Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Twórca wątku Borscht
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Dołączono
- 12 Maj 2020
- Dołączono
- 4 Mar 2019
According to legal eagle, that man touching her flag is assault, and she'd be fully justified if she broke his arm and stole his stuff.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 2 Kwi 2018
Sorry if someone already mentionned it but it might be worth to mention it again. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._away_from_running_for_president_in_1988.html
- Dołączono
- 7 Lip 2016
He could drop a "jigaboo" and a "shoeshine darkie" at this point, and the left wouldn't bat an eye.
- Dołączono
- 23 Sty 2015
He's talking about a mask mandate again, and also saying it's not a mandate at the same time.
- Dołączono
- 28 Lut 2019
This quantum candidate thing is an interesting strategy. Surprised the wave form hasn't collapsed yet. But then again, that would require someone on the left to actually, you know, observe him.
Orange Man Costume
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
I think the logic of the Quantum Biden thing is his team's handing out 2 narratives for his supporters and media to dish out situation-ally. They can't be wrong if they can change their answer on the fly.
In a game, it's like having both ice and fire arrows ready so you're covered for whatever enemy you run into.
In practice, you literally can't argue that the mandate is problematic because they can just deny it's a mandate for just that moment.
- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
This guy wants so many mandates that I think he might be a closeted supergay.
- Dołączono
- 28 Lut 2019
And he can do it to Trump on the debate stage. Debate 1 showed he's quite willing to lie, and the media is willing to keep the quantum state going. "He totally didn't want a mandate! Except when he said he did. Yesterday. But he said differently today! SHUT UP."
- Dołączono
- 9 Mar 2020
might I introduce you to the smiler?
I never payed attention to that. Can someone explain it to me?
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 5 Cze 2019
Or get people so confused as to what he actually stands for they vote for him based on outdated info.
Then he gets into office
- Dołączono
- 25 Maj 2013
Hmm St Michelle of the Obama came out today to call Trump a racist.
The optimist in me wants to believe that the DNC is seeing the writing on the walls and thus bringing out their big guns.
I mean if I was the DNC Obama would be out there on stage with Joe every damn day. That's how you get the blacks to turn out, show them St Obama and his anointed one.
His absence is telling.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/michelle-obama-comes-out-and-says-yes-trumps-campaign-is-racist
The optimist in me wants to believe that the DNC is seeing the writing on the walls and thus bringing out their big guns.
I mean if I was the DNC Obama would be out there on stage with Joe every damn day. That's how you get the blacks to turn out, show them St Obama and his anointed one.
His absence is telling.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/michelle-obama-comes-out-and-says-yes-trumps-campaign-is-racist
- Dołączono
- 17 Lip 2019
I wouldn't fret. Barack will show up... on Election Day, for a speech.
- Dołączono
- 25 Wrz 2020
If my dickwife came out and said that the current president is racist I wouldn't want to be anywhere nearby either. He's got umbrella drinks, whores, and security for life to worry about instead of this absolute clown show.
- Dołączono
- 7 Lip 2020
Biden's giving a speech at Gettysburg (where the dems failed in seceding from the republican government last time around) in about 5 minutes. His media surrogates in the Philadelphia Inquirer have made it seem like it's supposed to be a big deal for him. Bets on how many viewers? Will it just be the same trash as always? Will he even show up on time, or will it be an hour late? Will there be Trump protesters? The possibilities are endless!
Edit: Oof, CSPAN went live and it's already all Trump supporters.
Edit 2: 10 minutes after 4 PM starting time. The CSPAN tech guy is talking in the background, said "Yeah it's 4 PM and the protesters are here, but he has not yet arrived." More cops are showing up so maybe he's on his way? Wait never mind he's showing up. There are more cars in his motorcade than people who came to support Biden. Typical.
Edit 3: It's past 4:20 and nothing has begun yet. Are they giving Biden his amphetamine nasal solution or something?
Edit 4: Okay he's 30 minutes late and I've got other stuff to do. I'll try and come back and recap it later. This is ridiculous. Run your campaign on time, Biden you fucking idiot.
Edit: Oof, CSPAN went live and it's already all Trump supporters.
Edit 2: 10 minutes after 4 PM starting time. The CSPAN tech guy is talking in the background, said "Yeah it's 4 PM and the protesters are here, but he has not yet arrived." More cops are showing up so maybe he's on his way? Wait never mind he's showing up. There are more cars in his motorcade than people who came to support Biden. Typical.
Edit 3: It's past 4:20 and nothing has begun yet. Are they giving Biden his amphetamine nasal solution or something?
Edit 4: Okay he's 30 minutes late and I've got other stuff to do. I'll try and come back and recap it later. This is ridiculous. Run your campaign on time, Biden you fucking idiot.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 1 Sty 2020
initially came back online to post about the news that Eddie Van Halen passed away due to cancer, but here’s part two of “questions that will not be answered, or answers to questions that don’t probably answer said question” – The Kamala Harris version
www.breitbart.com
Wednesday’s vice presidential debate provides an opportunity for the American public to get answers from Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA).
The Democratic vice presidential nominee should be asked the following 25 questions. This list is by no means exhaustive.
Many of these questions were suggested by this author last month, but because they remain unanswered, I offer them again in the hope that the debate moderator will see fit to get answers from the California senator who, if elected, will be one heart beat away from the presidency.
1. After President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, many Democrats endorsed the idea of “packing” the Supreme Court by expanding the number of seats and filling them with liberal justices. You and Vice President Biden have refused to give your position on court-packing. Are you in favor of packing the court?
2. Do you believe Judge Barrett’s resume as a federal judge, former Supreme Court law clerk, and Notre Dame law professor qualifies her for the job? If not, why not? If so, how do you—as a feminist—justify your apparent ambivalence about even meeting with a qualified woman judicial nominee?
3. Judge Barrett has been attacked by members of your party because of her Catholic faith. This is of great concern to many millions of American Catholics because this appears to be a pattern with your party. In fact, you yourself once attacked a judicial nominee on the basis of his membership in the Catholic organization the Knights of Columbus, which is the largest fraternal organization in the world and includes among its past and present members many prominent Americans like President John F. Kennedy, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Gov. John Bel Edwards (D-LA), and Vince Lombardi. Do you believe that being a member of the Knights of Columbus disqualifies a person from holding public office? Would you refuse to hire someone on the basis of their membership in the Knights of Columbus or any other Catholic organization? In your questioning of this Catholic judicial nominee, you singled out the issue of the Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life. Would you disqualify a job applicant on the basis of their Catholic beliefs, including their beliefs about abortion? Do you believe that being pro-life disqualifies someone from employment?
4. Your history of attacking a judicial nominee solely on the basis of his membership in a Catholic organization led former Speaker Newt Gingrich to describe you as an “openly anti-Catholic bigot.” Do you disavow this characterization?
5. Should American Catholics or Catholic organizations be forced to pay for other people’s abortions? If elected, would you seek to force Catholics to fund abortions and other practices that are fundamentally in violation of their faith?
6. You recently claimed that you chose to become a prosecutor because you wanted to protect victims of sexual abuse. However, during your 13-year tenure as San Francisco’s district attorney and then California’s attorney general, you refused to prosecute any of the sexual abuse claims brought against Catholic priests, despite the pleas from victim groups. Why?
7. Also, why did your attorney general’s office refuse to release the documents obtained from the San Francisco archdiocese with all the information about priests accused of sexual abuse? Victims’ rights groups have criticized your office for deliberately burying these documents and thereby covering up the crimes and leaving the public unprotected. Why did you do this? The San Francisco district attorney’s office claimed in 2019 that they no longer have these documents in their possession. What happened to them? How can you claim to be a defender of children when you declined to prosecute the abusers of children?
8. Last June, you encouraged your Twitter followers to donate to a bail fund to assist protesters arrested in the Minneapolis, Minnesota, riots. Are you aware that in July this bail fund sprang from jail a man who was accused of sexually assaulting an 8-year-old girl? In August, the fund posted bail for a man accused of assaulting a 71-year-old woman whose home he had burglarized. In June, the fund helped bail out a man accused of stomping and robbing a victim in Minneapolis on the same day George Floyd died. Between June and August, the fund helped bail out six men who were accused of domestic violence, including two who were accused of strangling women in their homes. Do you have any words for the victims of these crimes?
9. Why did your office decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?
10. You said you believed the women accusing Joe Biden of inappropriate touching. Do you believe Tara Reade? If not, why not? If so, how do you justify supporting him now?
11. Why did you single out journalist David Daleiden for prosecution for undercover journalism that others do without penalty?
12. Your chief-of-staff, Karine Jean-Pierre, wrote an op-ed last year attacking the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Americans who associate with it, stating “You cannot call yourself a progressive while continuing to associate yourself with an organization like AIPAC that has often been the antithesis of what it means to be progressive.” Do you believe that pro-Israel activism is incompatible with progressive values?
25 Questions Kamala Harris Should Be Asked in the Debate
Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris should be asked the following 25 questions at Wednesday's debate.
Wednesday’s vice presidential debate provides an opportunity for the American public to get answers from Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA).
The Democratic vice presidential nominee should be asked the following 25 questions. This list is by no means exhaustive.
Many of these questions were suggested by this author last month, but because they remain unanswered, I offer them again in the hope that the debate moderator will see fit to get answers from the California senator who, if elected, will be one heart beat away from the presidency.
1. After President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, many Democrats endorsed the idea of “packing” the Supreme Court by expanding the number of seats and filling them with liberal justices. You and Vice President Biden have refused to give your position on court-packing. Are you in favor of packing the court?
2. Do you believe Judge Barrett’s resume as a federal judge, former Supreme Court law clerk, and Notre Dame law professor qualifies her for the job? If not, why not? If so, how do you—as a feminist—justify your apparent ambivalence about even meeting with a qualified woman judicial nominee?
3. Judge Barrett has been attacked by members of your party because of her Catholic faith. This is of great concern to many millions of American Catholics because this appears to be a pattern with your party. In fact, you yourself once attacked a judicial nominee on the basis of his membership in the Catholic organization the Knights of Columbus, which is the largest fraternal organization in the world and includes among its past and present members many prominent Americans like President John F. Kennedy, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Gov. John Bel Edwards (D-LA), and Vince Lombardi. Do you believe that being a member of the Knights of Columbus disqualifies a person from holding public office? Would you refuse to hire someone on the basis of their membership in the Knights of Columbus or any other Catholic organization? In your questioning of this Catholic judicial nominee, you singled out the issue of the Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life. Would you disqualify a job applicant on the basis of their Catholic beliefs, including their beliefs about abortion? Do you believe that being pro-life disqualifies someone from employment?
4. Your history of attacking a judicial nominee solely on the basis of his membership in a Catholic organization led former Speaker Newt Gingrich to describe you as an “openly anti-Catholic bigot.” Do you disavow this characterization?
5. Should American Catholics or Catholic organizations be forced to pay for other people’s abortions? If elected, would you seek to force Catholics to fund abortions and other practices that are fundamentally in violation of their faith?
6. You recently claimed that you chose to become a prosecutor because you wanted to protect victims of sexual abuse. However, during your 13-year tenure as San Francisco’s district attorney and then California’s attorney general, you refused to prosecute any of the sexual abuse claims brought against Catholic priests, despite the pleas from victim groups. Why?
7. Also, why did your attorney general’s office refuse to release the documents obtained from the San Francisco archdiocese with all the information about priests accused of sexual abuse? Victims’ rights groups have criticized your office for deliberately burying these documents and thereby covering up the crimes and leaving the public unprotected. Why did you do this? The San Francisco district attorney’s office claimed in 2019 that they no longer have these documents in their possession. What happened to them? How can you claim to be a defender of children when you declined to prosecute the abusers of children?
8. Last June, you encouraged your Twitter followers to donate to a bail fund to assist protesters arrested in the Minneapolis, Minnesota, riots. Are you aware that in July this bail fund sprang from jail a man who was accused of sexually assaulting an 8-year-old girl? In August, the fund posted bail for a man accused of assaulting a 71-year-old woman whose home he had burglarized. In June, the fund helped bail out a man accused of stomping and robbing a victim in Minneapolis on the same day George Floyd died. Between June and August, the fund helped bail out six men who were accused of domestic violence, including two who were accused of strangling women in their homes. Do you have any words for the victims of these crimes?
9. Why did your office decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?
10. You said you believed the women accusing Joe Biden of inappropriate touching. Do you believe Tara Reade? If not, why not? If so, how do you justify supporting him now?
11. Why did you single out journalist David Daleiden for prosecution for undercover journalism that others do without penalty?
12. Your chief-of-staff, Karine Jean-Pierre, wrote an op-ed last year attacking the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Americans who associate with it, stating “You cannot call yourself a progressive while continuing to associate yourself with an organization like AIPAC that has often been the antithesis of what it means to be progressive.” Do you believe that pro-Israel activism is incompatible with progressive values?
- Dołączono
- 1 Sty 2020
(cont.)
13. The Biden campaign has adopted a version of the Green New Deal that calls for 100 percent renewable electricity generation by 2035. California has adopted similar “green” goals, but now it can’t keep the lights on due to the state’s reliance on wind and solar energy. California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newson recently admitted that the Golden State needs a “backup” plan for energy because the current blackouts caused by lack of wind and overcast skies have shown the danger of relying solely on “green” energy. Why would the nation fare any better than sunny breezy California in keeping the lights on if we adopt 100 percent renewable energy?
14. You said in the past that we “need to hold China accountable” for trade violations, but you are against the use of tariffs. How do you intend to hold China accountable? You also said that “we need to export American products, not American jobs.” How do you intend to make sure we don’t export more American jobs to China? How would your policy differ significantly from the same policies that led to the loss of 4 million jobs to China?
15. You have supported the often violent Black Lives Matter uprisings and encouraged them to continue. Have you spoken to any victims of the riots — people who lost loved ones or businesses?
16. Do you believe that the looting of the Magnificent Mile in Chicago was a “form of reparations,” as one Chicago Black Lives Matter organizer claimed? Is looting an appropriate form of protest as a means of reparations?
17. Seattle Black Lives Matter protesters stormed a neighborhood, demanding that residents “get the f*** out” and “give black people back their homes” as reparations. Do you support that style of protest? If not, have you condemned it?
18. You recently claimed that it is both “outdated” and “wrongheaded” to think that adding police officers to the streets is the only way to make communities safer. What do you propose we do to stop the current wave of violent crime engulfing our cities?
19. What is the maximum number of illegal immigrants you would allow into the country before securing the border to stop more from entering?
20. The Obama administration deported an estimated 3 million illegal aliens. Was that a bad thing?
21. With 30 million Americans unemployed due to the coronavirus, would you support a halt on work visas for foreign workers competing with Americans for jobs? If not, explain to us why CEOs will not use this huge increase in the supply of labor to freeze and reduce salaries for American workers?
22. A number of prominent tech industry leaders have endorsed your campaign citing your support for increasing the number of H-1B foreign workers. Why is importing more foreign workers to compete with Americans a good idea right now?
23. Wall Street has praised Vice President Biden’s decision to choose you as his running mate. Why do you think financial special interests support you so much?
24. Will you be following the advice of your Wall Street and Silicon Valley donors in negotiating with China? If not, whose advice would you seek out in negotiating with China?
25. You have called on Congress to act on a coronavirus stimulus package, but you skipped a vote on a Republican proposal that would have provided relief to Americans. Are you putting any pressure on members of your party to stop blocking relief legislation for Americans?
Rebecca Mansour is a Senior Editor-at-Large for Breitbart News. Follow her on Twitter at @RAMansour.
13. The Biden campaign has adopted a version of the Green New Deal that calls for 100 percent renewable electricity generation by 2035. California has adopted similar “green” goals, but now it can’t keep the lights on due to the state’s reliance on wind and solar energy. California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newson recently admitted that the Golden State needs a “backup” plan for energy because the current blackouts caused by lack of wind and overcast skies have shown the danger of relying solely on “green” energy. Why would the nation fare any better than sunny breezy California in keeping the lights on if we adopt 100 percent renewable energy?
14. You said in the past that we “need to hold China accountable” for trade violations, but you are against the use of tariffs. How do you intend to hold China accountable? You also said that “we need to export American products, not American jobs.” How do you intend to make sure we don’t export more American jobs to China? How would your policy differ significantly from the same policies that led to the loss of 4 million jobs to China?
15. You have supported the often violent Black Lives Matter uprisings and encouraged them to continue. Have you spoken to any victims of the riots — people who lost loved ones or businesses?
16. Do you believe that the looting of the Magnificent Mile in Chicago was a “form of reparations,” as one Chicago Black Lives Matter organizer claimed? Is looting an appropriate form of protest as a means of reparations?
17. Seattle Black Lives Matter protesters stormed a neighborhood, demanding that residents “get the f*** out” and “give black people back their homes” as reparations. Do you support that style of protest? If not, have you condemned it?
18. You recently claimed that it is both “outdated” and “wrongheaded” to think that adding police officers to the streets is the only way to make communities safer. What do you propose we do to stop the current wave of violent crime engulfing our cities?
19. What is the maximum number of illegal immigrants you would allow into the country before securing the border to stop more from entering?
20. The Obama administration deported an estimated 3 million illegal aliens. Was that a bad thing?
21. With 30 million Americans unemployed due to the coronavirus, would you support a halt on work visas for foreign workers competing with Americans for jobs? If not, explain to us why CEOs will not use this huge increase in the supply of labor to freeze and reduce salaries for American workers?
22. A number of prominent tech industry leaders have endorsed your campaign citing your support for increasing the number of H-1B foreign workers. Why is importing more foreign workers to compete with Americans a good idea right now?
23. Wall Street has praised Vice President Biden’s decision to choose you as his running mate. Why do you think financial special interests support you so much?
24. Will you be following the advice of your Wall Street and Silicon Valley donors in negotiating with China? If not, whose advice would you seek out in negotiating with China?
25. You have called on Congress to act on a coronavirus stimulus package, but you skipped a vote on a Republican proposal that would have provided relief to Americans. Are you putting any pressure on members of your party to stop blocking relief legislation for Americans?
Rebecca Mansour is a Senior Editor-at-Large for Breitbart News. Follow her on Twitter at @RAMansour.
Getting tard comed
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
The decision is public so anyone can read it for yourself.
I'm going to preface what I say by saying I read it several years ago and so I don't remember exact quotes.
The summation of the decision was using one of the Bill of Rights amendments to justify gay marriage(I believe the right to privacy) which is retarded seeing as declaring something public by definition cannot be private. IIRC they read into a law passed to protect interracial marriages as protecting gay marriages even though that law says nothing about homosexual marriages and that wasn't on the minds of the people writing it. The court insinuated they did. Either the court or my retired federal judge family member(can't remember which) used "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" from The Declaration of Independence to justify the decision which is dumb beyond measure. 1) because tte declaration has literally no legal standing in American law other than as notifying the English Crown that the colonies said "kick rocks. We're out" 2) It was very clearly a rhetorical flourish and the same document is filled with those. And finally the decision justified itself by insinuating to not do so would be a gross infringement of human rights that could only come from a bigoted hateful place.
Again, that's from memory and having read it over 12 years ago now. W/e the arguments used for Scalia tore all of them apart to shreds. Scalia also raised the hypocracy and hubris it requires to call practically the entirety of human history and civilization as bigoted and hateful as well as brought up the hubris of the court to think 9 people all coming from 2 NE colleges should decide something this monumental for a country of 320 million people they have no connection with considering the basis was not a legal one. The court had no legal standing to make that decision and did it because those 5 justices felt like it was the right thing to do at the right time. That is not how any court or judge is supposed to act.
For the record, any two adults should be able to enter into a contract with each other. No church or person should be force to do something that goes agaisnt their faith. At least that's what I believe.
As I said, I encourage you and everyone to read the decision and the descents for yourself and come to your own conclusion. These are my thoughts from what I remember my reaction was to reading the decision 12 years ago now.
- Dołączono
- 17 Lip 2019
If you listen closely, you can hear the crickets.
- Status