to help him in that department.




How could a Lolcow scream when typing on here is silent?

I don't see a full-gape goatse pic here so in all honestly I don't give a fuck about what you're saying

 

[Useful_Mistake]

That's a lot of words with no substance. You simply talked in circles and not a single thing you said has any valid point.

I see my words were a bit to complex for you. Well, let's see which one of us is right then. What is your prediction as to the outcome of both of your motions?

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah
Melinda, when you were married to Marshall I assume at times money was tight. Did Marshall ever goad you into doing things you might feel a little uncomfortable doing, but did it anyway? Like did he ever say you could make a quick, smooth $200 if one of his handsome friends came over and had his way with your body? Maybe he said he would be okay if a close "acquaintance" of his came over and really liked you and inly wanted to "kiss" you. "Its only this one time baby I promise" he said with puppy eyes. Then things didnt turn out that way and these "friends" kept showing up on an often basis.
Then Marshall agreed to split the money said "friend" would give with you. He gives you a 10% cut. Any situation like this ever happen?
Thoughts?
Please advise.

 

[Cynically Insane]

Holy Fuck. That response is delusional. The judge has no choice but to grant the motion to dismiss. She will be lucky if she isn't ordered to show cause before any future filing.

Melissa can't get off the service issue. The court ruled he wasn't served correctly. She lost that one. Yet still most of her response and all of her motion are beating that long-dead horse. She could have used her motion response to argue the merits of her case and in particular, jurisdiction. But no. Her retard brain just can't get over the failed service.

FFS, in the legal sense, he still hasn't been served!

Prediction: Motion to dismiss granted by the 15th of March.

 

[ktotokovoyaznal]

My man Marshall do be looking like hitchhike killer

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Moron’s gonna moron.

Those are some of the worst legal documents I have ever read. You know the people who misuse big words because they think it makes them sound smart? This is the legal equivalent of that.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

@TamarYaelBatYah
Melinda, when you were married to Marshall I assume at times money was tight. Did Marshall ever goad you into doing things you might feel a little uncomfortable doing, but did it anyway? Like did he ever say you could make a quick, smooth $200 if one of his handsome friends came over and had his way with your body? Maybe he said he would be okay if a close "acquaintance" of his came over and really liked you and inly wanted to "kiss" you. "Its only this one time baby I promise" he said with puppy eyes. Then things didnt turn out that way and these "friends" kept showing up on an often basis.
Then Marshall agreed to split the money said "friend" would give with you. He gives you a 10% cut. Any situation like this ever happen?
Thoughts?
Please advise.

Null thinks this thread is bad now? Eventually we (and by "we" I mean "not me but everybody else") will get the grand prize: nudes. Then the thread can be closed permanently.

Melinda, set up an OnlyFans and charge eveyone to watch you fill your sweet vagina with things a

One of the main differences between Israelites (Torah observant people) and Goyim is the concept of selling sex as a commodity. In The Torah, sex and sexuality is never removed from it's content of a Covenant. Be it a male concubine, female concubine, husband or wife. Sexuality and sex is commanded to be within the context of a Covenant, always, for the benefit of the person and society.

In Goy culture people consume sex and sexuality like a commodity. Like food, clothes or cars. This is one of the reasons Goy culture has a lot of problems, eventually decays and fades out. All major civilizations that have consumed sex and sexuality like a commodity have eventually disappeared.

That being said, as a Torah observant woman I do not sell any part of my sexuality, and I never have. I don't give away the milk for free either. I make men buy the cow if they want the milk, so to speak.

Translated from Melinda, that's "You are correct and I hate you for it."

That's not what I said at all. And that's a mis-use of my "translation" approach that I brought to this thread, you posers.

I don't think he's correct about anything he said. For one, his formatting was awful. For two, I didn't agree with a single thing he said. Just not worth my time correcting each line.

Which is irrelevant to the point that you are trying to do ruin him financially by your own say so.

I never made any such statement.

I see my words were a bit to complex for you. Well, let's see which one of us is right then. What is your prediction as to the outcome of both of your motions?

It has nothing to do with complexity. Just because someone uses a lot of words doesn't mean it has any real substance. It's called RAMBLING. That's what your writing is. Hollow rambling.

Moron’s gonna moron.

Those are some of the worst legal documents I have ever read. You know the people who misuse big words because they think it makes them sound smart? This is the legal equivalent of that.

Says the person with an inferior education level.

I have a Bachelor's degree and you have a standard high school diploma. Even if you could argue that you had the ability, obviously I'm smarter even because of the simple fact that I made the effort to get a degree. Ouch, I can really see you suffering a narcissistic injury. You just can't stand it that there are women can do better than men.

You are like Joshua Moon. Always trying to project your dumb nature onto others. He's a high school drop out. And you're just as dumb as him.

 

[obliviousbeard]

I don't think he's correct about anything he said. For one, his formatting was awful. For two, I didn't agree with a single thing he said. Just not worth my time correcting each line.

I never made any such statement.

It has nothing to do with complexity. Just because someone uses a lot of words doesn't mean it has any real substance. It's called RAMBLING. That's what your writing is. Hollow rambling.

Says the person with an inferior education level.

Gaslighting

 

[Baby Yoda]

One of the main differences between Israelites (Torah observant people) and Goyim is the concept of selling sex as a commodity. In The Torah, sex and sexuality is never removed from it's content of a Covenant. Be it a male concubine, female concubine, husband or wife. Sexuality and sex is commanded to be within the context of a Covenant, always, for the benefit of the person and society.

In Goy culture people consume sex and sexuality like a commodity. Like food, clothes or cars. This is one of the reasons Goy culture has a lot of problems, eventually decays and fades out. All major civilizations that have consumed sex and sexuality like a commodity have eventually disappeared.

That being said, as a Torah observant woman I do not sell any part of my sexuality, and I never have. I don't give away the milk for free either. I make men buy the cow if they want the milk, so to speak.

That's not what I said at all. And that's a mis-use of my "translation" approach that I brought to this thread, you posers.

I don't think he's correct about anything he said. For one, his formatting was awful. For two, I didn't agree with a single thing he said. Just not worth my time correcting each line.




I never made any such statement.



It has nothing to do with complexity. Just because someone uses a lot of words doesn't mean it has any real substance. It's called RAMBLING. That's what your writing is. Hollow rambling.


Says the person with an inferior education level.

I have a Bachelor's degree and you have a standard high school diploma. Even if you could argue that you had the ability, obviously I'm smarter even because of the simple fact that I made the effort to get a degree. Ouch, I can really see you suffering a narcissistic injury. You just can't stand it that there are women can do better than men.

You are like Joshua Moon. Always trying to project your dumb nature onto others. He's a high school drop out. And you're just as dumb as him.

Didn't read.

 

[FencePost]

It has nothing to do with complexity. Just because someone uses a lot of words doesn't mean it has any real substance. It's called RAMBLING. That's what your writing is. Hollow rambling.

It's probably been asked before at this point, but are you dyslexic on top of everything else? Is that why you can't deign yourself to read these people's itemized mountains of text showcasing your idiocy?

That's not what I said at all. And that's a mis-use of my "translation" approach that I brought to this thread, you posers.

Translation: "Don't use my own phrases against me, I can't tell if I'm talking or it's someone else since I have a smooth lizard brain."

Says the person with an inferior education level.

I have a Bachelor's degree and you have a standard high school diploma. Even if you could argue that you had the ability, obviously I'm smarter even because of the simple fact that I made the effort to get a degree. Ouch, I can really see you suffering a narcissistic injury. You just can't stand it that there are women can do better than men.

I have a bachelor's degree, I have the student loan debt to prove it; You're a stupid whore, now let's see what goalpost you set up to invalidate me; Will it be "Prove it," "it's not a law degree I bet," or "stfu Goyim?"

 

[Kosher Salt]

I have a bachelor's degree, I have the student loan debt to prove it; You're a stupid whore, now let's see what goalpost you set up to invalidate me; Will it be "Prove it," "it's not a law degree I bet," or "stfu Goyim?"

Have you ever heard the saying, "casting your pearls before swine?"