Ethan Ralph's December 16th, 2020 Revenge Porn Arrest & Trial - Trial outcome: Ralph pled No Contest, was found guilty and has a 1yr suspended sentence (not probation).

[AnOminous]

Obviously someone other than the person sending the revenge porn has to receive it for anyone other than the sender to know about it, but that's not required by the statute. I think there is a colorable argument that the crime had been completed as soon as Ralph uploaded the video to the streamable link, even though nobody but Ralph had seen it before he sent the link to the halfwaycuck.

I'd argue "dissemination" requires at least one recipient actually seeing it, but it's an academic issue since it was sent, and received, and subsequently, ended up all over the Internet.

Would a superseding indictment add more charges onto this already existing case? If so but it doesn't happen, do you think there's any chance they'd ever charge him on the Faith choke by opening a new and different criminal case on him further down the line?

Maybe. We don't even know that happened though. If it didn't maybe that's why Faith didn't try to get him prosecuted for it.

 

[CORRUPT🍀]

Vickers was waiting in the wings to sink the gunt on revenge porn. The trouble with these things is that they can get you quite a while later. He's fucked imo. It's a fact he released that video. Ralph on ralph violence.

 

[AltisticRight]

I'd argue "dissemination" requires at least one recipient actually seeing it, but it's an academic issue since it was sent, and received, and subsequently, ended up all over the Internet.

So here's how it went...
halfwaycuck/Chris Kerr was doing a stream shitting on the gunt, says they never had sex (maximum cope)
The gunt sent him a streamable link, containing the sex tape, halfwaycuck opens it
"It was just pornhub" he says (maximum^2 cope)

Pretty clear cut case from my non-lawfag brain.

In the hostage tape, Faith said she consented to the filming of the porn, refers back to your earlier post. Would filming without consent and then dissemination of said porn be a felony then? Wew, dodged some bullets there gunty.

Maybe she didn't even consent to the porn being filmed, the gunt simply manipulated her into making that hostage tape, and she was under the delusion that her family will thus leave her alone...

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

What he can argue is that he didn't intend to distribute as it was sent in the DM's of a halfwaycrook. I dunno what the law is on that but it'd be weak as sending revenge porn to someones family and not posting it publicly will still rule against you. Government incompetence will have to save Ralph and luckily, that's looking strong and he may be able to claim all kinds of "it wasn't me I was super hacked" shit and the DA will be too lazy and dumb to verify if it was him.

The Virginia law on Revenge Porn, from what I read, doesn't actually require you to intend to disseminate to a wider audience.

The points the court have to prove are basically threefold:

1) That you have not been given permission to release the video in question.

2) The video includes another person in a sexual position, or state of undress.

3) You have used the video in order to harass, coerce or intimidate someone (doesn't have to be the person in the video.)

Plus, I doubt that they will be so incompetent, the DA would only need to subpoena Instagram and Facebook to look at Ralph's messages. This is pretty standard and would be easy to justify as it would be to confirm the validity of the messages to Chris Kerr etc.

His only real defense is going to be arguing she consented to it, but Ralph being a fat retard had put out a different story: that he never released it. This is what Faith meant when she said he didn't release revenge porn, she was agreeing with Ralph. So a competent prosecution would ask why did Ralph deny releasing it when he allegedly had permission from Faith to release it anyway?

The answer is that he didn't have permission, he just convinced Faith it wasn't him that released it. The change in story confirms his guilt.

 

[TriggerMeElmo]

The Virginia law on Revenge Porn, from what I read, doesn't actually require you to intend to disseminate to a wider audience.

The points the court have to prove are basically threefold:

1) That you have not been given permission to release the video in question.

2) The video includes another person in a sexual position, or state of undress.

3) You have used the video in order to harass, coerce or intimidate someone (doesn't have to be the person in the video.)

Plus, I doubt that they will be so incompetent, the DA would only need to subpoena Instagram and Facebook to look at Ralph's messages. This is pretty standard and would be easy to justify as it would be to confirm the validity of the messages to Chris Kerr etc.

His only real defense is going to be arguing she consented to it, but Ralph being a fat retard had put out a different story: that he never released it. This is what Faith meant when she said he didn't release revenge porn, she was agreeing with Ralph. So a competent prosecution would ask why did Ralph deny releasing it when he allegedly had permission from Faith to release it anyway?

The answer is that he didn't have permission, he just convinced Faith it wasn't him that released it. The change in story confirms his guilt.

Couldn't you argue some form of coercion anyway?

 

[RichardRApe]

Couldn't you argue some form of coercion anyway?

Why would they if it's not needed?

 

[TriggerMeElmo]

Why would they if it's not needed?

You're not wrong, I just thought it'd be more damning evidence considering that YT video she posted where it sounded like she was being held at guntpoint.

 

[Barbarus]

Why would anyone believe a furry degenerate like wolfpup? Let alone a furry degenerate who was up until recently on very good terms with ralph, even as much as meeting him irl and enjoying hanging with him?

Feels like bullshit, smells like bullshit, its probably bullshit.

 

[RichardRApe]

You're not wrong, I just thought it'd be more damning evidence considering that YT video she posted where it sounded like she was being held at guntpoint.

I could be wrong but I don't even think the DA will need to prove anything since the law doesn't seem to me like it requires that. They'd have to charge him with something else if they want to go that route is how I'm seeing it. Lawfags jump in please.

 

[TaterFarmer]

3) You have used the video in order to harass, coerce or intimidate someone (doesn't have to be the person in the video.)

Just what is their phone number? I'm still having flash backs from that crime against humanity. I'm going to call and file a complaint too. It's clear that Ralph intended to harass myself, a poor farmer, and intimidate me from fully pursuing my farming passions. I'm not sure that I could ever click on a streamable link again. I'm literally shaking as I write this! (okay, that's from laughing at myself... but, I'm still shaking! ) RE-E-E-E-E-E-E-E!!!!!

Feels like bullshit, smells like bullshit, its probably bullshit.

We need a brave volunteer thumb to give this the ol' taste test to know for sure.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

All these dudes gossiping about one another and calling it “friendship” is fucking womanly as hell.

 

[Fully Eshay Skits Bruh v2]

All these dudes gossiping about one another and calling it “friendship” is fucking womanly as hell.

Just like the farms <3

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Just like the farms <3

We’re not friends.

 

[TaterFarmer]

We’re not friends.

Okay, Jim. We are a community of agriculture enthusiasts joined in communion and friendship under the protective embrace of daddy Nool to whom we pledge undying love, loyalty, and lols. When you finally relax and allow the curds to fall from your eyes, you too will understand The Whey.

 

[AnOminous]

In the hostage tape, Faith said she consented to the filming of the porn, refers back to your earlier post. Would filming without consent and then dissemination of said porn be a felony then? Wew, dodged some bullets there gunty.

No, just two class 1 misdemeanors, unless she were under the age of 18 and didn't consent, then it would be a class 6 felony and a class 1 misdemeanor.

 

[TriggerMeElmo]

Either way this dude is getting his shirt and shoes stolen in jail for being a bitch ass nigga.

 

[Zeva_Adom]

Invite me too

 

[Ketamine Kat]

Either way this dude is getting his shirt and shoes stolen in jail for being a bitch ass nigga.

I can already hear them tapping the bottom of those kool-aid pouches to put some on his lips.

They're gonna use that shirt to pitch a tent in their cells.

 

[RazorBackBacon]

Okay, Jim. We are a community of agriculture enthusiasts joined in communion and friendship under the protective embrace of daddy Nool to whom we pledge undying love, loyalty, and lols. When you finally relax and allow the curds to fall from your eyes, you too will understand The Whey.

We're not friends, Null's a faggot and so are you.

 

[Crystal Golem]

Why would anyone believe a furry degenerate like wolfpup? Let alone a furry degenerate who was up until recently on very good terms with ralph, even as much as meeting him irl and enjoying hanging with him?

Feels like bullshit, smells like bullshit, its probably bullshit.

I doubt REEEthan would even let him do an interview like that and he would probably blow up his phone and tell him to stop if he did it on his own. And let's be honest I don't think wolfpup has too many of his own ideas