What do you even mean by "packing the courts?" Appointing judges to fill vacancies? Well of fucking course. Unless they're completely incompetent they'll do that, just like Trump did and every President in history did. If you think they're going to expand the Supreme Court, that's not going to happen. It wasn't going to happen when FDR wanted to do it and he had a popular mandate.
I should note that packing the courts is just plan a; they have already been making noise that if they can't pack courts, Democrats in the Senate should start holding mickey mouse impeachment charges to illegally remove any judge Trump installed or is conservative, including Kavanaugh and the rest of the SC judges Trump put into place.
It's been implied over the years that the Portland antifas cells have kept receipts detailing all of the incestuous connections and Portland authorities/Wheeler directly involved in mass corruption with regards to enabling and using antifas as their personal army. To the degree that Wheeler and the local DNC are basically fucked in terms of antifas being able to blackmail them with a MAD scenario in case anyone tries to stop them locally or on the federal level.
Like they have 67 votes. I don't think they'd even have all the Democrats for such a load of bullshit, although they might do the same dumb shit they tried with Trump.
Honestly, if they go after Kavanaugh again Graham might literally Hulk out and start smashing the puny gaslighters. So there's that.
When I talk about court-packing, I mean actual court-packing, of the adding more justices to outnumber the conservative wing type. They’re calling it “expanding the court,” but it’s still increasing the number of people sitting on the bench at one time, specifically with the intention of diluting any potential ability for constitutionalist rulings.
He'd have to get up off his knees in the glory hole stall for that.
For now.
You need 67 votes to impeach a judge. The Dems don't have that.
Maybe so, but I have faith that people won't do something as stupid as that, in part because it would set a precedent that packing the courts is fine which, if the Republicans regain power, would not be good for the Dems.
The shaman guy was at the BLM thing witha QAnon sign. The bagged black sun shield was from the Battle of Berkeley in April 2017. The shield was brought by one of two dudes that were in a pic "seig heiling." He bagged the shield and an Antifa ended up taking it from him. I saw the ripped bag shield pic and thought the same thing, that the Antifa had brought it, posed for the pic, and then bagged it and blocced up, but I found video of them taking it from the original dude in a skirmish (this was a couple years back, so I dont have the videos on hand).
The thing is that the Democrats are in an untenable position because:
To be fair, part of the reason FOR the Democrats packing the courts is to make sure that never happens. The Democrats have made it crystal clear they want their Thousand Year SJW Reich and make it so the Republicans can never take power again. Court packing is the necessary firewall for them that became even more important after 2016, when Trump beat Hillary and permanently tilted the Courts to the right to the point that most SJW elites will be dead or in their 90s before they have another chance to replace the necessary Supreme Court Justices to give the left a majority due to how Trump picked young justices for the Supreme Court.
I'm very sceptical of the idea that the Democrats can rig the Republican primary.
That might happen, but I follow a few progs on Instagram and they're not too happy with Kamala.
Could the Supreme Court block a bill about court-packing on the grounds that it's unconstitutional?
How? Republican primaries don't work that way. Unless Republicans actually pick a loser, they're sending their favorite. They don't have the superdelegate bullshit Democrats do to rig their primaries. So if they send someone who can lose to Biden, they picked that motherfucker themselves.
Maybe, but how does such a bill pass in the first place? It would be filibustered to fuck and Democrats not only don't have 67 votes to impeach, they don't even have 60 for cloture.
Sending someone that can lose to Biden would be a fuck up of legendary proportions. And the GOP is just the party equipped to do just that. How many times have those idiots snatched defeat from the jaws of victory?
It's not unconstitutional. But you're absolutely right: unless the Dems somehow get seventeen Republicans to go mega-RINO, it won't happen. And the way they attack Republicans on an hourly basis makes that less and less likely to happen.
Well if they can just rig presidential elections then how can Biden/Kamala/A ficus painted blue not win? Just send up a Golem that can follow DNC orders and get them to sign off on whatever globohomo garbage they want.
I can think of one way. Widespread, orchestrated electoral fraud assisted by the use of HAMMER or similar tools known to have been developed by three-letter agencies specifically to fuck with elections. Mass- and Social-Media clampdowns on credible evidence of corruption in the Democratic candidates. Overwhelming, chauvinistic support for the democrats from the elites and trendsetters in entertainment and media (who, due to wealth, will be utterly untouched by things like the sudden addition of millions of ‘new Americans’ to the labor pool).
