I don't think you're familiar with me, hello, making angsty doomsaying dunning-krugers mad by pulling up documents and court cases is my passion, particularly when they try to juke slipping on a banana peel
Yes, that is true,
if you are in court like I just said. Trump has no eyewitness testimony
that has been presented in court. It is as such not subject to perjury and is purely hearsay.
You cannot get a hearing as a result if the entirety of your case hinges on testimony people have given out of court in 'sworn
affidavits.'
With that in mind, point to testimony the trump team has presented
in court that points to fraud, or read a book nigga