You do realise that whatever my answer is Supreme Court caselaw would not allow you to use it(in court), right?
Of course she hasn't. The fact that she keeps pissing the court off with her shotgun pleadings does not help her one bit.
I don't know anything about US laws but there must be a point when a judge looks at this insanity and says: "ok, that's it" and throws the case out. As hilarious as this is for us, it is a huge waste of court's time.
No Pam, so far, the only confused one here is: you.
No argument, gotcha.
Nope. I have shown you that SCOTUS case multiple times. The fact that you can't find a counterargument is entirely your own problem.
If you knew even a bit of law, you'd know that's a legal term.
I covered that in my opinion of her docs. The Magistrate Judge also recommended the trial judge to dismiss it. One of the reasons was indeed that the filings pissed him off and was just a waste of everyone's time.
What case? Nutcase.
She's not Hillary.
Honestly surprised you didn't post *munches popcorn* or more screenshots from your buddy Bryan See.
Ah sorry I must have missed it.
I believe she is referring to her Swain v. Weinstien lawsuit
Ah, no problem.
I prefer her allegation that Tony is Null and controls not only us but even national security issues. Biden is apperantly Null's puppet
That's what you alleged in your latest complaint, yes.
That is what you alleged in your suit.
The fact that you forgot you alleged this in your suit shows all we need to know
LOL poor Jersh, he is always being accused by some lunatic of something.
Pam, you said that, Useful told you that you were delusional (he is right).
Hard to keep her stories straight.
It's simple. Josh is controlled by Putin, and since Josh controls Biden, Putin wants to keep Josh close.
When one makes up some new bullshit everyday, I can imagine
Ah yes, that makes perfect sense.
I bet she is writing an amendment right now adding Putin, Josh and Biden as defendants.
?????????
What is he backtracking? He repeated the retarded allegations you put in your lolsuit.
She has Josh in there already under Tony's name. But, yeah, she probably is.
Which part of that was hard to understand?
I'm not backtracking.
No. I'm not a moron. But you alleged that in your suit, so I am laughing at it.
Plaintiff admits she wants gag order for no other reason than to stifle speech. Courts hate that, Pam. And like I said, SCOTUS has made the gag orders be rarely granted. So did the Georgia courts.
That and because they are unconstitutional in almost all cases.