2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[FunPosting101]

If the Michigan audit was dropped and then the results were certified because of threats to the politicians involved, that is not going to look good for the defense when this goes to the courts.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

Didn’t they also do that with Trump at his COVID conference when he didn’t specify which administration will be sworn in next

They do it all the fucking time. If you've studied any degree (university or technical college doesn't matter) related to a STEM field you HAVE seen this before. For the uninitiated, first the more entertaining version:

And an extra bit of explanation that is less fun to parse through:

I assure you. If you knew how the media reports any and all supposedly scientific facts, you'd see. Even on shit they have no reason to lie. Even on the most ludicrously benign bullshit. The media LIES. It does it constanty and relentlessly on absolutely everything and if you know how to check about the sources and care about the story, you will spot it. It's as tiring as it is horrifying.

For those wondering why the media would lie on even benign inocuous things and starting to get the 1984 tinfoil. Don't. It's often unintentional. Here's the thing, and this is something you'll have to learn about if you care about the scientific method:

Telling the truth isn't as easy as just stating things you consider to be true. To ensure honesty a scientist needs to be willing to change his mind if faced with evidence against his position, and he needs to check his evidence before publishing.

The media doesn't do this. They never double check their bullshit, they never try to stay honest and they sure as shit never change their position based on evidence, only narrative.

Because of this, a journalist quite simply can be considered to always be lying, even when they tell the truth. Because the journalist is never aware if what he's saying is true or not, he has no fucking clue because he never bothered to check to begin with. That's why even when they genuinely don't want to convey false information they still manage to fuck it up. Because they edit the source to make it more comfortable to read, simpler or more authoritative, and they don't realice the way they're editing it fucks up the actual meaning of what is being said. They don't want to lie, but they never actually tried to avoid doing so, so they do it anyway, because they're idiots.

And yes, it does drive the actual scientists insane. When I said if you've studied STEM you are aware of this, it's because they're literally teaching, on all STEM degrees, at least 1 month of "how to deal with journalists", (obviously not literally named that, but the name isn't standard and for all intents and purposes it is that), a course where they teach you what the media does, how they do it, and how to essentially try to adapt your information in ways where you trick the interviewer into telling the truth. For example, in journalism they teach the students to act as if they were morons when they understand what you're saying but think they can't edit it in ways that makes it "good for the audience", because subconsciously that'll make the interviewed person repeat the information in simpler and usually oversimplified ways, which for them it's good because they care more about narrative than they care about information. So now they're teaching us that journalists do this and to have prepared a syntaxis that doesn't oversimplify beforehand and start with one we know is more obtuse, so they'll be happy with the second which they wouldn't actually be without the first, more obtuse version. It's like the arms race of weaponized autism, academia and the media are literally currently engaged some kinda retarded narrative cold war because journalists are by nature completely dishonest. It's infuriating and hilarious in equal measure.

 

[TheSimpShow]

Agreed, for some reason bringing back the troops has pissed off a lot of establishment types for some reason.

I I I wonder wonder wonder why why why

If the Michigan audit was dropped and then the results were certified because of threats to the politicians involved, that is not going to look good for the defense when this goes to the courts.

Yeah just like that time Hillary was on trial for Benghazi! Man that sure was something of a telling off! Wowzer she won't do that again in a hurry.

They do it all the fucking time. If you've studied any degree (university or technical college doesn't matter) related to a STEM field you HAVE seen this before. For the uninitiated, first the more entertaining version:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=07NMglQX6gE
And an extra bit of explanation that is less fun to parse through:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LdnZ1l5TxJk
I assure you. If you knew how the media reports any and all supposedly scientific facts, you'd see. Even on shit they have no reason to lie. Even on the most ludicrously benign bullshit. The media LIES. It does it constanty and relentlessly on absolutely everything and if you know how to check about the sources and care about the story, you will spot it. It's as tiring as it is horrifying.

For those wondering why the media would lie on even benign inocuous things and starting to get the 1984 tinfoil. Don't. It's often unintentional. Here's the thing, and this is something you'll have to learn about if you care about the scientific method:

Telling the truth isn't as easy as just stating things you consider to be true. To ensure honesty a scientist needs to be willing to change his mind if faced with evidence against his position, and he needs to check his evidence before publishing.

The media doesn't do this. They never double check their bullshit, they never try to stay honest and they sure as shit never change their position based on evidence, only narrative.

Because of this, a journalist quite simply can be considered to always be lying, even when they tell the truth. Because the journalist is never aware if what he's saying is true or not, he has no fucking clue because he never bothered to check to begin with. That's why even when they genuinely don't want to convey false information they still manage to fuck it up. Because they edit the source to make it more comfortable to read, simpler or more authoritative, and they don't realice the way they're editing it fucks up the actual meaning of what is being said. They don't want to lie, but they never actually tried to avoid doing so, so they do it anyway, because they're idiots.

And yes, it does drive the actual scientists insane. When I said if you've studied STEM you are aware of this, it's because they're literally teaching, on all STEM degrees, at least 1 month of "how to deal with journalists", (obviously not literally named that, but the name isn't standard and for all intents and purposes it is that), a course where they teach you what the media does, how they do it, and how to essentially try to adapt your information in ways where you trick the interviewer into telling the truth. For example, in journalism they teach the students to act as if they were morons when they understand what you're saying but think they can't edit it in ways that makes it "good for the audience", because subconsciously that'll make the interviewed person repeat the information in simpler and usually oversimplified ways, which for them it's good because they care more about narrative than they care about information. So now they're teaching us that journalists do this and to have prepared a syntaxis that doesn't oversimplify beforehand and start with one we know is more obtuse, so they'll be happy with the second which they wouldn't actually be without the first, more obtuse version. It's like the arms race of weaponized autism, academia and the media are literally currently engaged some kinda retarded narrative cold war because journalists are by nature completely dishonest. It's infuriating and hilarious in equal measure.

This nibba is my man, he's my nibba

 

[Doctor of Autism]

They do it all the fucking time. If you've studied any degree (university or technical college doesn't matter) related to a STEM field you HAVE seen this before. For the uninitiated, first the more entertaining version:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=07NMglQX6gE
And an extra bit of explanation that is less fun to parse through:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LdnZ1l5TxJk
I assure you. If you knew how the media reports any and all supposedly scientific facts, you'd see. Even on shit they have no reason to lie. Even on the most ludicrously benign bullshit. The media LIES. It does it constanty and relentlessly on absolutely everything and if you know how to check about the sources and care about the story, you will spot it. It's as tiring as it is horrifying.

For those wondering why the media would lie on even benign inocuous things and starting to get the 1984 tinfoil. Don't. It's often unintentional. Here's the thing, and this is something you'll have to learn about if you care about the scientific method:

Telling the truth isn't as easy as just stating things you consider to be true. To ensure honesty a scientist needs to be willing to change his mind if faced with evidence against his position, and he needs to check his evidence before publishing.

The media doesn't do this. They never double check their bullshit, they never try to stay honest and they sure as shit never change their position based on evidence, only narrative.

Because of this, a journalist quite simply can be considered to always be lying, even when they tell the truth. Because the journalist is never aware if what he's saying is true or not, he has no fucking clue because he never bothered to check to begin with. That's why even when they genuinely don't want to convey false information they still manage to fuck it up. Because they edit the source to make it more comfortable to read, simpler or more authoritative, and they don't realice the way they're editing it fucks up the actual meaning of what is being said. They don't want to lie, but they never actually tried to avoid doing so, so they do it anyway, because they're idiots.

And yes, it does drive the actual scientists insane. When I said if you've studied STEM you are aware of this, it's because they're literally teaching, on all STEM degrees, at least 1 month of "how to deal with journalists", (obviously not literally named that, but the name isn't standard and for all intents and purposes it is that), a course where they teach you what the media does, how they do it, and how to essentially try to adapt your information in ways where you trick the interviewer into telling the truth. For example, in journalism they teach the students to act as if they were morons when they understand what you're saying but think they can't edit it in ways that makes it "good for the audience", because subconsciously that'll make the interviewed person repeat the information in simpler and usually oversimplified ways, which for them it's good because they care more about narrative than they care about information. So now they're teaching us that journalists do this and to have prepared a syntaxis that doesn't oversimplify beforehand and start with one we know is more obtuse, so they'll be happy with the second which they wouldn't actually be without the first, more obtuse version. It's like the arms race of weaponized autism, academia and the media are literally currently engaged some kinda retarded narrative cold war because journalists are by nature completely dishonest. It's infuriating and hilarious in equal measure.

So what’s your take on how the media is currently covering this, it sounds like you have a lot of insight into this.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

First they came for the neo-Nazis and I said nothing, because I'm not a Nazi.

Then they came for the police and I said nothing, because I'm not a cop.

Then they came for business owners and I said nothing, because I don't own a business.

Then they came for Trump supporters and I said nothing, because I'm afraid.

Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.

 

[Buttigieg2020]

Wyświetl załącznik 1735473

The immediate proof that things aren’t that bad is that this happened over 12 hours ago, and nobody noticed until now. If it was the definitive break they wanted, it would be plastered on everything nonstop.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Yeah I get that but if it was for that, wouldn't it make more sense to do it after December 14th so it's more fresh in their minds once it's done to Biden.

Oh, they are going to bring the 25th up again in about a month.

 

[Irritable Bowel Syndrome]

First they came for the neo-Nazis and I said nothing, because I'm not a Nazi.

Then they came for the police and I said nothing, because I'm not a cop.

Then they came for business owners and I said nothing, because I don't own a business.

Then they came for Trump supporters and I said nothing, because I'm afraid.

Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.

All of those groups are obsessed with protecting your enemies. Good riddance, they would never speak for you anyways.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

So what’s your take on how the media is currently covering this, it sounds like you have a lot of insight into this.

I really don't have that much insights. But I do know their tricks. They always edit. That's just 100%, they ALWAYS cut parts away or add supposed context that wasn't there, they always care more about the narrative than the truth and they sure as shit won't be reporting anything that hurts their predetermined goal. So basically what we've been seeing.

My only real point is: never trust what they say. Period. Which we've been saying from day 1. The Mitch thing just proves it more obviously. Mitch said the transition of power wouldn't be pushed back (meaning he's gonna be doing whatever happens once the time comes, he's just not taking sides openly) but their narrative is "Trump is loosing and the GOP will drag him out of the white house in chains" so they altered it to "Mitch says the transition (to biden) won't be pushed back", by adding onesided context not present in the actual event they're reporting. As the first video shows, they are willing an able to just straight up copy-paste audio to make you say shit you didn't. This btw is called the "Frankenbite" (as a reference to the sentence being a frankenstein's monster of other sentences). But in this case they just did it through context. It doesn't really matter how, in the end it's the same:

ALWAYS CHECK THE SOURCES. NEVER TRUST A JOURNALIST.

No, not even when he's on "your side", journalists aren't on anyone's side but their own. That is a lesson we've had to learn the hard way here in Spain.

Spoiler: tangential autism

For context on why I said that. I don't know how it is on the rest of the world, but here in Spain journalism has pretty much always been seen as a joke. This btw indeed comes from the times of Sagasta, our election fraud enforced "Uniparty" period, where the only ones doing the real reporting were the fucking satire writers while the actual journalists just licked the uniparty's ass. Since then it's pretty much common knowledge journalists are just shit.

But in the past this was more of a repeated joke, and while we did have all of this "here's how the media changes what you tell them" course, it was kinda... neutral. The lesson was that you can get in trouble for saying shit that turns out to be wrong, but the journalist only cares about their narrative, so do beware the tricks they use to alter what you say and try to work in ways that don't give them the chance to do stupid shit because if it turns out the way they edit it makes it wrong and they get caught they're throwing you under the bus. Basically, it was assumed that they were incompetent and sleazy, but malice was never truly inserted as a conclusion.

But then some years ago some pink press bitch went on to promote "the miracle enzime", a stupid ass fucking pseudoscientific "alternate medicine" book selling bullshit ass pills. And some biotech guy tried to correct her and the program just relentlessly reamed him with bullshit and tried to cancel him for it despite him being genuinely nice during the interview and simply trying to correct them politely. This was the turning point. 'Cause shit is, while journalists took both sides of the issue, their tactics were laid bare. Even those trying to give interviews to the "right" side of the issue had their interviews edited to push narrative bullshit in ways that muddied the playing field, because all the journalist cares about is having a higher audience, not telling the fucking truth. And both sides tried to get scientists canceled left and right (which btw, not happening here in spain, our labor law is pretty fucking heavy when it comes to public employees, and most scientists worth a damn here work for public universities, so no fucking way they're cancelling them even if the government wanted to, they'd have to change the law, and good luck changing that shit without getting canceled yourself by the unions. Not fucking happening), point is, BOTH SIDES WERE ACTIVELY TRYING TO THREATEN SCIENTISTS' LIVELIHOODS. So that's basically the point at which academia just collectively said "fuck this" and took their own side. It was very palpable through the rest of that year, the narrative changed from "journalists are idiots" to "journalists are evil" very quickly, that's why I say we learned that the hard way, it was very apparent how universities started to actively discriminate against journalists when it came to programs, funding, etc. Before we were trying to cooperate in some kinda "deal with the devil" situation because scientists thought they needed journos for outreach, after that it was all about how to transmit info through internet platforms, there were even tutorials on youtube channels and shit like that, hell a classmate of mine started one during that year and now has one that's got a small cult following (not saying who because a) it's in spanish and b) powerlevel) so yeah... It escalate pretty quickly after that.

But really the only important point is the one I keep hammering: ALWAYS CHECK THE SOURCES. THEY ARE PROBABLY EDITED TO HELL AND BACK ON THE ARTICLE.

 

[FunPosting101]

Yeah just like that time Hillary was on trial for Benghazi! Man that sure was something of a telling off! Wowzer she won't do that again in a hurry.

Actually this kind of blatant electoral fraud is not like Benghazi, and the idea that people being threatened into doing things they wouldn't have done otherwise will look good when this goes up the ole' legal chain is not something I consider to be realistic or believable. Don't misunderstand me, I am more than aware of all the ways this could still go wrong, but threatening elected officials and their families when so much is on the line(as in, the integrity of our elections in general, and the chances of the GOP ever getting elected again in particular)is not going to be dismissed or ignored by the people and groups it will negatively affect the most.

Oh, and I'm not saying anyone of importance to the DNC will be going to prison for this either, I am saying that Trump and the GOP are going to fight this thing in a way that the Benghazi scandal cover-up would not and realistically speaking could not be fought against.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Journalists lie on even benign inocuous things and starting to get the 1984 tinfoil. Don't. It's often unintentional.

It's just more brave new world than 1984.

A world where journalists don't care if it's true what they write.

It really isn't any less dystopian than one where they intentionally lie.

And let's not forget that journalists that do things like publish the panama papers or name the child traficking of political figures die mysteriously, while journalists that publish politician's emails get disappeared, like Assange.

There is a 1984-type reason why only cowardly and lying journalists remain.

 

[Random Internet Person]

Not here.

After these threats the Wayne Country Reps changed their votes. Utterly spineless.

https://archive.vn/J1f4m

And you wonder why a lot of local RINOs are caving in while most of the ones in the national or even state level aren't.

So, let's say that Michigan gets certified for Biden tomorrow:

Okay? So Trump can take this to the SCOTUS. There is clear evidence that Michigan has significantly more votes than voters ... And the state certifies it without a recount or an audit?

I get why the Republicans in Wayne County switched their votes; their children were literally being threatened (what would you do in that situation? I personally can't answer that because it's too scary to even think about being in that position). However, if this goes to the SCOTUS, then wouldn't everyone running things in the state be held accountable? Those Republicans are truly stuck between a rock and a hard place.

If Michigan is certified, then Trump has a lot to work with when it comes to the Supreme Court. Solid proof of extortion, threats, fraud ... Yup. I think that Trump has a good chance when bringing this one to the SCOTUS.

If this is the people Trump has to rely on in his corner, he's fucked with a capital F. Honestly, the only reason this goes on is because Trump cares too much about optics to just force in the Armed Forces and have them do every count in every state in controversy.

Well I guess one thing that needs to stop, is believing the usual boomer cuckservative talking point that liberals are weak or pussies. Ever since the China Virus invaded the land, everyone has seen the strength that liberals have. They have now managed to rig an election and apparently intimidating people into not questioning the election. And unless something major is done, they about to get away with a lot more. The liberal is the most dangerous political animal in the world right now because it has no sense of self preservation and morality.

They also believe themselves to have the moral high ground. And to a society where image and PR is everything, you know who to hedge your bets on.

Giving up would essentially mean resigning to a nihilistic, depressive life where we're begging for death to take us. It's a punishment worse than death. At that point, might as well die while fighting for your beliefs while you still have a shred of dignity.

Trump was never our savior. What he did do is provide a roadmap on who our enemies are. If we want to get rid of the swamp, that job falls on us. We can't topple the establishment individually, but exposing and holding their minions accountable wherever they are does weaken their cause.

Except when you realize what an uphill battle everything is, and how much everything is against you, how you only have yourself to rely on, and you have little if anything to work with, you realize the only real way to not have a life that ends in horrible failure is to just resign yourself to the motions. I mean, that's what Corona has done to a lot of people with these lockdowns. COrona is merely a dresss rehersal for the future if you're not down with the progressive utopia.

Individually they are weak. Problem is we let them have power. They rely upon some external power source to support them. Once you strip that away they collapse.

Conservatives just have to realize that liberals never operate in good faith.

Every Trump supporter has realized that. The average Joe hasn't and probably never will because they're not directly affected and we have yet to see cops come into people's houses in the US to make sure Corona procedures are being adhered to.

There is some weird shit going on currently, like why the fuck is everyone trying to invoke the 25th amendment, it's going to be a tedious process and Trump will be out in January anyway for them.

Because it's not enough for Trump to leave office. They have to see Trump have the position taken from him and see him being humiliated and leaving the public scene in disgrace before he begins a life on the run lest he ends up dead or imprisoned with everything he's earned seized and redistributed.

Yeah I remember some kid posting on the farms and people found their personal info right away which resulted in Null banning them before shit escalated.

It’s weird seeing Kiwi Farms have the moral high ground over supposed normie friendly sites

That's because KF doesn't play around in the field of "being the moral compass of society". True equality is hatred of everyone, and treating everyone like shit. Even yourself.

Now that Mitch has given up, how long until Trump concedes?

Wyświetl załącznik 1735473

Well I think it must’ve been bringing the troops home that probably caused him to break off, honestly Trumps chances are looking worse now it is even harder to tell what’s to come.

A bad idea considering they are 2 votes away from losing the senate. The Republicans are cucking already? Knowing there's a political hit list with their names on it?

Well, when people go on about lists and blackballing, and the only way off of the shitlist is turning on Trump, what real choices do you have when you have the gravy train rolling. When people say they hate you and want you dead and/or destitute, it's probably a good idea to assume they're telling the truth.

 

[Jarolleon]

Agreed, for some reason bringing back the troops has pissed off a lot of establishment types for some reason.

Maybe some of them are legitimately scared of Trump trying to pull a Caesar.. but it's probably because it'll disrupt their nation-building plans. The neocons probably see the forever wars as a type of routine maintenance work, retaining the global peace by nipping geopolitical issues in the bud. In their view Trump's isolationism results in geopolitical problems festering, and this has to be rectified ASAP, but now Trump as an added fuck you decides to misplace all their tools.

Of course once it's established that intervention can be done anything bad that happens on Earth is America's fault. Ethiopia is damming off Egypt's water, the blood of millions in the ensuing life-or-death struggle is on Trump's hands for not resolving the dispute (allegedly).

 

[Random Internet Person]

Maybe some of them are legitimately scared of Trump trying to pull a Caesar.. but it's probably because it'll disrupt their nation-building plans. The neocons probably see the forever wars as a type of routine maintenance work, retaining the global peace by nipping geopolitical issues in the bud. In their view trump's isolationism results in geopolitical problems festering, and this has to be rectified ASAP, but now Trump as an added fuck you decides to misplace all their tools.

I thought the complaint was people were tired of the US being the world's police force. Also, wouldn't the talk of nation building be seen by some as a precursor to making a NWO friendly government? I mean, given China, the EU, and all the Islamic groups aiming for a caliphate, the real question is what the NWO will look like.

 

[WeDon'tNeedToWhisper]

If Trump gets reelected it would be called a new administration which, in my opinion, is the same as Mitch saying "next administration".
It's considered a new administration I think mostly because many of the important leadership roles are replaced, for various reason.

This is very informative regarding presidential transitions
Link

Experienced federal leaders, policy experts and historians have long focused on the monumental challenges associated with forming a government after a new president is elected. One of the biggest hurdles involves making about 4,000 political appointments, including more than 1,200 that require Senate confirmation.

But second-term presidents also must focus on political appointments, and in particular be prepared for significant turnover in critical leadership jobs following their re-election.

An examination of about 60 important leadership positions— Cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries and undersecretaries at 15 major departments—shows that many were vacated at various points following a president’s re-election, either by choice or because the president wanted a change in leadership and fresh ideas.

The new data compiled by the Partnership for Public Service’s Center for Presidential Transition shows that from Election Day through the first six months of the second terms of Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, an average of 43% of their Cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries and undersecretaries left their jobs. On average, 9% left prior to Inauguration Day and 34% left during the first six months of the second term.

During this period between the election and the early months of the second term, five Cabinet secretaries left the Clinton administration, eight departed the Bush administration and seven left the Obama administration.

In total, 463 appointments across the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations were tracked

Few first-year appointees serve until the end of the administration

The vast majority of the high-level politically appointed jobs examined have been traditionally filled by presidents during their first year in office. However, presidents cannot expect those early appointees to serve deep into their administrations.

For the past three administrations, an average of only 11% of high-level appointees served until the end of the second term.

In fact, an average of 44% of individuals holding these jobs left office at various stages of the first terms of the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations. As a result, many of the earliest officials in these positions were no longer around to share their experiences in the second term.

The Partnership for Public Service and The Washington Post maintain a database of President Donald Trump’s appointments for more than 700 key positions. The database shows the number of appointees confirmed by the Senate, the progress of candidates as they go through the nomination and confirmation process, and the jobs for which there is a vacancy and no nominee. The appointee database is located at wapo.st/2JUQPi2.

Conclusion

The need for effective pre-election planning is acute for presidential
hopefuls because of the large number of political appointees and the extraordinary challenge associated with staffing an entirely new administration. Recent history also shows that one of the key challenges for a second-term administration is to prepare for significant turnover among the highest-level government positions.

Although a second term in many respects represents a continuation of the previous four years, it offers a chance for a recalibration and a new start that requires serious preparation long before Inauguration Day. Even though the likely turnover of key personnel presents a challenge for an incumbent administration, it also provides the opportunity for a president to bring in individuals with fresh ideas and new energy.

Some graphs I got from the same site

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another thing, I found this on twitter. These various levels of politicians, who have obvious TDS, yet hold so much power, truly frighten me. There's so many of them out there, even if you haven't seen them all, you KNOW they're there. Like a mouse or a rabbit: once you've seen one, you know there's a least a hundred more sneaking around. Except the number is actually far greater than that. Anyway! Here's that pos who scared/intimidated/threatened/etc. the two GOP into taking back their original vote and certifying MI

Ok, last thing.

It's been two weeks since election night. The election night that just ended out of nowhere, kept me up way too late because, surely, they'd have the results by the morning. No, they took a break, God forbid they work in shifts. and then I had to wait a whole week! week and a half? so they could count every single last Biden vote (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) because that all it was, votes for Biden. Trump sat at 214 for a week!! As Biden's blue line got closer and closer to 270 and then he surpasses it reaching 306(!!!) while Trump ends up at like, 232.

I was told ballots are still coming in, still being counted, red states are flipping blue and it's dragging out for what feels like forever then next thing I know Biden is in the office of president elect (lol), dems are demanding Trump concedes, they're harassing (that's putting it gently) this Emily lady who's only doing her job, talking about the 25th Amendment, demanding Trump is prosecuted (the irony) and the rest. It's infuriating because we've been waiting, patiently, but they want the Presidency NOW! NOW! NOW! hand it over. It's only been two weeks but they demand it and they're not getting it and boy are they fuming. Fuck them, fuck these delusional faggots all over twitter, I'm so fucking tired of being told that I'm a nazi, racist, transphobic, etc. and that my race should literally be exterminated while I watch the black race burn, loot, riot, murder with no repercussions.

Sorry for the long post.

 

[Random Internet Person]

If Trump gets reelected it would be called a new administration which, in my opinion, is the same as Mitch saying "next administration".
It's considered a new administration I think mostly because many of the important leadership roles are replaced, for various reason.

This is very informative regarding presidential transitions
Link


Some graphs I got from the same site

Wyświetl załącznik 1735576

Wyświetl załącznik 1735577

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another thing, I found this on twitter. These various levels of politicians, who have obvious TDS, yet hold so much power, truly frighten me. There's so many of them out there, even if you haven't seen them all, you KNOW they're there. Like a mouse or a rabbit: once you've seen one, you know there's a least a hundred more sneaking around. Except the number is actually far greater than that. Anyway! Here's that pos who scared/intimidated/threatened/etc. the two GOP into taking back their original vote and certifying MI


Wyświetl załącznik 1735582

Ok, last thing.

It's been two weeks since election night. The election night that just ended out of nowhere, kept me up way too late because, surely, they'd have the results by the morning. No, they took a break, God forbid they work in shifts. and then I had to wait a whole week! week and a half? so they could count every single last Biden vote (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) because that all it was, votes for Biden. Trump sat at 214 for a week!! As Biden's blue line got closer and closer to 270 and then he surpasses it reaching 306(!!!) while Trump ends up at like, 232.

I was told ballots are still coming in, still being counted, red states are flipping blue and it's dragging out for what feels like forever then next thing I know Biden is in the office of president elect (lol), dems are demanding Trump concedes, they're harassing (that's putting it gently) this Emily lady who's only doing her job, talking about the 25th Amendment, demanding Trump is prosecuted (the irony) and the rest. It's infuriating because we've been waiting, patiently, but they want the Presidency NOW! NOW! NOW! hand it over. It's only been two weeks but they demand it and they're not getting it and boy are they fuming. Fuck them, fuck these delusional faggots all over twitter, I'm so fucking tired of being told that I'm a nazi, racist, transphobic, etc. and that my race should literally be exterminated while I watch the black race burn, loot, riot, murder with no repercussions.

Sorry for the long post.

I can simplify this: It's over. Democrats are gloating, and now this Ned guy is patting himself on the back on how he destroyed the Trump menace and how the MAGA movement will be relegated to history's villains that can now be used as the traditional disposable stock villains in future movies. It's not a matter of if everything we love is destroyed and replaced by the 1619 curriculum and a country where the first POTUS was Barack Obama, but a matter of when if people are making tweets like this.

 

[alreadyhome]

Let the left demoralize themselves, as we all are waiting. Don't let them bring you down with them.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I can simplify this: It's over. Democrats are gloating, and now this Ned guy is patting himself on the back on how he destroyed the Trump menace and how the MAGA movement will be relegated to history's villains that can now be used as the traditional disposable stock villains in future movies. It's not a matter of if everything we love is destroyed and replaced by the 1619 curriculum and a country where the first POTUS was Barack Obama, but a matter of when if people are making tweets like this.

The goons and the true believers are celebrating. The media who wins either way is celebrating. The big name players are still dead fucking silent. Pelosi. Biden. Schumer. Romney. Once they start to either freak out or make public calls for Trump to give up, then maybe it's starting the last act.

Until then? They know something is up and are staying out of splatter range in case the shit hits the fan. Maybe we should start considering just what they know that's keeping them silent.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

I can simplify this: It's over. Democrats are gloating, and now this Ned guy is patting himself on the back on how he destroyed the Trump menace and how the MAGA movement will be relegated to history's villains that can now be used as the traditional disposable stock villains in future movies. It's not a matter of if everything we love is destroyed and replaced by the 1619 curriculum and a country where the first POTUS was Barack Obama, but a matter of when if people are making tweets like this.

No but for real. That ain't no indication of shite. I still recall the time where the fascists strut their feathers around here in similar ways (and I mean actual fascists, as in political groups that literally stated that if they gained enough support to get to the government they'd abolish democracy and reinstate the Regime. Yeah that was a thing they thought would happen back in the day... Sounds crazy, right? Well that's the point: )Where are they now? Well they've been relegated to doing stupid marches no one cares about and getting battoned by the cops they love so much when they get uppity enough. Biggest push they've had in ages was Vox trying to give them a platform and backlash amongst even right wingers was so high Vox proceeded to cull itself in response soon after.

Just 'cause authoritarian swamp creatures are strutting around like they're tough shit that ain't mean nothing. They're idiots. That's precisely why they always fail no matter how much support they get beforehand, it's only a matter of time.

As of right now, as I've said time and time again. If Trump can succeed and uses his 2nd tenure to shape up that electoral law hardcore to ensure this shit doesn't happen again then we're 100% saved. The swamp won't magically go away, but much like with the spanish swamp, it's a matter of time before democracy fucks them up bit by bit. If Biden wins? Yeah, THEN you can go ahead and ring the Doombell with all your strength 'cause we're in for the roughest ride. The entire world is. Shit's gonna go down hard. But we still got a chance, and its name is Donald J Trump.

 

[Literally Murdered]

The neocons probably see the forever wars as a type of routine maintenance work, retaining the global peace by nipping geopolitical issues in the bud

Forever war = pissing infinite money into natsec and the arms industry (haha GDP go up!) = more effective protection racket in oil and natural gas regions.