📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

It really is amazing how male they all look. Like, a lot of Asians naturally look pretty ambiguous, so you'd think it'd be easier for them to "pass". I guess even among Asians the ones that troon out are the ugliest, most mannish ones
I disagree, I think you'll find that male and female Asians look different in the same way that males and females of other races look different. I think this is just a case where men who try to look like women end up looking even manlier than before because your brain naturally focuses on the discrepancies.
 
I disagree, I think you'll find that male and female Asians look different in the same way that males and females of other races look different. I think this is just a case where men who try to look like women end up looking even manlier than before because your brain naturally focuses on the discrepancies.

Oh they absolutely look different, maybe my post was a bit Eurocentric. I meant stuff like naturally having less body hair, less likely to have a Batman chin, etc.
The "tells" can be different
 
I recall that in Ancient Rome/Greece homosexuality was a side hustle. You were still supposed to marry someone of the opposite gender and make kids, but you could have someone else to have fun with. More progressive than the Victorians yes, but still stifling by today’s standards. It could be that was just how ancient societies dealt with same sex attraction.
All any of this proves is that homosexuality existed and people fit it into their cultures own heteronormative standard. Just like today.
It's also good to remember that most ancient marriages were not about love or even sexual desire, but about wealth, sharing labor, safety of union and having kids. This is why most marriages were not negotiated by the couple alone, but by the families as unit. Sure love marriage was seen as good thing, all cultures had stories about love and its wonders, but ultimately love doesn't bring food, land, animals or other material goods and without those there is significant possibility that you will die, starve or otherwise end up suffering. So most marriages were fairly practical, how the couple felt about each other being just one factor among others. Sure if you can get the perfect couple go for it but if not okey marriage is better no safety net for future. Generally as long as the couple could get along well enough, it was good enough and you probably will grow found of someone you share you life and bed with anyway. So someone being gay probably wasn't seen as an much of an issue when everyone knows that marriage and love aren't the same thing. As long as he can perform to get the next generation, who cares if the husband has preference towards the dick.
 
Thirteen fucking years old. Writing like an eight year old. Drawing like she was six. Communicates with mum via notes pushed under the door. She needs some real life friends to tell her just how creepy all those midle aged men in dresses are. The internet is not a nice babysitter.


The art style and "funny" word choice reminds me of hipster webcomics like The Oatmeal or Hyperbole and a Half. Definite Tumblr casualty.

They pass better than any other troon in this thread because I genuinely have no idea what sex this person is.

Obese troons are more likely to pass than not. Fat covers up all your secondary sex characteristics.
 
It's also good to remember that most ancient marriages were not about love or even sexual desire, but about wealth, sharing labor, safety of union and having kids. This is why most marriages were not negotiated by the couple alone, but by the families as unit. Sure love marriage was seen as good thing, all cultures had stories about love and its wonders, but ultimately love doesn't bring food, land, animals or other material goods and without those there is significant possibility that you will die, starve or otherwise end up suffering. So most marriages were fairly practical, how the couple felt about each other being just one factor among others. Sure if you can get the perfect couple go for it but if not okey marriage is better no safety net for future. Generally as long as the couple could get along well enough, it was good enough and you probably will grow found of someone you share you life and bed with anyway. So someone being gay probably wasn't seen as an much of an issue when everyone knows that marriage and love aren't the same thing. As long as he can perform to get the next generation, who cares if the husband has preference towards the dick.
All true. I recall reading about marriage in early medieval Europe being a family negotiation if you had property or any means and basically non existent amongst the poor/peasant class. Priests were still few and far between so if you were poor and fancied someone else in your station you just started living together and were considered married (this is before it was considered a Catholic sacrament). It’s where the idea of common law marriage comes from.

I always want to smack the faces of people who claim to hate capitalism yet own cheap trinkets like those cat ear headbands, makeup or that plastic 90s necklace.
You can make an argument that access to the internet is necessary so I don’t fault them for that but sweet lord, if your anti-capitalist at least shun the cheap trappings of overt capitalism!
 
I always want to smack the faces of people who claim to hate capitalism yet own cheap trinkets like those cat ear headbands, makeup or that plastic 90s necklace.
You can make an argument that access to the internet is necessary so I don’t fault them for that but sweet lord, if your anti-capitalist at least shun the cheap trappings of overt capitalism!
Something something permeates society something something obligatory consumerism something something

tl;dr "Not being a blatant parasitic consoomer is *hard*!"

The amount of control a cult can exert over a person is scary. Remember the Heaven's Gate cult? Dozens of people committed ritual suicide in order to reach what they believed was an extraterrestrial spacecraft following Comet Hale–Bopp. They weren't held at gunpoint or tricked. They weren't severely depressed, insane, or stupid. Quite the contrary, every one of their videotaped suicide notes appeared happy and eager to off themselves in order to ascend to a higher plane of existence. Compared to that, lopping off your dick isn't so far-fetched.
Appropriate, as many men in Heaven's Gate flew to Mexico to get the ol' snippy-snip
 
IMG_20210103_152148.jpg
 
2021 is off to a great start ( archive ).

According to Ricardo Lara, California Insurance Commissioner, healthy breasts are now defined as "abnormal structures of the body caused by congenital defects" following the insurance language on double mastectomies for gender dysphoric females. Double mastectomies have also been reclassified from "cosmetic" to "reconstructive" to ensure no age limit for the procedure.

ins_1.jpg
ins_2.png

Source and summary.

As such, in an individual diagnosed with gender dysphoria, who is born with female characteristics and identifies as male, the presence of a female chest is an abnormal body structure caused by gender dysphoria...
EqxNWLYUcAA07zh.png


imagine.png

 
In a socialist society, transgender individuals would be rare because the underlying material basis (too lengthy and complicated to get into) for the phenomena we recognize as transgender individuals would cease to exist; those few that exist would be forcibly confined to psychiatric hospitals, given heavy doses of psychiatric drugs, and kept there until they recanted their delusional beliefs, as they should be.
 
In a socialist society, transgender individuals would be rare because the underlying material basis (too lengthy and complicated to get into) for the phenomena we recognize as transgender individuals would cease to exist; those few that exist would be forcibly confined to psychiatric hospitals, given heavy doses of psychiatric drugs, and kept there until they recanted their delusional beliefs, as they should be.
What about trans catgirls though? The USSR was full of em
 
It's also good to remember that most ancient marriages were not about love or even sexual desire, but about wealth, sharing labor, safety of union and having kids. This is why most marriages were not negotiated by the couple alone, but by the families as unit. Sure love marriage was seen as good thing, all cultures had stories about love and its wonders, but ultimately love doesn't bring food, land, animals or other material goods and without those there is significant possibility that you will die, starve or otherwise end up suffering. So most marriages were fairly practical, how the couple felt about each other being just one factor among others. Sure if you can get the perfect couple go for it but if not okey marriage is better no safety net for future. Generally as long as the couple could get along well enough, it was good enough and you probably will grow found of someone you share you life and bed with anyway. So someone being gay probably wasn't seen as an much of an issue when everyone knows that marriage and love aren't the same thing. As long as he can perform to get the next generation, who cares if the husband has preference towards the dick.

I've done quite a lot of (layman) research into homosexuality in historical times, particularly Georgian and Victorian era England, and you're right in part that a man's market value as a husband was not necessarily irreparably damaged by rumors of him being a "sodomite" (or an invert, as the Victorians said) but that was assuming he didn't do anything that would invite public scrutiny. These societies were notoriously two-faced; you were expected to present a chaste, pious front for public affairs but in private especially the higher classes would tolerate a surprising amount of deviancy.

For example, if two aristocrat youths were caught having an affair, their fathers would typically end it by separating them, often by sending by sending one of them to military academy or to receive "tutelage" by a relative far away. It was frowned upon, sure, but your life wasn't over, like some of today's LGBT activists like to say.

That is to say, women did not have this luxury. The idea of a woman having sexual agency independently from man was an incredibly scary thought to these people, and even the smallest hint of "loose behavior" could forever ruin a woman's reputation and her chances of scoring a good match on the marriage market. There wasn't even a word for a female homosexual prior to the first half of the 20th century. The only term was "whore". An oversexed woman who pursued other women for sex was surely to do it with men too and could not be trusted. Being outed as a cuckold in these times was in many ways worse than being outed as an invert.
 
I didn't watch much of this, but for some reason, this granny tranny made me laugh. It's
mostly because of the voice, and the recurring phrase: "all that
good stuff". The vid is nine years old, so this "granny" might be dead.
The Youtube channel itself is fucking weird ...might be some Thailand clinic
or something. Anyways, it kinda reminded me of Dame Edna.
 
One of the ways doctor shopping works (or worked -- or works, where I live) is that once one gullible 85 year old croaker prescribes the first scrip, which can be a challenge, from that point on, all judgment and discretion goes out the window as it is just assumed that due diligence has been done. Why do I assume a semi-analogous situation here when a kid on puberty blocker goes to see a psych?
You can just start self-medicating with estrogen and doctors are supposed to give you an actual prescription for it for purposes of harm reduction. According to all the guidelines I've seen. Somehow it does not seem like troons have figured this out yet.
 
T
For the appalling hate crime of a single positive word about the Great Witch-Monster, JK ‘Cersei’ Rowling, those rabid little TRA fucks will instantly spew out more hatred for one of their own dear trans sisters than the entire Twitterverse of terfs has done for all of them put together in the last 12 months.

You were right, @Wallace - they really are a complete bunch of cults.
 
I
T

For the appalling hate crime of a single positive word about the Great Witch-Monster, JK ‘Cersei’ Rowling, those rabid little TRA fucks will instantly spew out more hatred for one of their own dear trans sisters than the entire Twitterverse of terfs has done for all of them put together in the last 12 months.

You were right, @Wallace - they really are a complete bunch of cults.
just checkout Eddie on YouTube and bitch is doing a HUGE charity run. 31 marathons in 31 days followed by 31 comedy shows for charity. Doing pretty well near as I can tell. But he had an opinion differing from the accepted trans opinion so Nope. Still an asshole to them.

near as I can tell they’re a stand up person.
jenner is an asshole though. So I’ll give em that.
 
I

just checkout Eddie on YouTube and bitch is doing a HUGE charity run. 31 marathons in 31 days followed by 31 comedy shows for charity. Doing pretty well near as I can tell. But he had an opinion differing from the accepted trans opinion so Nope. Still an asshole to them.

near as I can tell they’re a stand up person.
jenner is an asshole though. So I’ll give em that.
Personally I’m meh about Izzard. I had more admiration for him decades ago, when his line was more of a Grayson Perry-ish ‘I’m just an ordinary man who likes wearing women’s clothes from time to time’. The recent pronoun-nouncement reeks a bit too much of cheap pungent Eau de Sam Smith. But I still wouldn’t rush to shit in his mouth just because he likes someone I don’t approve of. The Troon-fanatics’ mass mob hatred for JKR is a sick and dangerous thing, and the blue-ticks, media and assorted orgs who are glibly falling in with it are only going to wake the fuck up when those nutters have shed blood for their ~righteous fatwa~.

And they will.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole