💊 Manosphere Theodore "Teddy" Beale / Vox Day / Vox Popoli / Teddy Spaghetti - pretentious self-imporant Ultra-Right Science Fiction writer and publisher, jealous of Jordan Peterson.

There was a viral tweet yesterday about Sigma males (what even is a sigma male? "I'm not like the other alpha males" alpha male??)

One of the images is "inspired by vox day"

https://twitter.com/LilySimpson1312/status/1353674278722392066
1611686338760.png

1611686360519.png
 
From what I can gather a Sigma is a Gamma in denial if you go by Vox's definitions, though he would deny this.

This entire Greek classification thing is of only marginal use, IMO (which I'm sure means I'm a beta or gamma or omicron or whatever)
 
There was a viral tweet yesterday about Sigma males (what even is a sigma male? "I'm not like the other alpha males" alpha male??)

One of the images is "inspired by vox day"

https://twitter.com/LilySimpson1312/status/1353674278722392066
Wyświetl załącznik 1873713
Wyświetl załącznik 1873714
From what I recall, Vox explained it as guys who are totally the same as alphas but are introverts who aren't interested in socializing. Vox claims he is a sigma. So, hes totally the same as any alpha male, but he's just too cool to go be a leader of men because he's busy doing intellectual things. I assume sigmas also have totally hot girlfriends who you've never met because they live in Canada.
 
The most special of special boys makes a threat:
1611779851851.png

Bonus Ted: calling his retards, retards.
Bonus Ted: Local courts. "...or Switzerland". LOLZ

Discovery would be lit Ted -- "Mr. Spaghetti, where did you get the internal communications from?" That and the whole chain of custody bit.

Ted if you do this I promise to subscribe to UATV*


* Legal disclaimer required under the March 20, 2020 Executive Order and Treaty of Trent: one month only and only with gift card paid for with cash

Your Ted update brought to you by r/gammasecretkings
 
There was a viral tweet yesterday about Sigma males (what even is a sigma male? "I'm not like the other alpha males" alpha male??)

One of the images is "inspired by vox day"

https://twitter.com/LilySimpson1312/status/1353674278722392066
Wyświetl załącznik 1873713
Wyświetl załącznik 1873714
Sigmas are just beta / omega males who "sit outside the hierarchy" so that they don't have to acknowledge their beta / omega-ness.

I also think it's funny that he changed the whole order of the Alpha-Omega hierarchy and made "Sigma" at the top just because he thinks sigma sounds "cool".

I'm also wondering if he took "Sigma" from the Mega Man X games, given his affinity for ripping off names of video game characters (e.x. "God-Emperor, "Supreme Dark Lord", etc)

Mmxsigma.jpg
 
From what I can gather a Sigma is a Gamma in denial if you go by Vox's definitions, though he would deny this.

This entire Greek classification thing is of only marginal use, IMO (which I'm sure means I'm a beta or gamma or omicron or whatever)
Alphas, Gammas, and Omegas exist, but normal people call them "Chads", "Nerds", and "Neckbeards" rather than coming up with spergy Greek alphabet systems and Astrological Sign-tier personality descriptions. Sigma is retarded and has always been cringe. The Tweet forgot the Lambda - the Greek Alphabet symbol for gay men (You can't make this up). Did a Google search and apparently there are gay bars, gay legal defense funds, and "gay archives" with Lambda in the name. Not sure who inspired who....

Show me a mono-ethnic state larger than a city-state that didn't have this happen to it at some point. If you play the "muh continuity" card: Imperial China then qualifies and your own argument's shot to shit.
Japan.
English is one of the most "diverse" languages there is - "white" is a nonsensical, globalist census bureau term which doesn't acknowledge the actual ethnic diversity of countries like America (a person of British heritage and a person of French heritage).
All White Americans that have been here for 3+ generations are the same ethnic group. No one seriously considers "English" Americans and "French Americans" to be different ethnic groups except Ancestry.com.

White isn't a "Globalist census bureau" term. The Chinese have "Gweilo" and the Tanzanians have "Mzungu". All cultures recognize race and white people. Ancient Egyptians even demarcated Greeks, Egyptians, and Nubians based on racial characteristics.

Most conflict today and historically are between the same "races" but different cultures (e.x. English and French, English and Irish, Japanese and Chinese, and so on).
If different ethnic groups of the same race can't get along then different ethnic groups of different races certainly can't get along. Plus those ethnic groups didn't have other races imported into their countries en masse.

Conflicts based on "race or blood" rather than culture, and low racial diversity is the hallmark of impoverished, 3rd world countries such as Sub-Saharan Africa, North Korea, and so on.
You're agreeing with me. CONFLICTS based on "race or blood" are bad so we need to stop importing other races en masse to avoid those inevitable conflicts.

Sub-Saharan Africans have 70-80 IQ's. That's why despite being colonized worse than the Africans, the Chinese are now the 2nd most powerful country next to the US.

North Korea doesn't have ethnic conflict. Their conflicts have been political ones with South Korea. If you're speaking of North Korea's ethno-nationalism then that's inaccurate. South Koreans are also ethno-nationalistic yet they do astronomically better than North Korea. North Korea is bad because it has a Communist economy and it is being sanctioned, not because of Juche's ethno-nationalist elements.

The rest of your post is just namecalling and "A cat and a table both have four legs so they're the same thing" logic.
 
The Feudal country with like 8 different massive civil wars? Sounds like "muh continuity" to me.
Right, it's just another example of reality debunking his low-information propaganda; there have been more conflicts between different cultures of the same "race" (e.x. warring Feudal Japanese states) than there have between "races".

A "white" and an "African American" person from the same country have more in common than a "white" American does with a "white South African", or an African American person does with a Nigerian.

Or look at how well Sunnis and Shiites get along (same "race"; e.x. Arabic; different culture / history / religion / ideology).

All White Americans that have been here for 3+ generations are the same ethnic group.
Um... no they're not. Go tell an Irish American that he's the same as a Frenchman or a German just because of his skin color / census bureau term:


There are still conflicts even in 1st world nations such as the UK between English and Irish (or Irish and Northern Irish), for that matter.

No one seriously considers "English" Americans and "French Americans" to be different ethnic groups except Ancestry.com.
No one who actually matters considers them the same, anymore than they consider a Japanese and a Chinese person "the same".

White isn't a "Globalist census bureau" term.
Yes it is - it lumps all of the varies Causcasian / European ancestry into one boring, globalist blob designated as "white" simply for census bureau convenience.

The Chinese have "Gweilo" and the Tanzanians have "Mzungu". All cultures recognize race and white people. Ancient Egyptians even demarcated Greeks, Egyptians, and Nubians based on racial characteristics.
*Yawn* - what those ancient terms would have referred to would be considerably different than what is considered "white" today. I'm sure that racial and ethic differences have been "recognized" in different ways throughout history, that doesn't mean that, in practice that they mean anything or actually matter in the real world.

In the broadest sense, "white/Caucasian" also includes Semitic people (e.x. Jews, Arabs, etc) - so I'm glad that you consider yourself the same as a Jew and and Arab.

If different ethnic groups of the same race can't get along then different ethnic groups of different races certainly can't get along.
Same ethnic group / culture, different "race" or physical characteristics is what we're talking about here.

Yes, they most certainly can:

clarence-thomas.jpg

Plus those ethnic groups didn't have other races imported into their countries en masse.
Yes, they did - whether the Israelites imported into ancient Egypt, or plenty of other historical examples, importation is as old as history itself.

Plus, aside from your exaggerated nonsense, most 1st world countries tend to have standards regarding whom they import, such as background, education, or otherwise (all of which would be more economically and socially desirable than a Stormfront troll with no GED who has nothing to offer other than melanin levels).

You're agreeing with me. CONFLICTS based on "race or blood" are bad so we need to stop importing other races en masse to avoid those inevitable conflicts.
No we don't.

We just need to get rid of the assortment of trolls and registered sex offenders who populate Stormfront and similar websites (or whatever equivalents there are of other groups, such as New Black Panthers), and then most of them will disappear.

(Much as how those types of conflicts are not exclusive to "race" to begin with, as far as criminology is concerned - those types of conflicts exist within criminal gangs and gang "turf wars", for example).

The type of people who 1st world countries tend to import are not the social or economic demographics with which race or blood feuds are common (those traits are more common among those who populate sites like Stormfront or Daily Stormer than they are superior black, hispanic, or other demographics).

Sub-Saharan Africans have 70-80 IQ's.
No "they" don't, that's simply an averaging, but doesn't apply to individual circumstances.


Francisca-Nneka-Okeke.jpg

For example, even if a statistical average says this, it obliviously has no real world affect on the fact that, say, a prominent African scientist has an IQ of 130 or above.

Likewise, even if the average "white American" IQ is 100, it doesn't change the fact that you and/or the majority of Stormfront or Daily Stormer users have an IQ of 80 or less.

That's why despite being colonized worse than the Africans, the Chinese are now the 2nd most powerful country next to the US.
No, it's because of how successful Communism is - if the US and Europe just adopted Communism, they would easily surpass the Chinese. lmao

Tell me how a 10+ higher average IQ in the general population would matter in the grand spectrum of things, given that significant inventions or discoveries which transformed economies (e.x. assembly line, nuclear science, etc) were not made primarily by "average" people to begin with, but by "outliers" such as Henry Ford, Einstein, and others?

North Korea doesn't have ethnic conflict. Their conflicts have been political ones with South Korea. If you're speaking of North Korea's ethno-nationalism then that's inaccurate. South Koreans are also ethno-nationalistic yet they do astronomically better than North Korea.
They aren't any more "ethno-nationalist" than the US or any other first world country. Korea has had plenty of internal wars between feudal states or tribes throughout history:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Korea

You're also wrong, South Korea has a grown demand for immigrants, such as English teachers



South Korea also heavily imports from other countries (such as in regards to the booming video game industry:


The same can't be said for North Korea.

North Korea is bad because it has a Communist economy and it is being sanctioned, not because of Juche's ethno-nationalist elements.
Yes the "ethno-nationalist" elements, which aren't entirely separable from "Communism" to begin with due play a role in its failure; such as by closing itself off to potential economic relations with other nations.

(Which is a significant reason for the success of nations such as Japan and South Korea, who are much more open and economically involved with other nations, as any Nintendo fan or anime aficionado can easily attest).

The rest of your post is just namecalling and "A cat and a table both have four legs so they're the same thing" logic.
The rest of your rubbish is saying that "a dollar bill and another dollar bill are not the same, because the second dollar bill has one less paper molecule than the other".

I think you're a bit confused on what "sameness" and "difference" is to begin with, and the non mutual-exclusivity thereof.

In any actual, practical setting - where the physical, mental, or other human characteristics would come into play (e.x. whether science, sports, business, arts, or anything else) - the melanin level of someone's skin would not make a difference, and a competent scientist, athlete, businessman, or artist of black/Hispanic/Jewish/etc race or ethnicity would be more desirable than a convicted felon or gang member who happens to have enough melanin to be considered "whtie" or "Caucasian".

This isn't that difficult to understand, so I honestly think it's denial more than anything else. Would you rather have a black surgeon who graduated from Harvard Medical School operate on you, or a convicted skinhead gang member with no GED education?

P.S. - Oh, and change that stupid avatar while you're at it - I can't take responding to an account with that avatar seriously.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Sigmas are just beta / omega males who "sit outside the hierarchy" so that they don't have to acknowledge their beta / omega-ness.

I also think it's funny that he changed the whole order of the Alpha-Omega hierarchy and made "Sigma" at the top just because he thinks sigma sounds "cool".

I'm also wondering if he took "Sigma" from the Mega Man X games, given his affinity for ripping off names of video game characters (e.x. "God-Emperor, "Supreme Dark Lord", etc)

Wyświetl załącznik 1876270
Sigma was invented by Vox after he came up with his bullshit hierarchy (sans Sigma and Gamma, I think), started using it to shit on the likes of John Scalzi or whoever else he was obsessed with back in the day (Michael Savage?) and then got called out for using it to put himself on top of the social pile as an Alpha. With Sigma, Vox could deflect blame by saying that no, he wasn't really claiming to be a regular Alpha, just an Alpha who is too cool to engage in social climbing like regular Alphas. Which really just ended up just making him seem even more egotistic.

God-Emperor was invented by 4chan IIRC. Vox just picked it up with the rest of MAGA crowd after it spread.
 
Sigma was invented by Vox after he came up with his bullshit hierarchy (sans Sigma and Gamma, I think), started using it to shit on the likes of John Scalzi or whoever else he was obsessed with back in the day (Michael Savage?) and then got called out for using it to put himself on top of the social pile as an Alpha. With Sigma, Vox could deflect blame by saying that no, he wasn't really claiming to be a regular Alpha, just an Alpha who is too cool to engage in social climbing like regular Alphas. Which really just ended up just making him seem even more egotistic.

God-Emperor was invented by 4chan IIRC. Vox just picked it up with the rest of MAGA crowd after it spread.
I was pretty sure that "God-Emperor" was a character from Warhammer 40,000


The Emperor of Mankind, often referred to by His faithful as the "God-Emperor," the "Master of Mankind," or simply "the Emperor," is the immortal Perpetual and psyker who serves as the reigning monarch of the Imperium of Man, and is described by the Imperial Ecclesiarchy and the Imperial Cult as the Father, Guardian and God of Humanity.
 
Sigma was invented by Vox after he came up with his bullshit hierarchy (sans Sigma and Gamma, I think), started using it to shit on the likes of John Scalzi or whoever else he was obsessed with back in the day (Michael Savage?) and then got called out for using it to put himself on top of the social pile as an Alpha. With Sigma, Vox could deflect blame by saying that no, he wasn't really claiming to be a regular Alpha, just an Alpha who is too cool to engage in social climbing like regular Alphas. Which really just ended up just making him seem even more egotistic.

God-Emperor was invented by 4chan IIRC. Vox just picked it up with the rest of MAGA crowd after it spread.
I forgot who said this, but they said it best - "Sigmas are Gammas in denial". Sigma is the OG Vox copium.

The Feudal country with like 8 different massive civil wars? Sounds like "muh continuity" to me.
You're comparing countries several centuries ago to modern countries. Instead compare Japan then to other areas back then. Japan was technologically advanced and culturally sophisticated. Now compare Japan today vs. other countries today. Still ahead.

Tell me how a 10+ higher average IQ in the general population would matter in the grand spectrum of things, given that significant inventions or discoveries which transformed economies (e.x. assembly line, nuclear science, etc) were not made primarily by "average" people to begin with, but by "outliers" such as Henry Ford, Einstein, and others?
Do you not understand basic statistics?

In a normally distributed dataset like IQ the outliers change based on averages. For example, let's take a population with an IQ of 100 and a population with an IQ of 85. There would be 21 people with an IQ of at least 130 in the 100 IQ population for every person with an IQ of 130 in the 85 IQ population. Do you think that having 21 times the number of Fords and Einsteins as another country wouldn't have an impact?

Also average IQ matters too. You need 130-ish IQ people to engineer/design the computers, but you need 115-ish IQ people to maintain the hardware/software of the computers. And you need 100-ish IQ people to be able to use the computers effectively. There's a reason why the US Military won't hire someone with an IQ lower than 91. That's because they can't find any use for them. The sub-IQ 91 people would be a liability. Just look up "McNamara's Morons".

And that's not even factoring in things like "social trust" which decline with racial diversity.

It's not about whether or not you'd choose an extremely rare 115 IQ black person over a 100 IQ white person. It's about whether that 115 IQ black person would choose YOU. Eric Holder won't take your side. 90% of black people who self-indentify as "Conservative" vote for Democrats. Black people vote Democrat over 92% of the time. In fact the more money a black person made the more likely they were to vote for Biden in the 2020 election. Let's say you openly stated you'd prefer a 115-ish IQ black person over a 100-ish IQ white person. You'd throw away 134 white allies for every 1 black ally. And those 115 IQ black people wouldn't even take your side, they'd side with the 85 IQ black people. The only reason you'd support something so stupid is if you're a Jew who has a strong aversion to pro-whiteness.

But what would I know. I'm just an 80 IQ Stormfronter.

BLM 74 Trump 2016.jpg

BLM 78.png

A "white" and an "African American" person from the same country have more in common than a "white" American does with a "white South African", or an African American person does with a Nigerian.
In the 2008 Democrat Primary black people voted for the Half-Kenyan Half-White Obama over the White American Hillary Clinton at a rate of 3 to 1. Shouldn't Hillary Clinton (Full White American) have been avored over Obama (Half White American, Half-Kenyan)? Your statement bears no resemblance to reality. After 2-3 generations a Nigerian becomes just like the other Black Americans and after 2-3 generations a White South African becomes just like a White American.

The rest of your post goes off into "Different religions don't like each other" territory. Of course. That doesn't change the fact that different races don't get along.

Multi-Racialism = Guaranteed Failure
Mono-Racialism =/= Guaranteed Success.
Mono-Racialism = Most Likely Successful when other factors are controlled for.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
You're comparing countries several centuries ago to modern countries. Instead compare Japan then to other areas back then. Japan was technologically advanced and culturally sophisticated. Now compare Japan today vs. other countries today. Still ahead.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA...
YOU'RE A FUCKING WEEABOO
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU NOT HAVE AN ANIME PFP
Fact check: Japan wasn't "technologically-advanced" just because they had karakuri (which were glorified baubles with no actual use) and muh thousand-fold Japanese steel; midget flips with rattan sticks could- and did- beat the fuck out of muh honorable samurai with muh nihon steel in duels every time, and it wasn't because the little fucks were cheating. Japanese iron is dogshit and they had to develop the seven-layer steel method just to make a blade that wouldn't snap when someone else farted at it. You want to compare Japan to other areas? Let's compare them to their neighbor across the Sea of Japan, China. Let's compare Song Dynasty China (900s to 1200s) to Japan in the same time period (known as the Heian period).

Japan, a monocultural monoethnic isolationist state ruled by a god-king through a series of governors:
-Ironworking techniques were primitive and the seven-layer technique was four centuries off.
-The internal government was defined by regular power jockeying and civil unrest, including two rebellions against the Imperial Household.
-Manufacturing was the domain of a few skilled craftsmen, was slow, and many techniques were frequently lost; including the art of minting the currency used at the time.
-Due to the above retardation, the Heian period experienced a massive economic collapse that saw most of the country revert to the barter system and the overwhelming majority of people living at a subsistence level beneath even that of a serf in Europe at the time.
-This incompetency led to the collapse of the original governmental form and the rise of the Shogunate and fief system as the system of rule for Japan until the 19th century; a period so full of violence, civil wars, conspiracy, and bloodshed that the period of poverty, starvation, and incompetence before it would be called the Heian, or "peaceful", era.

Meanwhile, in China, a multicultural multiethnic state open to international trade and ruled by an Emperor through a complex bureaucratic system:
-Paper currency is introduced- initially as an economic experiment, but swiftly adopted as the favored currency of the literati, with checks, promissory notes, and bills of exchange emerging as concepts rapidly.
-While currency was vanishing from Japan, in China it was swiftly becoming common even among the lowest of the Four Orders, with over half of all peasant tax being paid through currency by the 11th century (contemporaneous to the barter economy that marked the collapse of the Heian period).
-Manufacturing began to be organized in forms similar to 19th-century factory techniques, and agriculture was subject to complex and dynamic forms of land management that led to an astronomical output of goods for the Song Empire: in one year, China produced more tonnage of iron than every other known nation in the world combined. These developments were supported by the invention of movable type, the blast furnace, mechanical clocks, paddleboats, compasses, textile watermills, and countless other inventions during a 100-year explosion of the sciences.
-These developments benefited every social and economic strata of Chinese society; street markets, previously tightly-controlled, became ubiquitous throughout the Empire, with countless sharing space in the heart of cities that would remain unchallenged for over six centuries by anything outside of China in terms of scale and infrastructural sophistication. All Four Orders enjoyed freedoms unprecedented anywhere else at the time and well afterwards; freedom to form guilds and unions, extensive freedom of religion (with small communities of Jews and Christians within several cities at the Westmost extent), freedom of movement- which was supported strongly by the creation of the motel and apartment complex in the late 12th century. By the 13th century, Chinese technology- and many of its social developments- resembled that of Europe during the Industrial Revolution.
And- unlike many other nations- even when there were periods of great social unrest and turnovers of the dynasties, much of this technology and many of these developments persisted. The sole reason China did not push even further with their technology was that they had reached the logistic saturation point of their holdings, and overseas colonies, which were briefly explored as an option, were determined to have too poor of a rate of return compared to trade.

So, on every real metric beyond vague appeals to "muh purity" and "muh honor", China, a filthy multikulti shithole run by bureaucrats that practiced the closest thing to Globalism their technology allowed, outstripped Japan, a nation that was monoethnic, strongly monocultural, and aggressively hostile to foreigners, in terms of industry, science, living standards, and very strongly can be argued to even best the arts of Japan during this time (even as Japan is producing the first "modern novel" during a period considered to be its artistic peak). And never, even when China was being invaded by the psychotic Timurids, did Japan manage to catch up- it took them borrowing from the manufacturing of the Industrial Revolution in Europe (a whole nother kettle of fish you should hope stays out of this conversation) for them to finally outstrip China- and even that took China being in literally its weakest position in its entire history as a distinct empire.
This is not an argument you can actually win. Everything about Imperial China melts your doctrine into a pile of sludge and cope.
 
I've counted 9 blogposts in a row without Vox mentioning Trump or QAnon. I think he's slowly ditching that Trump/QAnon grift.

AHAHAHAHAHAHA...
YOU'RE A FUCKING WEEABOO
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU NOT HAVE AN ANIME PFP
Fact check: Japan wasn't "technologically-advanced" just because they had karakuri (which were glorified baubles with no actual use) and muh thousand-fold Japanese steel; midget flips with rattan sticks could- and did- beat the fuck out of muh honorable samurai with muh nihon steel in duels every time, and it wasn't because the little fucks were cheating. Japanese iron is dogshit and they had to develop the seven-layer steel method just to make a blade that wouldn't snap when someone else farted at it. You want to compare Japan to other areas? Let's compare them to their neighbor across the Sea of Japan, China. Let's compare Song Dynasty China (900s to 1200s) to Japan in the same time period (known as the Heian period).

Japan, a monocultural monoethnic isolationist state ruled by a god-king through a series of governors:
-Ironworking techniques were primitive and the seven-layer technique was four centuries off.
-The internal government was defined by regular power jockeying and civil unrest, including two rebellions against the Imperial Household.
-Manufacturing was the domain of a few skilled craftsmen, was slow, and many techniques were frequently lost; including the art of minting the currency used at the time.
-Due to the above retardation, the Heian period experienced a massive economic collapse that saw most of the country revert to the barter system and the overwhelming majority of people living at a subsistence level beneath even that of a serf in Europe at the time.
-This incompetency led to the collapse of the original governmental form and the rise of the Shogunate and fief system as the system of rule for Japan until the 19th century; a period so full of violence, civil wars, conspiracy, and bloodshed that the period of poverty, starvation, and incompetence before it would be called the Heian, or "peaceful", era.

Meanwhile, in China, a multicultural multiethnic state open to international trade and ruled by an Emperor through a complex bureaucratic system:
-Paper currency is introduced- initially as an economic experiment, but swiftly adopted as the favored currency of the literati, with checks, promissory notes, and bills of exchange emerging as concepts rapidly.
-While currency was vanishing from Japan, in China it was swiftly becoming common even among the lowest of the Four Orders, with over half of all peasant tax being paid through currency by the 11th century (contemporaneous to the barter economy that marked the collapse of the Heian period).
-Manufacturing began to be organized in forms similar to 19th-century factory techniques, and agriculture was subject to complex and dynamic forms of land management that led to an astronomical output of goods for the Song Empire: in one year, China produced more tonnage of iron than every other known nation in the world combined. These developments were supported by the invention of movable type, the blast furnace, mechanical clocks, paddleboats, compasses, textile watermills, and countless other inventions during a 100-year explosion of the sciences.
-These developments benefited every social and economic strata of Chinese society; street markets, previously tightly-controlled, became ubiquitous throughout the Empire, with countless sharing space in the heart of cities that would remain unchallenged for over six centuries by anything outside of China in terms of scale and infrastructural sophistication. All Four Orders enjoyed freedoms unprecedented anywhere else at the time and well afterwards; freedom to form guilds and unions, extensive freedom of religion (with small communities of Jews and Christians within several cities at the Westmost extent), freedom of movement- which was supported strongly by the creation of the motel and apartment complex in the late 12th century. By the 13th century, Chinese technology- and many of its social developments- resembled that of Europe during the Industrial Revolution.
And- unlike many other nations- even when there were periods of great social unrest and turnovers of the dynasties, much of this technology and many of these developments persisted. The sole reason China did not push even further with their technology was that they had reached the logistic saturation point of their holdings, and overseas colonies, which were briefly explored as an option, were determined to have too poor of a rate of return compared to trade.

So, on every real metric beyond vague appeals to "muh purity" and "muh honor", China, a filthy multikulti shithole run by bureaucrats that practiced the closest thing to Globalism their technology allowed, outstripped Japan, a nation that was monoethnic, strongly monocultural, and aggressively hostile to foreigners, in terms of industry, science, living standards, and very strongly can be argued to even best the arts of Japan during this time (even as Japan is producing the first "modern novel" during a period considered to be its artistic peak). And never, even when China was being invaded by the psychotic Timurids, did Japan manage to catch up- it took them borrowing from the manufacturing of the Industrial Revolution in Europe (a whole nother kettle of fish you should hope stays out of this conversation) for them to finally outstrip China- and even that took China being in literally its weakest position in its entire history as a distinct empire.
This is not an argument you can actually win. Everything about Imperial China melts your doctrine into a pile of sludge and cope.
Read:
Name one highly diverse multi-racial country that didn't become a Brazil-tier shithole or end up balkanizing under a severe crisis. The US was 85-90% White until the 1970's so it doesn't count.
Why are you sperging about China? It's over 99% Asian racially and over 92% Han/Hui ethnically.

Also to clarify:
Highly Diverse Multi-Racial = Guaranteed Failure.
Low Diversity Mono-Racial =/= Guaranteed Success.
Low Average IQ = Guaranteed Failure.
High Average IQ =/= Guaranteed Success.

China doesn't count. Name the country I described in my quote above.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
"Average IQ" (or other measures of intelligence or aptitude) would have no bearing on the discoveries or inventions of people like Henry Ford, Einstein, or others.

Not to mention that Vox is a native American by his own admission, so he wouldn't be welcome in an "ethno-nationalist state" (nor would likely the vast majority of Daily Stormer posters, given how loose their moms probably were) - the cognitive dissonance is amazing.
 
I've counted 9 blogposts in a row without Vox mentioning Trump or QAnon. I think he's slowly ditching that Trump/QAnon grift.


Read:

Why are you sperging about China? It's over 99% Asian racially and over 92% Han/Hui ethnically.

Also to clarify:
Highly Diverse Multi-Racial = Guaranteed Failure.
Low Diversity Mono-Racial =/= Guaranteed Success.
Low Average IQ = Guaranteed Failure.
High Average IQ =/= Guaranteed Success.

China doesn't count. Name the country I described in my quote above.
China, you retard. It's not my fault your autistic ass sees all chinks as the same. You want to talk about historical context? Here's some of that for you: "Han" is a mutt ethnicity with a mutt culture. Mutt ethnicity because the reason they make up 92% of modern China isn't because there's magically 0 genetic variance in the entirety of Asia or because the Han killed everyone else in a display of rabid supremacy; remember when I mentioned the unprecedented freedoms of movement and employment Imperial China had enshrined as a fundamental rights for its people? When you have a population that can move halfway across the continent incrementally for work or entertainment, what do you think happens? They blanda up, and over centuries and centuries most of the 60+ distinct ethnic groups recognized by Imperial records became more and more mixed with each other, until most of them belonged to one extremely-mixed ethnic group that was, for lack of any better label, lumped in with the "original" Chinese people, the Han. Isn't this that awful "globohomo breeding everyone into a homogenous blob" thing you're terrified of?
As for the mutt culture, China would, and continues to, absorb the best cultural practices from other nations or recontextualize their periods of foreign occupation as China enlightening barbarians. The braided hair associated with your stereotypical 19th-century Chinaman? That's a reappropriated symbol of humiliation that originated with the Timurids.

Your obsession with niggers and skin tone being the only form of diversity puts you on the same tier as an SJW; if you think the Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese are the same race, I'd love for you to say that to the face of three members of their respective ultranationalist factions; you'll probably be able to pass as a Chinaman once the bruises turn yellow.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
While *ahem* certain somebody is sperging about whypeepole (Bronze Race FTW, by the way), the shitty SSH garnered mainstream media ridicule courtesy of the Daily Mail. Apologies ahead of time; the archive sites don't work well for me on mobile.


Ted already gave his response, and since I already have the screenshot, I will add it here.

Wyświetl załącznik 1880770
Vox wrote all that text thinking a Daily Mail piece about a twitter post was trying to do 4d-chess against him by including his full name?

Also, the comments are fucking hilarious, surely this is trolling? :story:
1611949325353.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Alphas, Gammas, and Omegas exist, but normal people call them "Chads", "Nerds", and "Neckbeards" rather than coming up with spergy Greek alphabet systems and Astrological Sign-tier personality descriptions. Sigma is retarded and has always been cringe. The Tweet forgot the Lambda - the Greek Alphabet symbol for gay men (You can't make this up). Did a Google search and apparently there are gay bars, gay legal defense funds, and "gay archives" with Lambda in the name. Not sure who inspired who....


Japan.
All White Americans that have been here for 3+ generations are the same ethnic group. No one seriously considers "English" Americans and "French Americans" to be different ethnic groups except Ancestry.com.

White isn't a "Globalist census bureau" term. The Chinese have "Gweilo" and the Tanzanians have "Mzungu". All cultures recognize race and white people. Ancient Egyptians even demarcated Greeks, Egyptians, and Nubians based on racial characteristics.


If different ethnic groups of the same race can't get along then different ethnic groups of different races certainly can't get along. Plus those ethnic groups didn't have other races imported into their countries en masse.


You're agreeing with me. CONFLICTS based on "race or blood" are bad so we need to stop importing other races en masse to avoid those inevitable conflicts.

Sub-Saharan Africans have 70-80 IQ's. That's why despite being colonized worse than the Africans, the Chinese are now the 2nd most powerful country next to the US.

North Korea doesn't have ethnic conflict. Their conflicts have been political ones with South Korea. If you're speaking of North Korea's ethno-nationalism then that's inaccurate. South Koreans are also ethno-nationalistic yet they do astronomically better than North Korea. North Korea is bad because it has a Communist economy and it is being sanctioned, not because of Juche's ethno-nationalist elements.

The rest of your post is just namecalling and "A cat and a table both have four legs so they're the same thing" logic.
Hold this massive L.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole