📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Whats with all of the insistence on fucking troons lately? What ever happend to being able to say no for whatever reason, without getting harrassed?

Thank you for posting this, shit is fucking hilarious, and things like these are the reason this is my favorite thread on the site. Its mind boggling to me that people could openly beg for things on the internet, and it gets even weirder when you see people actually obliging these childish requests. "Give me nintendy switch :(" :story: . Obvious children aside, do these people have no shame? I don't know why I even ask because this comes from the same group of men and women who unironically demand sex from people, and feel entitled not only to their time but bodies.

They react to being told "no" the same way an incel would. Because deep down, they are incels.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1785715

Isn't this just a workshop for rape? Learning psychological tactics to get a lesbian/queer woman to have sex with them or force because you've taken this workshop and they must want you, they just don't know it.

This just blows my mind, I'd heard the phrase before but didn't know what it meant. Not sure if I want to know. Too late now. I think I'm going to be sick. 🤢
So these guys are just pick-up artists with dresses on. Groovy.
 
Reparations in social situations doesn't cure anything. After a full blown war reparations do help - the country can rebuild. These blacks and alphabet people don't understand that this MONEY won't bring life long relief from "oppression"

Either this generation/kinds of people are just so narcissistic they want the power trip of taking cash for no reason. OR they are materialistic/so dense and cash brings them happiness...

Money will bring you a little bit of joy for a bit... it's quite a novelty. The easiest way to get a bit of happiness is to turn off the fucking iPhone, PC and TV and go outside for a stroll... it's a bit of paradise, even in the shittest places. African-Americans and troons go watch the sunset - you might have an epiphany and finally shut the fuck up.
They want the cake and eat it too. They know full well the money won't solve shit they just want free cash they will spend it on a bullshit 4k TV and continue yelling victim on Twitter. Non of them want to be seen as normal people they won't be able to complain anymore and it's the only reason they exist.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1785715

Isn't this just a workshop for rape? Learning psychological tactics to get a lesbian/queer woman to have sex with them or force because you've taken this workshop and they must want you, they just don't know it.

This just blows my mind, I'd heard the phrase before but didn't know what it meant. Not sure if I want to know. Too late now. I think I'm going to be sick. 🤢
When guys do this with single men they show up in hundreds to protest the rape culture but yeah trick for trannies to trick woman into sex it's fiiiiine
 
Wait, are there pick-up classes for women to try and trick men into having sex with them? Cause that’s hilarious.
Oh course there are. Only when men want to learn how to date more effectively they are rapists. Anyway those dating classes are stupid they show you how to not be yourself to find a girl and when you hook one and be yourself again they leave you lol.
 
Oh course there are. Only when men want to learn how to date more effectively they are rapists. Anyway those dating classes are stupid they show you how to not be yourself to find a girl and when you hook one and be yourself again they leave you lol.
I mean pick up classes and “how do I date” classes are pretty different things. I laugh at the idea of a pick up course for women because I imagine it’s just a cat fishing lesson, which you can honestly puzzle together for free on YouTube if the feeling catches ya.
 
All this talk about embryo selection, editing etc. reminds me of something insane I read recently from EssenceOfThought, an Atheist/"Skeptic" YouTuber who is the living embodiment of why bullies are a social good. One of those twerpy little autists who found a niche in dunking on retards who hold undefended positions like astrology being predictive or the earth being 6000 years old. Consequently, he developed the unfortunate condition known as Internet Skeptic Syndrome wherein you (a) become incapable of conceiving that you might be both wrong and retarded and (b) develop the delusion that cherry-picked "scientific" papers constitute unimpeachable evidence.

Anyways, he released a video wherein he makes a bunch of more or less nonsense claims, pretty standard stuff:
Wyświetl załącznik 1785795
Note how he almost perfectly inverts the probable reality; gender identity is biological & innate [citation needed] according to him and yet he believes that all the gender expression stuff is all "socially enforced". Baffling. Particularly since the latter point is pretty well established and not really disputed by troonists either. So, he has managed to settle on the most retarded of all possible positions that you could take.

The real pisser is this though:
Wyświetl załącznik 1785799
"targetted abortion of queer fetusues" :story::story:

Source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CxigSCxYccTZhRTi1fubvUjPStgKGc_Gsmha9N6UlsY/edit
Video link is in the google doc as well but don't watch it, you'll just get mad because the guy sounds like the biggest loser.
Writing so much and saying so little, three fucking paragraphs of linguistic confussion, of sofistic nonsense.
This mouthbreather should become a politician or a lawyer like Hontrapoints' gf (male).
 
What do you think the trans progressive of today media will be viewed back in the case of future where trans activism fad has died down - and it come to be seen as another "medical horror of the day" like lobotomy was? And do you think the woke media today will be seen through the lenses of propaganda and censorship?

Perhaps , I guess it is unlikely in the near future for this to happen because TRA is going strong and all the narratives have been rewritten to support the orthodoxy.. but I still hold up some hope that the tide will turn soon because gender identity doesn't really make sense. Our origin of gender and reasoning of transitions were initially developed as a form of covert eugenics/"play along and sterilise the mentally ill so they'll shut up" (Chris Jorgensen's case was pretty much one, Not sure if Wegener/Lili Elbe case came from a similar reasoning.) with also a hint of pedophilic nature in John Money studuea. Yet we're now selling it to people as the cure for bodily discomfort.

E.g. I'm thinking of Tlou2 and the character Lev, the story made it clear that she was going to be sold off as a child bride which no girls are going to like that, so she faked being a boy. But it was also written with the woke constraint that the character, and her voice actress should be seen as "true and honest men".

You can pretty much read any troon confessions as a result of gender roles giving them a hard time (or in some cases, fetish), but that kind of explanation other than having a gendered "authentic self" is a taboo now.

Are we going to be to frame troons as just a "product of its time"?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
What do you think the trans progressive of today media will be viewed back in the case of future where trans activism fad has died down - and it come to be seen as another "medical horror of the day" like lobotomy was? And do you think the woke media today will be seen through the lenses of propaganda and censorship?
I think the Bene Tleilax will look at the Pre-Bluterian medical records of the mythological monsters known as "trans people" and use them as inspiration for their fringe experiments, it will be shocking and disgusting, even using as metric the Tleilax "loose" moral standards.
 
What do you think the trans progressive of today media will be viewed back in the case of future where trans activism fad has died down - and it come to be seen as another "medical horror of the day" like lobotomy was? And do you think the woke media today will be seen through the lenses of propaganda and censorship?

Perhaps , I guess it is unlikely in the near future for this to happen because TRA is going strong and all the narratives have been rewritten to support the orthodoxy.. but I still hold up some hope that the tide will turn soon because gender identity doesn't really make sense. Our origin of gender and reasoning of transitions were initially developed as a form of covert eugenics/"play along and sterilise the mentally ill so they'll shut up" (Chris Jorgensen's case was pretty much one, Not sure if Wegener/Lili Elbe case came from a similar reasoning.) with also a hint of pedophilic nature in John Money studuea. Yet we're now selling it to people as the cure for bodily discomfort.

E.g. I'm thinking of Tlou2 and the character Lev, the story made it clear that she was going to be sold off as a child bride which no girls are going to like that, so she faked being a boy. But it was also written with the woke constraint that the character, and her voice actress should be seen as "true and honest men".

You can pretty much read any troon confessions as a result of gender roles giving them a hard time (or in some cases, fetish), but that kind of explanation other than having a gendered "authentic self" is a taboo now.

Are we going to be to frame troons as just a "product of its time"?
I think it will be framed that “society was so obsessed with gender roles that individuals felt that they must be a different sex if they didn’t fall into their natural gender’s roles”
 
For anyone, assuming you know, access to civilization, fitness and hygiene are controllable. Basic ugliness is not. Many of these men are fat and many have terrible hygiene. But if we control for that, the overwhelming majority are simply lacking in prettiness potential, as many women are. That doesn’t mean they can’t get someone to throw them some dick, but you know as well as I do that that is not challenging and does not in any way mean you are pretty. And considering how much one’s life improves when one is pretty...ugly women would be pursuing it, were it achievable. And since many more women are going to be close to but not quite pretty than these guys are it would take much less $$. If a woman who is 50% away from hotness can’t be carved into that state, how can a man who is 75-100% away?
Ok femcel.
20201212_044209.jpg
Lol, this idiot actually thinks this will somehow be possible any day now. How ever will the terfs cope?!
Aesthetic chromosomes? Self-configured babies? Excuse me, what in the actual fuck u/RebelliousGeorge likes to smoke.
The finest bath salts it seems.
 
Law Lets Female Rape Victims Select Female Forensic Examiners; Trans Activists React With Outrage | Women Are Human.


“Resisters United expressed bewilderment at transgender advocates’ reaction: “I kid you not – they are kicking off about not being able to examine rape victims. Twitter is full of screaming angry tweets about ‘their rights.’ Some are declaring not being able to examine a rape victim makes them ‘feel unsafe.’”

This makes me so MATI that I'm going to guy buy my own tophat and fucking eat it, because I just don't know what to do with the rage at this point. The audacity of telling a rape victim she cannot say no to who has access to her body, after she's already been violated!
 
Troonism, at its core, has two basic premises, both of which are extreme but not entirely insane.
1) Gender is an artificial concept that only exists due to social enforcement (radical conclusion: gender is meaningless)
2) Gender is an innate and immutable part of a person's sense of self (radical conclusion: gender is one of the most important parts of your identity)

Both of these can be true to a degree and you don't need to reach the radical conclusion. Personally I believe that some aspects of what we consider gender are artificial concepts that only exist due to social enforcement, stuff like color preferences and clothing; I believe that some aspects of what we consider gender are hard-wired at birth, stuff like modes of sexual attraction or kinesthetics. The first premise is generally a progressive idea while the second is conservative and I'd say that the vast, vast majority of people are somewhere in the middle. I'm personally a little more invested in the first and I think that it's the more defensible one, it's definitely the more popular position in the progressive circles where I hang out and it's the one that appeals the most to handmaidens.

The issue is that trannies, depending on what they want at the moment, go 100% in either one. The first argument is the motte and the second is the bailey. #1 is used to defend actual trans rights and #2 is used to force everyone to play along. For example, radical feminists tend to lean heavily for #1 and don't have any problems with men defying socially constructed gender norms like clothing or hobbies. But they also think that men in general are socialized to be oppressive (some of them also hold some #2 beliefs about men naturally being aggressive, but that's not relevant here) and should not be in women's spaces that are intended specifically for women to be free from oppressive gender dynamics and that men would fuck that up and they don't even need these spaces*.
Even if you're a TWAW evangelist, it's undeniable that TiMs are socialized as males and don't face the same issues as women, at least it's undeniable if you're remotely sane, so a #1 argument just won't work here. But suddenly #2! Keeping TiMs out of women's spaces invalidates their core gender identity and that's not just some social construct, it's a core part of their personality and by denying it you're denying their right to exist. And then when handmaidens peek in on the TiM radfem fight they get told that these radfems are the ones who think that gender has a meaning and since they refuse the radical conclusion of #1 then clearly they are adherents of #2. To someone who hasn't (or won't) spent much time actually thinking about this stuff that seems like a reasonable enough argument.

Some clearly non-threatening trannies who were obviously being oppressed by patriarchal gender dynamics were exceptions. These exceptions ended up being the first step on a slippery slope and now radomes are probably less willing to make these exceptions in the future
I broadly agree with most this, your framing is similar to what I wrote here in many more words.

I think everyone agrees that much of what we call gender expression consists in superficial things that are effectively purely cultural; stockings & dresses are for girls, pink-blue etc. However, there are statistical differences in deeper parts of our psychology, some of which do directly give rise to gendered behavior, think penchant for play-fighting, the people-things dichotomy. Other differences in elements of our psyche like our processing of emotions, motivations and sexual attractions give rise to significant differences but the specific form these differences take are contingent on society itself. That is to say, there are things that will be gendered in our society not so much because they are 'innately' gendered but because of their role or significance in our society. The tendency for men to dominate almost every pursuit that is considered to be high status is a good example of this phenomenon.

Of course, nothing in the world acts alone and culture interacts in a dialectal fashion with differences in innate instinct, instincts shape culture and limit the possible forms it can take while culture channels instincts both to narrow instinctual differences or widen them depending on the case.


I don't think that #2 is conservative though, "gender identity" as a concrete thing is really just a troon notion. The conservative view is to deny both premises. Gender is not "artificial" but an inevitable emergent phenomenon due to sex-differences, a conservative would further make the judgement that this is also a good thing. Hence, that attempts to attenuate it are damaging to both society and generally to those seeking to defy its strictures as well.

As I see it - and as you've identified - #2 is just a reverse-engineered notion to achieve particular goals and in particular the goals of the modal troon; the AGP-esque male. The really key part of this fixation on 'identity' is that it is essentially a carte blanche. It abjures them of providing any form of testable justification (asking questions is transphobic, you see) while simultaneously elevating the acceptance of their claims to the level of an imperative.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1784499
Lol, this idiot actually thinks this will somehow be possible any day now. How ever will the terfs cope?!

Wyświetl załącznik 1784504
I love that ever since they took away senpai bigpapi's subreddit, he's been going on the troon subs to speak the truth. Godspeed, bigpapi. :semperfidelis:
If human has advanced to the point that we can change sex at will, gender won't matter anymore. Anyone can be whatever they want and there will be no such thing as "transgender" too. I feel like the easiest way to do this is finding a way to grow human into adult form quickly and transplant you brain into the new body. So it's not just sex, you can look like anyone.

The reason we have trans category because our medical technology right now can't really change sex.

I've come across Rebellious George a lot of time actually, he seems to be a truscum. But as we know, they're still as insane as trenders and creeps, even if they seem sane at first sight.
 
Aesthetic chromosomes? Self-configured babies? Excuse me, what in the actual fuck u/RebelliousGeorge likes to smoke.
The finest bath salts it seems.
Created my first kiwifarms account to talk about this retard. He posts on a sub I used to use a lot. He was a pickup artist type MRA. The kind who complains about how he can't get a girlfriend because feminism. Guess he trooned out

Edit: try sorting tranny selfie subreddits by controversial. they get more bad

59st7k59n6r51.jpg

Edit 2: im idiot who added webp files not images
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole