- Dołączono
- 27 Gru 2020
I already have it archived on page 4 (with a text copy).Here's an archive of the reddit post, posting some of the interesting bits: (Archive/Wayback).
Wyświetl załącznik 1825604Wyświetl załącznik 1825605Wyświetl załącznik 1825606Wyświetl załącznik 1825610
Wyświetl załącznik 1825612Wyświetl załącznik 1825613
Clayton's doxed someone before?
Wyświetl załącznik 1825618
Wyświetl załącznik 1825619
Claytons Dms with Generic are on 1st page on Nulls post and they’re cited in the dox themselves. (Just letting you know to avoid double posting).
If you have the link attachments in the dox still working it would be a good idea to mirror them specifically. I’ll try and do it later when I have more time.
Oh and the dox also shows evidence that dream has doxed before as well as saying that Dream acting ‘undoxable’ was a challenge to them. He gets what he deserves. If you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
It really says a lot when you have to pay an Astrophysicist that won’t even give you his name just to drop your chances to the low low number of 100,000,000 by directly trying to state that real world statistics are biased (no shit) but then trying to misapply concepts.He (Dream) already edited drop rates to get a world record placement run (and would've been the world record at the time if another ender pearl spawned in the portal). He then hired a "PhD Astrophysicist" to write a report on how his odds are only 1 in 100 million of the event happening (with poor math, errors and typos in the report, if he is a PhD its not from an accredited University or College). Everything he says is automatically wrong unless he (Dream) provides hard and varifiable evidence.
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora: