US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Borscht
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Trump’s town hall on ABC > Joe Biden’s town hall on NBC

Even though, I don’t understand why we need more town halls in the first place.
I thought Joe Biden was taking a lid.

The Virgin Trump
Likes niggers, invites them the white house and gives them gibs. They don't vote for him.

The Chad Biden
Hates niggers, insults them in a classic fashion, doesn't even care, niggers still vote for him.

:thinking:
 
Bernie was also campaigning in Michigan today. It went about as well as you would expect.

qlX_bmMQppqkXR-g.mp4
This is her:
Genevieve Peters
Another occurrence that my local media have decided not to report on. Out of 5 local sites, only one gives passing mention.

Letting black women emasculate you... not even once.
Bernie does not discriminate, he's a cuck for all seasons, all races, for all time.
bernieinterrupted.jpg
 
1601953609533.png


Short answer: its settle law it far far to difficult to move roe v. waid.
long answer: he is wanting make it a part of the constituion that you can Abort(kill) babbies any time durring pregancy .
Which he i think he going to enshrine abortion clinics as a nescessary service.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1644068

Short answer: its settle law it far far to difficult to move roe v. waid.
long answer: he is wanting make it a part of the constituion that you can Abort(kill) babbies any time durring pregancy .
Which he i think he going to enshrine abortion clinics as a nescessary service.
Settled law? Pretty sure any case can be revisited by the SC. And seeing as the judicial branch can't make laws....

Anyway, that's not to abortion sperg more legal spergary on my part.

How come nobody uses the perfectly fine method the founders wrote in to add constitutional amendments? They could do that to "fix" the 2nd amendment. They could do that to add in mandatory abortion clinics in every city. What gives?


Edit: After watching the clip Bidens answer does implicitly question Roe v Wade's legality. But it's basically RBG's position. Undue RvW so an actual law can be passed to protect baby killing abortions. Which is what should have happened anyway.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
How come nobody uses the perfectly fine method the founders wrote in to add constitutional amendments? They could do that to "fix" the 2nd amendment. They could do that to add in mandatory abortion cli icsi in every city. What gives?
Because then they would have to be upfront about what they actually want, and not too many people would be keen on giving it to them.
 
Settled law? Pretty sure any case can be revisited by the SC. And seeing as the judicial branch can't make laws....

Anyway, that's not to abortion sperg more legal spergary on my part.

How come nobody uses the perfectly fine method the founders wrote in to add constitutional amendments? They could do that to "fix" the 2nd amendment. They could do that to add in mandatory abortion cli icsi in every city. What gives?
You answered your own question . *sigh* Everyone knows that everyone not is same group think to add or change things in constituion & People understand there going to political/ cloak & Dagger around trying to solve issues or delay and not vote on it.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1644068

Short answer: its settle law it far far to difficult to move roe v. waid.
long answer: he is wanting make it a part of the constituion that you can Abort(kill) babbies any time durring pregancy .
Which he i think he going to enshrine abortion clinics as a nescessary service.

Biden's actually right about this. Congress should make laws through the legislative process that pass Constitutional muster instead of letting the SCOTUS legislate from the bench. The same is true of Obergefell. It's not really a great decision (nor is Roe) but that doesn't mean abortion or gay marriage is impossible unless the SCOTUS says differently. It just means Congress has to fucking do something and pass a law about it.

Of course, this is too confusing to lefties who think they're owed everything right this instant. It's not something he needs his base to hear right now. But I'll give credit where credit is due, he's actually right about it.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1644068

Short answer: its settle law it far far to difficult to move roe v. waid.
long answer: he is wanting make it a part of the constituion that you can Abort(kill) babbies any time durring pregancy .
Which he i think he going to enshrine abortion clinics as a nescessary service.
I'm supposed to believe this man is any kind of Christian but just wants to keep his religion out of his politics. And am I following this right-- is this woman saying that she focused on career advancement so hard that she aborted her children to keep as much out of her way as possible? Did she actually do this while employing a euphemism for "abortion"?

(As an aside, I was mistaken about his standing with the Catholic Church-- he's not excommunicated... he was just refused communion by a church he visited and is no friend of the USCCB, but it's unlikely that he was automatically excommunicated for his politics.)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Biden's actually right about this. Congress should make laws through the legislative process that pass Constitutional muster instead of letting the SCOTUS legislate from the bench. The same is true of Obergefell. It's not really a great decision (nor is Roe) but that doesn't mean abortion or gay marriage is impossible unless the SCOTUS says differently. It just means Congress has to fucking do something and pass a law about it.

Of course, this is too confusing to lefties who think they're owed everything right this instant. It's not something he needs his base to hear right now. But I'll give credit where credit is due, he's actually right about it.
The gay marriage decision has some of the worst logic I've ever read. Period. And honestly made me look at Scalia as a sane individual. I have family who worked in DC and some of the clerked for SC judges, I only heard bad things about Scalia. His descent made me question those things. That's how bad that decision was written.
 
I'm supposed to believe this man is any kind of Christian but just wants to keep his religion out of his politics. And am I following this right, or is this woman saying that she focused on career advancement so hard that she aborted her children to keep as much out of her way as possible? Did she actually do this while employing a euphemism for "abortion"?

(As an aside, I was mistaken about his standing with the Catholic Church-- he's not excommunicated... he was just refused communion by a church he visited and is no friend of the USCCB, but it's unlikely that he was automatically excommunicated for his politics.)
NO, It's a gurl under age of about 30 wanting to free past of sex partying ( no wanting to deal with becoming pregnant) while still working not wanting accept the wage cage life.
Not understand sex chance of having pregancy is a high life decision.
Which keep push that doom day clock to artfical wombs. :story:
1601957299431.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
NO, It's a gurl under age of about 30 wanting to free past of sex partying ( no wanting to deal with becoming pregnant) while still working not wanting accept the wage cage life.
Not understand sex chance of having pregancy is a high life decision.
Which keep push that doom day clock to artfical wombs. :story:
Wyświetl załącznik 1644148
It's NBC poll lmao.
 
The gay marriage decision has some of the worst logic I've ever read. Period. And honestly made me look at Scalia as a sane individual. I have family who worked in DC and some of the clerked for SC judges, I only heard bad things about Scalia. His descent made me question those things. That's how bad that decision was written.
Good writing, not so good reasoning.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole